1 2 3
oldsaw
oldsaw SuperDork
3/2/11 7:33 a.m.

The FT-86 has been revealed to the public, at least in concept form:

More photos here: http://www.autoblog.com/photos/toyota-ft-86-ii-concept-geneva-2011/

92CelicaHalfTrac
92CelicaHalfTrac SuperDork
3/2/11 7:45 a.m.

That actually looks.... damn near ready to go. I are excite.

Jay
Jay SuperDork
3/2/11 7:55 a.m.

Wow, I like that. I think it's better looking than the Genesis (which I also like.) More of a new Mk II/III Supra than a new AE86 though.

Then again I am a total sucker for metallic black/slate colours with tinted windows.

Tom Heath
Tom Heath Web Manager
3/2/11 7:55 a.m.

Yes, please.

Raze
Raze Dork
3/2/11 8:02 a.m.

The front/quarter/rear shots are all flattering but the side on shot is disturbing. The car is FUGLY when viewed from the side. The rear is far too tall, the cockpit is bubbly to say the least, yet the front end is nice and sleek? it's like a G35 sedan smacked into a Ferrari, half hatchback with a pretty nose, nobody's making a proper rear anymore. Sad.

z31maniac
z31maniac SuperDork
3/2/11 8:09 a.m.

Hmmm, that is tasty.

I wonder if they are ever going to release some "official" stats for the thing. I'm ready RIGHT NOW, to go trade in the Speed3 for this.

Slyp_Dawg
Slyp_Dawg Reader
3/2/11 8:28 a.m.
Raze wrote: The front/quarter/rear shots are all flattering but the side on shot is disturbing. The car is FUGLY when viewed from the side. The rear is far too tall, the cockpit is bubbly to say the least, yet the front end is nice and sleek? it's like a G35 sedan smacked into a Ferrari, half hatchback with a pretty nose, nobody's making a proper rear anymore. Sad.

I disagree, the most recent Panoz Esperante race cars were quite good looking from the rear, same with the current gen Lotus Elise and the something-2009 BMW Z4. the 2011 Z4 got all fuglyfied, though

I definitely want specs to be released for this thing, even if the rear end on it is a bit ungainly. what I would like is if proper kammbacks started reappearing. it is properly hard to screw up a flat panel, unless you bolt a massive bumper to it or put ugly tail lights on it. kammback, round tail lights, no bumper. look at a 3/4 rear shot of a FFR Daytona Coupe and tell me I'm wrong. exactly.

EricM
EricM Dork
3/2/11 8:31 a.m.

A Porsche 911 and a Chrysler crossfire had a baby. And I like that. (I too like the Genesis, and this is like a steroid Genesis)

Tyler H
Tyler H Dork
3/2/11 8:31 a.m.

I think it will look nice when they drop some of the concept car sharp edges. Wonder if the windows are tinted out because the interior is missing/incomplete?

pinchvalve
pinchvalve SuperDork
3/2/11 8:40 a.m.

Kinda reminds me of this:

Which is not a bad thing at all!!!!

ReverendDexter
ReverendDexter SuperDork
3/2/11 9:03 a.m.

I want more hatch, but really, I've ceased to care what this thing looks like until they release a production curb weight and official MSRP. Weight and price are what make or break this car for me, not looks.

SilverFleet
SilverFleet HalfDork
3/2/11 9:13 a.m.

I still think that thing is going to end up FWD and be the replacement for the Camry Solara, that is, if it ever comes out at all. I just don't trust today's Toyota.

92CelicaHalfTrac
92CelicaHalfTrac SuperDork
3/2/11 9:15 a.m.

Released prices and specs are confusing.

So far, i'm seeing $29k (god i hope that's not the base price), 170hp (UGH).

They better get this thing some power or drop down that price or they won't sell ANY. The Genesis/G37 will eat this berkeleyer alive.

SilverFleet
SilverFleet HalfDork
3/2/11 9:33 a.m.

In reply to 92CelicaHalfTrac:

...And that's the thing I'm afraid of IF they actually come out with this thing. Toyota will price the car out of it's intended market. They have the Scion TC which this thing will steal sales from left and right if it's priced in the low 20's. Truth is, the TC and this car are completely different animals, other than the fact that they are both 2-doors. When the FT-86 is priced so high that no one buys them, Toyota will come back and say that there's no market for a car like this and other companies will follow suit, just like in the 90's. It will be bad for everyone.

z31maniac
z31maniac SuperDork
3/2/11 9:35 a.m.

