Written by Carl Heideman
From the Sept. 2006 issue
Posted in Drivetrain
No matter what the name on the valve cover, so many British classics rely on the ubiquitous SU carburetor: Jaguar, Triumph, MG, Rover, Rolls-Royce, Bentley, Morris, Austin, Sunbeam and so many more. And not only did almost every British manufacturer specify SU carburetors, but so did other companies. Volvo and Saab also used them, while Hitachi-built versions of the SU were used by Datsun.
Sure, Webers may be sexier and have more racing titles to their credit, but for normal use these SU carbs work well. While some people are quick to cast SUs aside and look for an upgrade, a little understanding and mild tuning can go a long way, whether the goal be increased performance, better drivability or improved fuel economy.
How They Work
Based upon a principle developed and patented by George Skinner in 1905, the SU (as in Skinners Union) carburetor changed very little until emissions regulations pretty much made them obsolete about 30 years ago. The SU is about as simple as a carb can get: it has very few moving parts, usually only one fuel circuit, and far fewer springs, balls and other complicated pieces than conventional carburetors.
All carburetors make use of the venturi principle. Daniel Bernoulli, an 18th-century Swiss scientist, used a venturi, a tube that is narrower in the middle than it is at either end, to discover that as the velocity of a fluid increases, its pressure decreases. As the air and fuel pass through the venturi’s narrowed passageway in a carburetor, the mixture speeds up; the resultant drop in pressure is what causes the fuel to atomize.
The SU employs this principle differently because it varies the size of the venturi. Hence, the SU is called a variable venturi carburetor and is grouped with those built by Stromberg, Predator and Amal.
In the center of the venturi is a piston with a tapered needle affixed to its bottom side. The piston has holes positioned in it so that as air is sucked through the venturi, vacuum above the piston makes it rise. When it rises, not only does more air flow to the engine, but the needle allows more fuel to flow from the jet below. The needle is a precision piece, with nine to 16 specific diameters measured during the manufacturing process to ensure proper fuel flow throughout the range of air flow to the carb.
Thus, the SU self-adjusts to the air/fuel requirements of an engine. It only flows as much air as necessary, and the tapered needle ensures that a proper fuel mixture is obtained at any air flow.
This self adjustment needs a little help at two times: During cold starting and hard acceleration, when a richer-than-normal air/fuel mixture is needed. SUs handle these two situations differently, but again use very simple means.
Cold starting any engine requires more fuel in the mixture. With conventional carburetors, this is done by limiting air intake, or choking the mixture. SU carburetors do the opposite, increasing fuel flow to richen the air/fuel mixture without limiting air flow. Most SUs do this by lowering the jet, which allows more fuel to flow thanks to the needle’s taper.
Conventional carburetors use an accelerator pump to squirt more fuel into the mixture on hard acceleration. Again, SUs take a different tack. The piston/needle assembly is damped via a plunger in an oil-filled tube, forming a sort of shock absorber for the carburetor. The damper slows and smoothes the movement of the piston. On hard acceleration, vacuum that would otherwise quickly lift the piston is redirected to quickly suck more fuel out of the jet. As the piston slowly continues its rise, the mixture returns to a more normal ratio.
Assuming that the carburetors are in good condition and have properly sized needles in them, the tuning procedure is not as complex as most people think. However, before the carbs are touched, ignition dwell and timing must first be correct. It’s a good idea to ensure valve clearances are correct as well. A quick check for vacuum leaks is next, and only once this is done is it time to move on to the carburetors.
Next, if there are two or more carburetors, they need to be synchronized. This can be done with either a dedicated synchronization tool or a short length of hose. With the engine running at idle—usually 600 to 1000 rpm—the synchronization tool is placed over the inlet of each carburetor to get a reading on its gauge. The idle screw is adjusted on each carburetor until each one gives the same reading on the synchronization tool.
The low-buck method is to substitute a 12- to 18-inch length of 1/4-inch or 5/16-inch hose for the tool. Hold one end of the hose up to the air inlet of each carb and the other end to your ear. When each carb emits the same noise through the hose, they are synchronized at idle. (Note that revving the engine slightly and periodically throughout the adjustment process helps to “clear out” the carbs.)
After the carbs are synchronized at idle, the throttle linkages can then be adjusted to ensure they remain synchronized throughout the rpm range. With just a little free play in the linkage, each throttle arm should start moving at the same time when the accelerator pedal is depressed. If not, the locking nuts can be loosened to adjust the linkage.
