The_Jed
The_Jed Dork
3/2/13 4:30 a.m.

Definitely NMNA!

http://springfieldil.craigslist.org/cto/3650740510.html

Spinout007
Spinout007 SuperDork
3/2/13 4:41 a.m.

Interesting... that dash looks better than I was expecting.

Ranger50
Ranger50 UberDork
3/2/13 7:12 a.m.

Ruined all the way around.

petegossett
petegossett UberDork
3/2/13 9:17 a.m.

I agree I think it looks good in pictures, and the dash is ok too. But why all that work for a V6?

Spinout007
Spinout007 SuperDork
3/2/13 11:35 a.m.

That was my other question

singleslammer
singleslammer Dork
3/2/13 11:49 a.m.

Seems like a lot of work for the crappy version of the crappy ford 3.8L. However you could swap to the later heads for more power or top swap the whole mess for the S/C parts (I think you can do this right?). It looks ok and I would give him 1500 for it assuming it isn't a rusty pile like most mustangs of that vintage in the midwest.

Edit: Automatic. No offer even in theory.

Sil80redtop
Sil80redtop New Reader
3/2/13 2:17 p.m.

That's not an 85 front end, is it?

fast_eddie_72
fast_eddie_72 UltraDork
3/2/13 2:22 p.m.

In reply to Sil80redtop:

No, and neither are the rear side windows. I've seen people "update" Mustangs. Could be. Just seems odd.

turbojunker
turbojunker HalfDork
3/2/13 2:22 p.m.
Sil80redtop wrote: That's not an 85 front end, is it?

No, and neither are the quarter windows. Seeing four eye cars updated makes me sad

Sil80redtop
Sil80redtop New Reader
3/2/13 3:16 p.m.

Oh yeah. 1/4 windows should have moldings on the aft section.

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
9lU9NRA1IxmK1KYRu9416vV2QaUyVCdI4u7o9pyvsr7XToF66WjfeI7YaGzPMZhn