Keith Tanner
Keith Tanner MegaDork
2/7/17 2:28 p.m.

254

Because an Italian mistress is just looking for a reason to make you crazy.

corsepervita
corsepervita Reader
2/7/17 2:33 p.m.
Keith Tanner wrote: 254 Because an Italian mistress is just looking for a reason to make you crazy.

LOL! I wouldn't be surprised if it does something like that to piss me off.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/fa6Kv1fOStM

petegossett
petegossett UltimaDork
2/7/17 2:44 p.m.

299

hemihauler20
hemihauler20 New Reader
2/7/17 2:56 p.m.

In reply to corsepervita:

I'm going against the grain here so my guess will be 292.5 haha

grover
grover New Reader
2/7/17 3:33 p.m.

I'll go 261 for this test and expect it to go much higher once everything is tuned completely.

oldeskewltoy
oldeskewltoy UltraDork
2/7/17 3:50 p.m.
corsepervita wrote:
Keith Tanner wrote: 254 Because an Italian mistress is just looking for a reason to make you crazy.
LOL! I wouldn't be surprised if it does something like that to piss me off. https://www.youtube.com/embed/fa6Kv1fOStM

254 @ the wheels is pretty good... figure a 10% drivetrain loss and you are 282 crank hp....

A LOT of work went into this engine... BUT the question is how much power. Initial tune 267@ the wheels, with a final tune coming in around the 275 mark

hhaase
hhaase Reader
2/7/17 4:08 p.m.

Ok, I'll be the dark cloud. Initial tune around 230hp. Too many new variables on the build so my guess is the timing will be conservative and the mixture rich. On a build this deep, and this new, break-in procedure is more important than performance.

Once all the bugs are worked out, ignition is finished, and tune is stable I'm betting around 295 at the wheels.

-Hans

NOHOME
NOHOME PowerDork
2/7/17 4:26 p.m.

269 just cause prime number.

corsepervita
corsepervita Reader
2/7/17 4:36 p.m.
oldeskewltoy wrote:
corsepervita wrote:
Keith Tanner wrote: 254 Because an Italian mistress is just looking for a reason to make you crazy.
LOL! I wouldn't be surprised if it does something like that to piss me off. https://www.youtube.com/embed/fa6Kv1fOStM
254 @ the wheels is pretty good... figure a 10% drivetrain loss and you are 282 crank hp.... A LOT of work went into this engine... BUT the question is how much power. Initial tune 267@ the wheels, with a final tune coming in around the 275 mark

Remember, this isn't at the wheels, this is on an engine dyno!

cmcgregor
cmcgregor Dork
2/7/17 4:51 p.m.

In case anyone would like a Jalpa of their very own.....On BAT with 67k(!!) miles

Don49
Don49 HalfDork
2/7/17 4:56 p.m.

I'm in at 302 hp. I'm an optimist!!

wheelsmithy
wheelsmithy Dork
2/7/17 5:09 p.m.

I wanna play. 272 initial tune.

corsepervita
corsepervita Reader
2/7/17 5:21 p.m.
cmcgregor wrote: In case anyone would like a Jalpa of their very own.....On BAT with 67k(!!) miles

FYI there is no "timing belt" on them as they are timing chain. But there is a belt that used a ferrari timing belt that turns the distributor and alternator that is a toothed belt. It provides no mechanical risk to anything like interference motor failure, etc, again, as it only turns the alternator/distributor.

My biggest, most important question to the seller on that would be: "What coolant did you use and when were the head gaskets replaced?" The largest failure I've seen on any number of them has been due to the head gasket material, non-aluminum friendly coolant, the gaskets peeling back, and then the heads beginning the horrific process of pitting. In which case, is a ticking time bomb.

Because reasons:

BrokenYugo
BrokenYugo MegaDork
2/7/17 5:46 p.m.

I'll guess 280 at the flywheel assuming the factory spec is also flywheel.

corsepervita
corsepervita Reader
2/7/17 5:47 p.m.
BrokenYugo wrote: I'll guess 280 at the flywheel assuming the factory spec is also flywheel.

If memory serves, that was indeed, at the flywheel. I like this game!

OHSCrifle
OHSCrifle Dork
2/7/17 6:21 p.m.

263

dculberson
dculberson PowerDork
2/7/17 6:55 p.m.

I wanted 288 but it's been taken twice. So, 289. :)

clutchsmoke
clutchsmoke SuperDork
2/7/17 8:59 p.m.

271 shall be my number. No more, no less.

Indy-Guy
Indy-Guy Dork
2/7/17 9:09 p.m.

I've really enjoyed following along as you've progressed here.

My guess is 287 hp.

corsepervita
corsepervita Reader
2/7/17 10:14 p.m.

Some assembly porn. Most splendid.

Petrolburner
Petrolburner Dork
2/8/17 9:37 a.m.

Japanese gentleman's agreement at 276.

mblommel
mblommel HalfDork
2/8/17 9:48 a.m.
cmcgregor wrote: In case anyone would like a Jalpa of their very own.....On BAT with 67k(!!) miles

OMG those wheels.

QuasiMofo
QuasiMofo MegaDork
2/8/17 10:03 a.m.

With better fuel control and spark and the increased efficiency of a "better built engine" I will also put the crank horsepower at a nick over 300.

GuessiMofo submits 301.7

corsepervita
corsepervita Reader
2/8/17 10:34 a.m.
mblommel wrote:
cmcgregor wrote: In case anyone would like a Jalpa of their very own.....On BAT with 67k(!!) miles
OMG those wheels.

Those are silhouette wheels. I'd like to get some myself.

corsepervita
corsepervita Reader
2/8/17 10:52 a.m.

Alright y'all, to make this easier, I've gone ahead and made a sheet with everyone's guesses. We have a couple of duplicates in there. But this will help you see what people have guessed. I'll update this daily until dyno day.

Jalpa Guestimation Game

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
JyXOEiH0BBPHKKhpdWNkF9SrwzvwnxK4MpnSNAPtpuPNKxkXHR3tBOovAFUk4wbq