^Hahahaha, there is no way that can be true, is there?

Who would spend $30k on that? How well is the V6 Genesis selling?

At $30k I'd be looking at a new Mustang GT ($32k and you get 19s and Brembos) or 370Z...............NOT this car.

92CelicaHalfTrac
92CelicaHalfTrac SuperDork
3/2/11 9:39 a.m.

I'm hoping that they're going to release more engine choices. The n/a boxer, a 2.0T, and the STi motor maybe.

The $29k would make sense with the STi motor, for sure.

Not so much with the n/a 170hp lump.

Raze
Raze Dork
3/2/11 10:14 a.m.

Toyota = old GM, they better take note...

Slyp_Dawg
Slyp_Dawg Reader
3/2/11 10:38 a.m.

depending on the curb weight, that 170hp lump might not be so bad, but the STi motor or even a WRX motor would make more sense I think. and definitely drop the MSRP down a bit, but I'm really not sure where they could shave money from without making the car worse in a way the end user can't reverse (such as a cheaper type of rear suspension, or something of that nature)

z31maniac
z31maniac SuperDork
3/2/11 11:07 a.m.

^No, there is pretty much no justification for a $30k "sports car" to have less hp than basically any other car sold.

oldeskewltoy
oldeskewltoy Reader
3/2/11 11:13 a.m.

all this hype.........

I'm not trading in my 170hp rwd Toyota for that POS

ReverendDexter
ReverendDexter SuperDork
3/2/11 11:13 a.m.
SilverFleet wrote: I still think that thing is going to end up FWD and be the replacement for the Camry Solara, that is, if it ever comes out at all. I just don't trust today's Toyota.

Good thing that Subaru is making it, too, huh? Subaru has shown the drivetrain already, and if this car goes into production, it will be RWD, no ifs, ands, or butts.

The only questions remaining are if they will cancel it at the last minute, what it weighs, and how much it'll cost.

92CelicaHalfTrac
92CelicaHalfTrac SuperDork
3/2/11 11:17 a.m.
z31maniac wrote: ^No, there is pretty much no justification for a $30k "sports car" to have less hp than basically any other car sold.

Even less than the new tC, i think. Because THAT makes sense.

scardeal
scardeal HalfDork
3/2/11 11:18 a.m.

If it's $30k with a 170HP lump... The price/performance ratio of that would not be worth it, unless it weighed 2000 lbs +- 50.

I'd either take a Miata instead (similar HP, less weight likely, less $$) or a 370Z (way more HP, similar weight, similar $$)

I would say $25k, 200HP sounds acceptable

rogerbvonceg
rogerbvonceg Reader
3/2/11 11:27 a.m.
Raze wrote: The front/quarter/rear shots are all flattering but the side on shot is disturbing. The car is FUGLY when viewed from the side. The rear is far too tall, the cockpit is bubbly to say the least, yet the front end is nice and sleek? it's like a G35 sedan smacked into a Ferrari, half hatchback with a pretty nose, nobody's making a proper rear anymore. Sad.

I resoundingly disagree:

SilverFleet
SilverFleet HalfDork
3/2/11 11:28 a.m.
ReverendDexter wrote:
SilverFleet wrote: I still think that thing is going to end up FWD and be the replacement for the Camry Solara, that is, if it ever comes out at all. I just don't trust today's Toyota.
Good thing that Subaru is making it, too, huh? Subaru has shown the drivetrain already, and if this car goes into production, it *will* be RWD, no ifs, ands, or butts. The only questions remaining are if they will cancel it at the last minute, what it weighs, and how much it'll cost.

I've seen the Subaru concept versions, and I still think it will still end up all stupid. This is Toyota we are talking about. They forgot how to make sports cars somewhere in the 90's, with the exception of the MR-S. I understand that they want to get more serious with the sporty stuff, but I won't believe it until I see it.

1 2 3

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
3BPt0BvCYQRWdbxntobaRmKT7iiHh6pJKAXBr7CE5VuFtkp6emVt39w0k21z5fXj