The idle mixture is set next. The conventional method, which is published in most manuals, works very well. First, each piston is lifted slightly, about 1/16-inch (usually a small screwdriver is helpful for this step). If the engine speed falls off, the mixture is too lean and the jet is lowered via its adjustment nut or screw. If the rpm rise, the mixture is too rich and the jet is raised. If raising the carb’s piston causes the engine speed to rise by about 50 rpm before returning to its previous level, the mixture is just right. An alternate method is to use a vacuum gauge and adjust the mixture in each carb to get the highest vacuum at idle that is possible.
At this point, the idle speed can be verified to be correct and the tuning is nearly done. All that is left is the “choke” adjustment. As discussed before, SUs don’t really have chokes, as they richen the mixture instead to allow smooth engine starting. This is usually accomplished through a linkage and cam that lowers the jets and raises the idle speed. The linkage and cam only affect idle speed in the first two-thirds of the distance of choke cable travel; it increases the air/fuel mixture as well as the idle speed during the final third of travel.
The two steps to adjustment are to ensure that multiple carb setups have proper linkage balance between carbs, then to set the high-speed idle screws that touch the cams. High speed idle is usually around 1800 rpm.
Rebuilding Old Carburetors
If you look at the sidebar on common problems, you’ll see that most problems related to SU carbs are due to wear or age. SU carbs are pretty easy to rebuild as there are relatively few parts.
Additionally, there are many competent rebuilders who can bring these carbs back to as-new condition for a reasonable fee—figure $50 to $75 to rebush each carb’s throttle shaft and $350 to $500 to completely rebuild a pair. Polishing all of the external parts can add another $100 to $200 to the rebuild cost.
Except for throttle shaft bushing replacement, most enthusiasts can carry out repairs at home. Throttle shaft and bushing condition are paramount to tuning an SU, and there are three common solutions for fixing worn parts.
One is to replace only the shafts. If the old shafts aren’t too worn, the bushings probably aren’t too worn, and new shafts will go a long way to stopping vacuum leaks.
The second repair is to ream out the bushings 0.010-inch and install oversized shafts. This is a cost-effective solution, but can only be carried out once.
The third method is to completely remove existing bushings and install new ones, then replace the shafts with standard ones. As can be expected, there are increasing requirements in terms of the cost, skill and tools necessary for each of the respective steps. Many rebuilders will replace these components and let you do the rest of the rebuild.
The rest of the rebuild entails replacing the jets and needles in the carb bodies and piston assemblies, the needle and seat in the float bowls (and floats if defective), and replacing gaskets and rubber pieces.
For the car-show crowd, all cast parts should be glass-beaded. It is then usually a good idea to get the linkages and hardware replated in zinc, and to polish the dashpots (the chambers for the pistons). If you’re a strict concours type, these were not plated or polished from the factory, but it seems most restored cars get them prettied-up anyway.
Don’t want to fuss with old carbs? Brand-new SU carburetors are still available. Depending on the application and vendor, figure a brand-new pair starts at about $550.
There are not too many performance modifications necessary or possible for SUs. Aside from changing to larger carbs, about all that can be done is to change to needles with a different taper and make modifications to increase air flow around the throttle disk and shaft.
Most SU specialists carry a range of needles for changing the mixture characteristics throughout the range of air flow. While the fine-tuning of needles can be an onerous process, there are generally just a few categories of standard needles available. Labeled weak, standard and rich, they provide the levels of performance and economy their names imply.
While there are more than 800 needle profiles available, many tuners will just make up their own profile by chucking the needles into a drill press and then using fine sandpaper to sand in the profile they like. Of course, they spend a fair amount of time with a micrometer to ensure they’ve narrowed the needle (richened it) the right amount.
Filters and velocity stacks can make a difference in performance. Usually, K&N filters are worth one or two horsepower. TWM’s velocity stacks can also offer a couple of horsepower, but usually cannot be effectively run with an air filter.
Finally, small improvements can be made to the carbs by improving air flow around the throttle shafts and disks. Carbs built after about 1968 feature throttle disks with a spring-loaded poppet valve that improves emissions, but the valve also impedes air flow. Fortunately, earlier flat disks can be fitted. For the radical tuner, the throttle shafts can be thinned and ovalized for an extra CFM or two of flow.
Why Keep Them?
