Go back to the tail end of the 1970s, and things weren’t looking so great for fans of the traditional sports car–plus we had to wear all that polyester. A savior was approaching, though, and it came from an unlikely source: Japan.

Datsun’s 240Z gave Americans a viable alternative to Europe’s best starting late in 1969, and the Mazda RX-7’s release for the 1979 model year continued that trend. The RX-7 had one more ace up its sleeve: smooth rotary power. The rotary promised strong horsepower numbers from only 1.2 liters of displacement. Fuel economy? Well, we won’t go there.

That first-generation RX-7 was a hit in showrooms, quickly introducing a new generation to the two-seat sports car. And this one didn’t leak in the rain or force its occupants to make compromises.

The Mazda married front struts with a live rear axle–par for the day. The 12A rotary engine could be backed with either a four- or five-speed manual transmission; some cars were sold with a three-speed automatic. Performance was more than adequate for the times, too. Buyers could add options like alloy wheels, a rear anti-roll bar and air conditioning.

The original RX-7 ran through the 1985 model year, and Mazda continuously made upgrades and changes. A refresh for 1981 replaced the two individual taillights with a full-width setup while better integrating the bumpers. That same year saw the replacement of the original thermal reactors with a traditional catalytic converter.

The optional GSL-SE package came in 1984, and it added the larger, more powerful 13B rotary engine: 135 horsepower versus the 101 found in the standard car. The GSL-SE also received fuel injection and came standard with the five-speed.

One more reason to love the original RX-7: It flat-out dominated IMSA GT competition from the late ’70s through 1987, two years after production ended.

Today Japanese classics are picking up fans, and prices are likewise increasing. The Hagerty guide says that right now, it’s almost impossible to spend more than $10,000 on a first-generation RX-7–and we’ve seen most cars trading at half that figure. Which iteration should you bank on? We’d put our money on a firstyear car or the hotter GSL-SE. And even if prices remain flat, you get to enjoy a fun-to-drive neoclassic that’s still supported by a rich aftermarket.

Read the rest of the story

secretariata
secretariata HalfDork
6/4/15 9:46 p.m.

So which one of you didn't want to claim this piece? Or do you have a new intern that hasn't been introduced to the mob yet?

BillBall
BillBall New Reader
6/5/15 6:09 a.m.

In reply to the staff of Motorsport Marketing:

So why would you buy one over a Porsche 944, given that the go for the same prices?

TR8owner
TR8owner HalfDork
6/6/15 10:28 p.m.

In reply to BillBall:

For the same price I'd agree that the 944 is a more desirable car than the RX7, but I'd suspect the Mazda is much easier and cheaper to maintain than the Porsche, and probably less finicky/more reliable also.

wspohn
wspohn HalfDork
6/7/15 10:08 a.m.

The one for me would be the FD turbos!

Rupert
Rupert Dork
6/8/15 9:29 a.m.

In reply to BillBall Japan's quality & reliability! :

BillBall
BillBall New Reader
6/9/15 7:00 a.m.

I haven't owned both so I can't claim know the answer but I wonder if a 30 year old rotary RX-7 is any more reliable that a 30 year old Porsche 944, condition and maintenance being equal.

kanaric
kanaric Dork
6/12/15 10:52 a.m.
BillBall wrote: In reply to the staff of Motorsport Marketing: So why would you buy one over a Porsche 944, given that the go for the same prices?

Rotary is easy to build and cheap to build. I don't think i've heard of anyone significantly doing any work to the non-turbo 944s. RX7 is more of a weird car and caters towards those people. Rotary engine is interesting to many people.

If I didn't want to do any power mods, why I think you would buy the RX7 if you were going from logical reasoning, I wouldn't get the 944 even. I would get a 924S.

Really why would you buy either car? There are "better" (opinion) cars at the same price. You can always come up with something else. Alfa GTV6, Skyline GTS-T, E30 BMW, S12 200SX, Mitsubishi Starion, etc. The fans of each could argue their point for all of those vs 944 or RX7. Like I would pick up a Starion WAY before I picked up a RX7 or 944. Not for any reason other than I like them.

racerdave600
racerdave600 SuperDork
6/12/15 11:42 a.m.

I have owned both RX7s and 944's, and to me the choice is easy; 944 hands down. Even with the maintenance tax, its far and away the better car. The only good point to the RX7 to me was the engine. The rotary was super sweet, but everything else was a let down. Mine was a '83 GSL and the steering was numb and lifeless. Power only OK, even in the '80's when I owned it.

I used to autocross a friend's later GTU model RX7, and I liked it less than my '83. You had to literally drag it around the course. It never worked very well and it had no "soul" to speak of. It was rather a bland car. Nice, but bland. Now, the ND he traded for, that was a different story. Fantastic car.

By comparison, the 944 was great to drive. The steering feel still ranks among the best ever, and the driving position is spot on. Of course it is more expensive and there are probably better, newer alternatives, but I still miss both my NA and Turbo 944's. I can't day that about other cars I've owned.

pjr300
pjr300 New Reader
9/5/16 7:32 a.m.

In reply to racerdave600 : Dave, I'd agree with you... but your playing field wasn't level! The '83 with the 12A is a pretty basic car, and the 944 was probably double the cost when new.

Now, the '84-85 model with the 13B is a much more fair and interesting comparison with the 944. I have never enjoyed driving a 12A car, but the 13B models are a blast, especially with some better width and lower profile rubber to improve the handling.

The GTU was part of the FC series (2nd gens, 1986-91) which were generally dogs from many perspectives (style, quality, performance). Today they are good hosts for LS1 swaps, something I generally consider sacrilegious, but in this case, I'd make an exception.

Currently own a FD (which is a whole different kettle of fish)...

TR8owner
TR8owner HalfDork
9/5/16 1:55 p.m.

I'd much rather have my TR8 over a 944 or RX-7. Certainly a lot more performance potential from the V8 and more exclusive, although its probably more fair to compare the RX-7 with a TR7. But to get back to the OP, my brother had a very nice bright red RX-7 back in the day with the optional targa look top and front spoiler. He sold it to pick up a TR6 which he still owns today, but I still remember his RX-7 as a very nice car. At the same time my buddy owned a Porsche 924 and another had a TR7 but I'd consider the RX-7 the more preferable.

JoeTR6
JoeTR6 HalfDork
9/5/16 7:52 p.m.

I've always liked RX-7s of any vintage. My Mom had a FC, and the one time she let me drive it solo left quite an impression (I was used to driving a '73 Beetle, so...). I was visiting her last week in Tennessee and saw what appeared to be a solid 1985 FB RX-7. Somehow, the temptation to stop and check it out closer was resisted. I'd love to have an FD, but too much money for a toy and I can't see daily driving one at this point. I like 944s, but I'd take a nice RX-7 any day.

Our Preferred Partners
eXQGkgIsGL0gI0oNL3s9UwQl47J9Csk46sGVN5vs08grdDNCNL3tRo93ZxzVZotP