needs more box flare
needs more box flare
Would be a lot better to my eye if the rear side glass was still there. Looks like a small sedan delivery, but not in a good way.
I've actually been watching this classified for a while. Almost posted it as a "Classic Motorsports Car Catcher" on classicmotorsports.com but it just a little too weird for that. Definitely interesting, though.
seems to be a bumper crop of interesting Bgt's in MN right now.
In reply to Fueled by Caffeine:
Yep, I like that much better.
The box flares are cool but the panel van look of the first is killing it for me. Also, no engine bay shots on a swap car?! Seriously?!
V6 conversion - fine; I have a friend who built one of these and uses it as a DD.
Box flares - also fine...
Filling in the 3/4 windows - WTF??? That just looks terrible... 
In reply to Ed Higginbotham:
Yes... Definitely interesting. Very odd that the flares are only on the back, interesting choices on that car.
Fueled by Caffeine wrote: nmna kinda neato
It should be a requirement that any engine swapped car, MUST have a pic of the engine bay..... But I guess you can't fix all the list of Craigs problems.
Have we considered the possibility that all the above posts are related...?
Perhaps it's a transverse FWD V6 mounted back there - hence the rear-only box flares, blanked quarter windows, and lack of under-bonnet pictures.
MGB Clio GT, anyone?
I love sedan deliveries.
I don't love that.
In reply to Duke:
Perhaps... but if you were trying to sell a mid-engine converted MGB GT - even with minimal details - wouldn't you at least mention the "mid-engine" part?
In reply to Duke:
possibly.. still a weirdo car.. thought you all would enjoy seeing it
In reply to Fueled by Caffeine:
We always enjoy seeing strange cars. Even if we don't like it.
You'll need to log in to post.