So, why not just go to a Weber carburetor? For some, that’s a good solution, but many are bound to their SU carbs thanks to racing regulations. And then there are those who believe that properly set up SUs can perform just as well as Webers on the street, but with easier tuning and better manners.
In fact, we’re in the middle of dyno testing SU and Weber carburetors. Look for our findings soon.
New Vs. Rebuilt
Burlen Fuel Systems, the company that owns the rights and tooling to SU carbs, still makes and sells brand-new replacement setups. Available for most common British classics through the big suppliers like Moss Motors and Victoria British here in the U.S., these new carbs can be an excellent option.
However, the new carbs are not identical to the ones they are replacing. In most cases, many of the parts have been updated and thus are not interchangeable with the originals. As a result, if you go with these new SU carburetors, you won’t be able to use the standard replacement parts. We’ve also seen a few easy-to-overcome quality problems with the new carbs, like choke linkages needing slight bending to work properly.
How do you decide whether to go new or rebuilt? Consider your goals and budget. If you have a common setup like an MGB with HS4 carbs, then you may find the new ones not only a good option, but cheaper than a professional rebuild. For example, a pair of brand-new HS4 carbs will set you back about $550 to $575. A concours-quality rebuild can cost about $600 to $700. (If refinishing the external parts is not needed, knock about $100 or $200 off that figure.)
On the other hand, sometimes it’s more cost effective to rebuild the originals. New HIF4s run about $1000 per pair, while again it’s about $600 to $700 to rebuild them to concours condition. (Forgoing the polishing and replating work can save about $100 to $200 here, too.)
If “concours correct” is your goal, then there’s really no question and you’ll need to rebuild the original ones. (Don’t forget, however, that your car will be down while the carbs are sent out for a rebuild.)
Can’t decide whether to go with new or rebuilt carbs? Let your budget, situation and goals guide you.
Size Matters: Identifying SU Carbs
SU carbs come in several styles and sizes. Fortunately, there is a system for understanding the size of the carbs. Each carb is identified by one or more letters and numbers.
The first letter is an H or a V, which stands for Horizontal or Vertical. The SU carbs commonly used on European cars are all of the horizontal design.
The next letter will describe the physical characteristics of the carb and usually describes the float chamber location: S stands for Side float or Short body, depending on which expert you call; IF stands for Internal Float; and D stands for Diaphragm jet.
The numbers require an understanding of fractions, as they indicate how many eighths of an inch over 1 inch the carb’s throat size measures. So, an HS4 carb is 1+(4x1/8) inches, or 1 1/2 inches.
To put this together, an HIF4 (common MGB carb) is a horizontal, internal float, 1 1/2-inch carb. An HD8 (common XKE carb) is a horizontal, diaphragm type, 2-inch carb. An HS2 (common to Spridgets and Minis) is a horizontal, side float, 1 1/4-inch carb.
One exception to the “fraction” rule is the more modern HIF44, common to newer Minis. It is also called a “metric” SU because the float is measured in millimeters. (In this example, the horizontal, 44mm internal float measures about 1 3/4 inches across.)
In addition to size and type, there are a few other things to consider before you start buying used carbs on eBay. Some carbs have vacuum fittings, some do not. Carbs are often configured in sets of two or three and need to be kept in order for linkages to work. HS carbs may also have different float bowl angles. For example, Spridgets are 20 degrees, while Minis are 30 degrees.
If you had to pick from the various models, the HS version is probably the best one to go with, followed by the HIF models. The earlier H type carbs are pretty good, but suffer from faster wear in the choke linkages and are a little more prone to leaks from the float bowls. HD carbs are more complicated, with a separate idle circuit and diaphragms inside. HS and HIF carbs aren’t perfect, either: HS models are very prone to throttle shaft wear, while HIFs don’t tend to wear at the throttle shafts, but are a bit more complicated and have more of a tendency to overflow if they get dirty.
How many carbs should you run? For most performance engines, one carb for every two cylinders works pretty well. How big? Unless your engine is pretty heavily modified, you’ll probably do best with the stock size that came with the car. If you need a little more, jump up a quarter of an inch. If you’ve got a full-race engine with an excellent breathing head, go up half an inch.
Great article Carl. I thing I was hoping you'd address the effects of ethanol laced fuel on both old, rebuilt new carbs and replacement parts. What gives and what can I do to prevent potential engine fires?
