rmarkc
rmarkc Reader
5/18/10 5:21 p.m.
Spinout007
Spinout007 Dork
5/18/10 6:26 p.m.

I love it when they put "IT'S A FAST CAR!" in the description. I guess it's better than adult owned and riden for a motorcycle, I mean seriously, I've been on the back of my dad's wing approaching a buck fitty while he's screwing with some guy in a mustang.....Geez adult riden....

MrJoshua
MrJoshua SuperDork
5/18/10 6:35 p.m.

I do love me some SE-R, but "Quick" is a much more accurate description.

nutherjrfan
nutherjrfan Reader
5/19/10 9:20 a.m.

http://washingtondc.craigslist.org/mld/cto/1744568293.html i'll take your 92 and raise you a 91. not mine, and god it's killing me not to spend my money right now, especially on a cool old nissan.

NGTD
NGTD HalfDork
5/19/10 12:17 p.m.

Too bad you can't import them to Canada.

nutherjrfan
nutherjrfan Reader
5/19/10 1:07 p.m.

wow! why? that's major unfair, but it does make up for y'all being able to import Integrales and the like.

NGTD
NGTD HalfDork
5/19/10 1:24 p.m.
nutherjrfan wrote: wow! why? that's major unfair, but it does make up for y'all being able to import Integrales and the like.

They are on a "banned" list with RIV (Registrar of Imported Vehicles). I am not sure why, but I think it is those crazy motorized seat belts you had in the USA.

speedblind
speedblind Reader
5/19/10 3:39 p.m.
nutherjrfan wrote: http://washingtondc.craigslist.org/mld/cto/1744568293.html i'll take your 92 and raise you a 91. not mine, and god it's killing me not to spend my money right now, especially on a cool old nissan.

Oh wow. Always wanted one. Emailed the seller.

Thanks!

matt147
matt147 New Reader
5/19/10 7:42 p.m.
NGTD wrote: Too bad you can't import them to Canada.

Yes you can. I personally drove one up to Niagara Falls for a Canadian friend who legally imported it.

NGTD
NGTD HalfDork
5/19/10 9:06 p.m.
matt147 wrote:
NGTD wrote: Too bad you can't import them to Canada.
Yes you can. I personally drove one up to Niagara Falls for a Canadian friend who legally imported it.

Maybe now since they are older than 15 years, but:

Vehicles equipped with passive restraints do not meet CMVSS 210, seat belt anchorage location requirements. Passive restraints are identified as either a motorized upper torso restraint or door mounted 3-point restraint

Clay
Clay Reader
5/20/10 2:29 p.m.

Yeah, my 92 had the door mounted seatbelts. I DO NOT trust them as my Dad was thrown from my 92 while belted in when the door opened up during a crash.

matt147
matt147 New Reader
5/21/10 9:54 p.m.
NGTD wrote: Maybe now since they are older than 15 years, but: Vehicles equipped with passive restraints do not meet CMVSS 210, seat belt anchorage location requirements. Passive restraints are identified as either a motorized upper torso restraint or door mounted 3-point restraint

Yes I believe the 15 year law was the reason they can be legally imported now.

matt147
matt147 New Reader
5/21/10 9:56 p.m.
Clay wrote: Yeah, my 92 had the door mounted seatbelts. I DO NOT trust them as my Dad was thrown from my 92 while belted in when the door opened up during a crash.

I remember that Clay. :( I never trusted the door mounted belts in my SE-R after hearing what happened. I swapped in B14 b-pillar mounted belts into my B13 SE-R and they were much, much, better and safer too imho.

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
gcCpTocLiwnfGB42YnFaSd45fNpkRePuwC1jJKHTluuGA0zv6a1i2iBKLszfIjH3