andrave
andrave Dork
1/23/13 9:22 p.m.

Not mine. love these cars though. always thought they made compelling money pit/timewaster project idea.

1972 Opel GT no engine...have title...asking $500.00 if interested call or text 717 three zero zero 9106..located in waynebsoro, pa 17268

wlkelley3
wlkelley3 SuperDork
1/24/13 11:59 a.m.

By the looks of it, you would need both of the pictured GTs to make one complete body.

Gearheadotaku
Gearheadotaku UltraDork
1/24/13 12:19 p.m.

Ecotech Turbo would be sweet in there

andrave
andrave Dork
1/24/13 2:51 p.m.

yeah it does appear to be missing the nose cone. not sure what the deal is with that. these cars have such nice lines, I love their styling. always amazed how tiny they are when I see them in real life.

I wonder what a cumins would look like in one.

RossD
RossD UberDork
1/24/13 2:59 p.m.
andrave
andrave Dork
1/24/13 3:09 p.m.

I don't get that. When you sell something, just say what you think its worth. Maybe if youre firm on the price. But the whole "this is $1100 in parts and its only $500" is bs. Especially when he says its worth a minimum of $700 and wants $600 for it. $100 isn't worth my time to get it, take it apart, and sell the pieces.
Besides, parts or no parts, that car is probably priced above what its worth... I don't know why but when they sell the opel's go for nothing. why is that anyway?

wlkelley3
wlkelley3 SuperDork
1/24/13 9:40 p.m.
RossD wrote: another one

There is just so-o-o-o much wrong with that ad. First being no GTs in 67. There were a few titled as 68 but officially 69 was the first year. Second, all GT hoods are louvered. That spoiler they added interferes with the gas cap, would be hard to refuel since it's under the spoiler. Could go on. I guess owning a GT makes me critical and protrective. But doesn't look to be in too bad a shape, at least not rusty in places shown. Agree about the parts ranting. Hate it when people do that. If the parts are worth that much then part it out yourself or else don't mention it.

Swank Force One
Swank Force One MegaDork
1/24/13 9:42 p.m.

I want the second one for f2t shens. My question is, is there even a decently strong irs rear you can fit under these things?

oldopelguy
oldopelguy Dork
1/25/13 12:03 a.m.
andrave wrote: yeah it does appear to be missing the nose cone. not sure what the deal is with that.

The battery mounts in front of the radiator up in the nose. Any acid dissolves the belly pan.

mndsm
mndsm PowerDork
1/25/13 12:17 a.m.
Swank Force One wrote: I want the second one for f2t shens. My question is, is there even a decently strong irs rear you can fit under these things?

Jag inboard that all the rod guys use comes to mind.

andrave
andrave Dork
1/25/13 8:18 a.m.

not sure on width but the nissan 240sx is not a wide car... also has IRS.

wlkelley3
wlkelley3 SuperDork
1/25/13 11:40 a.m.
oldopelguy wrote:
andrave wrote: yeah it does appear to be missing the nose cone. not sure what the deal is with that.
The battery mounts in front of the radiator up in the nose. Any acid dissolves the belly pan.

And add that the car is low enough that the front bangs on bumps getting dented. I would guess combination of both.

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
DVZOa3BneZAt7ScXpe4ehYqpFdDGak1kHhVOl0JPRXQjWFMWVw8J4ylMaBwb7Ti8