Yes, very good article Carl. Thanks. I've been a big fan of SU carbs since I had them on my P1800 years ago. For my current Spitfire project I could have replaced the original tired HS2 carbs with a single 2BBL Weber DGV, but chose to have the SU's rebuilt by Joe Curto for about the same money. My preference. I like the performance, they're simple to tune, and I think they look great on a vintage sports car.
This was a good article in 2006 and is still good.
Chasmo, I've heard horror stories about ethanol eating the aluminum in carbs, but I've never witnessed that and I think it is overblown. Generally, the fuel in the carbs evaporates fairly quickly if the car just sits, so the worst you get is gunk clogging up stuff. I have found that the ethanol will attack rubber stuff over time, though, causing leaks in carbs with rubber diaphragms and the like. Had to do the triple carbs on my E-Type because of this. New diaphragms were sourced from Joe Curto and he assured me they would be unaffected by ethanol.
In reply to Basil Exposition:
Yes, I agree. I think the ethanol issue is greatly overblown.
I've worked on countless cars with SUs since gas has had ethanol in it, and I have seen zero problems I'd attribute to it. I have seen it decay old fuel lines in a hurry, but that's been it.
Neat article. I wondered why those 'little british' carbs looked so different from 'normal' carbs. Neat to know they are actually quite elegantly designed.
I've never used Webers. I have 4 British cars that all have SUs, including the vintage racer. Virtually every British car I race against uses SUs, as well, so I don't know about the Webers being better for racing. We do some modifications and often go up a size on the SUs to get them to flow more, but that's about it. The guys that I have talked to that have tried Webers tell me they are much more difficult to tune and are much more complicated with lots of fiddly bits.
The design theory is brilliant.
Where people become frustrated with them is because:
1-They are not aware of the design theory of a constant velocity carburetor and/or are not wanting to learn it.
2-The throttle shafts tend to be universally worn out by 30,000, miles making it impossible to tune the carburetor. I think the later HIF carbs were better in this respect.
3-The floats are harder to adjust than you think: I find that the only reliable method is to adjust the floats to whatever it takes to just cover the jet when it is fully retracted. Ignore all methods described in the book telling you to use drop test or 1/8" rods or whatever. Does not seem to relate to the proper level in the jet where it matters.
4-Very few people know about the drop test that needs to be done to ensure that the "Bell" and piston are a proper match. Not only do you need to be aware of the test, but with all of the mixing and matching of parts over 50 years, there are a lot of mismatched bells and pistons that can drive the unknowing mechanic crazy.
Once you can get past the learning curve, the behave and tune pretty much as described in the manual and do a great job.
You can have SUs and one throat per cylinder. I used to run these (very rare indeed)
In reply to VClassics: I agree with you. Fear of Ethanol is way overblown.. Once you start to understand it there is potential for power increases at far less than racing fuel costs.. Alcohol has added oxygen molecules in it. That means you can richen the mixture up (something very easy to do on SU's)add a little timing and gain power.. Or you can use it's higher octane to increase compression without the need for expensive race gas..
Careful though, methanol is corrosive and right now it's cheaper than ethanol..
In reply to Basil Exposition:
I like SU's also but if you really want to make an uncool British car like our TR7 vintage racer cool then its best to do this.
In reply to TR8owner:
Yes indeed. That's cool!
Once upon a time I tried running twin SUs on a VW Beetle engine.I had a terrible time tuning them until I spent a couple of hours with Olie Clubine. He was a distributor for SU bits at the time. When I told him what I was trying to do he gave me some needles and springs and suggested a combination that worked like a charm.
In reply to Carl Heideman: The cost of tuning SU carbs is a tiny fraction of the cost of tuning Webers
With SU's I often will ream out the Jet or sandpaper the needle on the dyno* until I wind up close to my goal.. Then I carefully measure and check my inventory. Over the decades I've saved hundreds of needles, jets etc.. However if you don't have that contact Joe Curto
My dyno is a long hill where can time events from marker to marker.. It helps that I have air density meter, accurate air temp gauge, exhaust gas analyzer etc.. so I can be consistent.
I bought one set of Webers for a V12 Jaguar and by the time I had the carbs even close I'd spent over a grand not to mention the dyno time..
Air density changes constantly and with fixed Venturi Carbs like Webers it gets much more critical to adjust for those changes.. Jets and venturi's can easily run over a $100 per carb per adjustment. On a V12 Jaguar depending on the altitude of the track and the weather changes you might need $3-5000 to cover all your bases.. SU's on the other hand often require nothing more than one or two flats adjusted on the mixture..
