254
Because an Italian mistress is just looking for a reason to make you crazy.
Keith Tanner wrote: 254 Because an Italian mistress is just looking for a reason to make you crazy.
LOL! I wouldn't be surprised if it does something like that to piss me off.
corsepervita wrote:Keith Tanner wrote: 254 Because an Italian mistress is just looking for a reason to make you crazy.LOL! I wouldn't be surprised if it does something like that to piss me off. https://www.youtube.com/embed/fa6Kv1fOStM
254 @ the wheels is pretty good... figure a 10% drivetrain loss and you are 282 crank hp....
A LOT of work went into this engine... BUT the question is how much power. Initial tune 267@ the wheels, with a final tune coming in around the 275 mark
Ok, I'll be the dark cloud. Initial tune around 230hp. Too many new variables on the build so my guess is the timing will be conservative and the mixture rich. On a build this deep, and this new, break-in procedure is more important than performance.
Once all the bugs are worked out, ignition is finished, and tune is stable I'm betting around 295 at the wheels.
-Hans
oldeskewltoy wrote:corsepervita wrote:254 @ the wheels is pretty good... figure a 10% drivetrain loss and you are 282 crank hp.... A LOT of work went into this engine... BUT the question is how much power. Initial tune 267@ the wheels, with a final tune coming in around the 275 markKeith Tanner wrote: 254 Because an Italian mistress is just looking for a reason to make you crazy.LOL! I wouldn't be surprised if it does something like that to piss me off. https://www.youtube.com/embed/fa6Kv1fOStM
Remember, this isn't at the wheels, this is on an engine dyno!
In case anyone would like a Jalpa of their very own.....On BAT with 67k(!!) miles
cmcgregor wrote: In case anyone would like a Jalpa of their very own.....On BAT with 67k(!!) miles
FYI there is no "timing belt" on them as they are timing chain. But there is a belt that used a ferrari timing belt that turns the distributor and alternator that is a toothed belt. It provides no mechanical risk to anything like interference motor failure, etc, again, as it only turns the alternator/distributor.
My biggest, most important question to the seller on that would be: "What coolant did you use and when were the head gaskets replaced?" The largest failure I've seen on any number of them has been due to the head gasket material, non-aluminum friendly coolant, the gaskets peeling back, and then the heads beginning the horrific process of pitting. In which case, is a ticking time bomb.
Because reasons:
BrokenYugo wrote: I'll guess 280 at the flywheel assuming the factory spec is also flywheel.
If memory serves, that was indeed, at the flywheel. I like this game!
cmcgregor wrote: In case anyone would like a Jalpa of their very own.....On BAT with 67k(!!) miles
OMG those wheels.
With better fuel control and spark and the increased efficiency of a "better built engine" I will also put the crank horsepower at a nick over 300.
GuessiMofo submits 301.7
mblommel wrote:cmcgregor wrote: In case anyone would like a Jalpa of their very own.....On BAT with 67k(!!) milesOMG those wheels.
Those are silhouette wheels. I'd like to get some myself.
You'll need to log in to post.