SUs look physically shorter than Weber DCOEs even when the DCOEs are fitted with short air horns...the actual bodies of a SU appear more compact. Is this true? I'm thinking SUs could be a good choice for slant four engines where a normal DCOE carb and manifold would be a real tight fit between the head, brake master cylinder, and strut tower.
Guys, sorry I'm a little late to chime in. I'm glad you liked the story. I'd almost forgotten about it--2008 was a while ago.
Frenchyd's got a very good point about Webers. I bet I've got about $5000 in tuning parts at Eclectic Motorworks (jets, emulsion tubes, air correctors, venturies, aux venturies, etc.). When you own a shop, that's fine as you'll got to your parts bin all the time for customer work. But when it's your only car, it's probably cheaper to take it to a shop than build your own assortment. I'll say that to me it's an urban myth that you've got to constantly change jetting for weather etc. on a street car. Sure, if you're a racer and you're wanting that last bit of HP for the long straight, you may change something for a temp or humidity change, but on the street it's not an issue. Just like properly setup SUs, our customers hardly ever need their tune up touched once we've got their ignition and carbs dialed in.
Regarding ethanol, we seem to be seeing these issues:
The carbs do need to run richer and we're not seeing more power on the dyno (less BTUs in ethanol). Actually a little less HP. If could build an engine from scratch for ethanol, that would be a different story--we would add CR and some other things to take advantage of it. Cars especially need more idle mixture and tend to produce more smell and black smoke as a result. We'll usually run the hottest thermostat possible to help keep the combustion temps up for better idling (it takes more heat to burn an ethanol mixture).
We see more trouble with fuel boiling after the engine is shut down and heat soaks the carbs. Many people are calling this vapor lock, but what really is happening is fuel boiling out of the float bowls and flooding the engine. Holding the throttle all the way to the floor on hot start usually starts the car, but heat shields really help here. MGs had heat shields from the factory, many TRs didn't. TR6's especially have been problematic until we fit heat shields. (We also see trouble with American engines and have fitted heat shields under Holleys with good success for hot start issues.)
As mentioned, we're seeing fuel lines not lasting as long. We feel like we're replacing more floats than in the past. Internal corrosion is also an issue.
We've also seen ethanol fuel attack fuel tank liners so we tend to replace tanks rather than coat used tanks with a liner.
I'm not a scientist, but I have enough repeated anecdotal evidence to say these issues seem to be consistent with ethanol laced fuel. We can get ethanol-free fuel and seem to see less of these issues in customers and cars that use it.
Excellent follow up to an excellent original story. Very beneficial. Thanks again.
I'm definitely having a hot-starting problem with the single Z-S on my Spitfire. There is a sort of home made heat shield, but it doesn't seem to be doing much. I recently acquired a factory shield that I plan to install soon. Hopefully that and a tune up will help. The car ran great for a few months and then sort of went wonky.
I am working on a 1275 equipped bugeye with later HS2's and am in the process of rebuilding the carbs.
A few quick questions.
Regarding throttle shaft wear, what amount of play would you feel necessitates reaming/bushing? One of my two carbs had a worn shaft, but the body had minimal wear and very little play on a non-worn segment of the shaft. I am trying to get a feel for the threshold of need for this service.
Would you suggest greasing or anything (graphite/other) to avert the throttle shaft wear post-rebuild?
How much importance is there really with what oil is used in the dashpot? Some sources seem to indicate that specialized oil ($$) should be used and others indicate to just put your motor oil in.
Regarding throttle shaft wear, my test if the car is running is to spray carb cleaner at the shafts and if the idle changes, they're worn (i.e., there is a vacuum leak). If the carbs are off, a visual test is usually enough. If you can see (or feel) a wear line, the shafts are worn out. If it's a small nick, you can often just replace the shafts and be okay. If it's a big chunk of the shaft worn out, you can assume the bodies/bushings are worn too and will want to address them.
I oil throttle shafts when I put them in and then drool some oil over them from time to time and hope that it wicks in. I don't know if it helps a lot, but it can't hurt.
Regarding dashpot oil, everyone has an opinion as to what is best. My opinion for street cars is that any oil is better than no oil. The purpose of the oil and damper is to keep the piston from rising too fast so there is enough vacuum to suck more fuel into the mixture. The oil/damper is basically the accelerator pump. Racers have sworn by ATF because it's thinner, but remember they're at WOT much of the time and want that piston up fast (in fact, serious race engines with SUs don't even run dampers). I prefer a thicker oil than ATF, so I run engine oil or 90 wt in my own and customer cars. Years ago, we put every type of oil in some HS4s on an MGB and ran them on a dyno. No difference in power. There is always a lean spike at initial tip-in and it was slightly shorter with thicker oil, so that's what I recommend for street cars. For racers, whatever gets you the fastest lap time or highest RPM on the long straight is the answer.
In reply to Carl Heideman: Carl you are spot on. I should have said something about racing when I made my comments.. For the street there is plenty of tolerance in carbs to adjust for weather changes etc.. Same thing with regard alcohol, the power comes from the ability to use higher compression without detonation. If the engine is stock the slight richening effect that can be tuned into gas with alcohol won't yield any measurable power increase.
wspohn wrote: You can have SUs and one throat per cylinder. I used to run these (very rare indeed)
Burlen is reintroducing the dual choke SU carb, the DU.
Prototypes were shown at the Goodwood Festival.
Sizes will be 1-1/2 and 1-3/4
Available '.. sometime in the new year.', no mention of prices.
Carl Heideman wrote: ... Years ago, we put every type of oil in some HS4s on an MGB and ran them on a dyno. No difference in power. ... For racers, whatever gets you the fastest lap time or highest RPM on the long straight is the answer.
I would not expect any power difference.
Would be interested in quickest response time to redline when you crack open to WOT.
On the dyno, run at 3000 RPM, go WOT, and capture time needed to get to redline.
Even better, do the test in 1,000 RPM increments.
As you say, shortest laptimes win!
"Burlen is reintroducing the dual choke SU carb, the DU. Prototypes were shown at the Goodwood Festival. Sizes will be 1-1/2 and 1-3/4"
That link doesn't work - do you have an URL for this? Very interesting. I know some guys that would run these instead of Webers, just to be different!
wspohn wrote: "Burlen is reintroducing the dual choke SU carb, the DU. Prototypes were shown at the Goodwood Festival. Sizes will be 1-1/2 and 1-3/4" That link doesn't work - do you have an URL for this? Very interesting. I know some guys that would run these instead of Webers, just to be different!
That was the URL.
I just clicked on it from the posting and it worked, but maybe because the URL was still in my cache.
Here, with quotes:
The bottom of the linked page says: Simply send an email to DU6@sucarb.co.uk expressing your interest and you will receive regular updates specifically about the new Carburetters.
Looks like the URL to something in your Yahoo email account or something you accessed through it. It isn't working for us. Maybe if you post your Yahoo username and password we can view it. JK
Yeah, I'm on their email list and that arrived.
I searched for, but didn't find a Burlen DU link.
Meanwhile, something like this for a Spitfire ...
(vaguely sexual I think)
Just finished a E36 M3 show where I installed a professionally rebuilt set of H type carbs on a guys car. They were beautiful to look at and the car ran fine. Of course they pissed fuel out the bottom of the jet assembly. Cause there will ALWAYS be some issue with an SU carb!
Absolutely brilliant design, but they can't quite execute in the real world. There is a reason that the DGV swap has been so successful.
NOHOME wrote: Just finished a E36 M3 show where I installed a professionally rebuilt set of H type carbs on a guys car. They were beautiful to look at and the car ran fine. Of course they pissed fuel out the bottom of the jet assembly. Cause there will ALWAYS be some issue with an SU carb! Absolutely brilliant design, but they can't quite execute in the real world. There is a reason that the DGV swap has been so successful.
Gee, I've only been doing SU on LBC for 45 years and NEVER seen an SU that '... pissed fuel out the bottom of the jet assembly...' except when someone screwed the pooch on the build.
Given that a properly adjusted float will maintain the fuel level below the jet opening (assuming someone RTFM and didn't fit a high pressure fuel pump),
and that the fuel tubes are crimped to the jet, the only way they would leak is if someone has seriously damaged something or didn't bother to properly connect the fuel line to the float bowl chamber.
As for DGV swap, hahahahaha, lists are full of unsuspecting newbies that heard 'Weber', got stars in their eyes, and thought they were bolting on some serious kit.
Then #1/#4 runs lean while #2/#3 runs rich, or vice versa, the crankcase pressurizes and blows oil out the dipstick tube, vac advance port doesn't function the same for the dizzy, they spend a bunch of extra time and money buying and trying various jets and tubes trying to get the damned thing to run properly ...
Is that the DGV 'success' you are referring to?
In reply to Basil Exposition: You don't use Webers? Wow are you missing out on a lot of good fun. Carrying a whole box of jets out and finding you never have exactly the right ones for that moment in time, tuning for cool and damp conditions then retuning for hot and dry between heat races, having everyone else in the pits who uses Webers bothering you for spares, or bothering everyone else in the pits using Webers for spares because none in your box of parts works on that specific day, at that specific time of day.
Man why would anyone use SUs or Hitachis? They're not nearly as easy to blame for your terrible laps as Webers are! And you might actually have time to study the course, eat lunch, and plan for your next time on the track. How boring!
But then that's my opinion & I've trod both trails. Others might not agree. And looking at their results, they're right in their case. For me at least the switch/s to Webers hasn't ever been the end-all be-all I expected.
In reply to Basil Exposition: It's pretty standard that if you have a properly set up set of Webers they will make 15 horsepower more than the 2 inch SU's on a Jaguar. Of course With Webers you needs to have a properly calibrated air density meter that you treat like the crown jewels.. That and a really complete set of jets (60 isn't nearly enough) along with pages, (and pages, and pages) of dyno sheets with tests at various air density figures.
In reply to frenchyd: Yes I had three Webers on mine. Both times, maybe it was three, that I got them perfect it was a perfect ride. However most days I spent more time watching the clouds than watching the track change.
My take is that carbs cannot make power, but they can restrict it. If I build a 140 HP Volvo engine, a pair of 1.75" SUs will support that just fine, and there's no advantage in going to 45DCOEs (which I'd have to choke down pretty far in any case). If I build a 180 HP engine, SUs won't flow well enough to support that, but DCOEs will.
It takes some effort to get the Webers jetted right -- a dyno session is very helpful -- but I've never found that they were at all picky after that. I ran a pair of 48DCOs on a daily driver for years, rain or shine, hot or freezing, and never felt any need to change jets.
In reply to VClassics:
WOW!! I've never heard anyone say that before! After I got my 3 on my Jag and my 3 on my 240Z jetted right they ran great once or twice. The rest of the time they ran OK. Unless of course I spent more time jetting than driving. But when the next weather front came in, they were back to OK. How many jets do you have for your Webers? I often found 100 weren't enough for three carbs at a time.
I've never had a triple setup, which of course would make syncing them that much harder and require half-again as many jets. I really haven't found that they are at all sensitive to temperature or humidity, and they will automatically compensate for air pressure to some extent.
The engine I use for my avatar went into a Carrera Panamerica race car which won the 2-liter class in 2009. That year's running went from sea level in the south of Mexico to over 9000 feet elevation with patches of snow on the ground, and they did just fine with just a selection of three main jets (they did have a wide-band AFR gauge in the cockpit). I'm sure that wasn't optimum at altitude, but they did just fine with it.
On the Volvo engines I deal with, I know that F2 tubes will work with big cams and F15 will work with mild ones. Low-speed jets are either going to be 55F8 or 60F8. Air correctors are going to end up 40 to 50 points higher than the main jets. I've never had to mess with the pump jets or drain. Chokes with depend on the cam and displacement, and those are predictable. That just doesn't leave all that much to experiment with.
My hat's off to you!!
I've had SU's on my Volvo's and Webers on my Maserati, (3 2barrels). Both are great and once adjusted the Webers run fine for several years w/o issue, (but no, I don't drive it in the Winter months). The SU's also run fine with a seasonal tune, (then again I am doing valves etc.) I must note though these are on stock motors and set up as stock as they are meant to be.
I have a bunch of Webers in operation but I have a definite soft spot for SUs too.
This is a triple carb system I created for an MGC.
I run triple SU HD8's on my '57 100-6 MM Austin Healey vintage racer. I chassis dyno every spring before the race season to fine tune everything, after that I don't touch the carbs for the rest of the year. My SU's have been very reliable for the past 10 years on tracks across the US at different elevations with little to not adjustments.
You'll need to log in to post.
1 day ago in Articles
When Lotus first unleashed the Elise some 20 years ago, the automaker’s message was clear: We’re back, baby.