http://youtu.be/hxUGqceKAqc
Thought you guys might like it.
eastpark wrote: It's really cool, but I wonder how hard it'll be to fabricate a good looking interior for it?
Considering the difference is from the c-pillar back, I wouldn't think it would be too hard to trim a wagon cargo area to match the rest of the car.
I totally dig it. Shooting brakes/two-door wagons are way under appreciated.
How they going to seal the door window to the B-pillar? There is room for a quarter glass but will it be fixed or slide up and down?
Hmmm, can we shorten the the rear section 6"? I'm not quite sure, but for some reason the rear just looks a bit too long....
and just too be different... maybe run a 1000 hp 2JZ instead of the typical LSx
Why am i thinking that i would want the powertrain from a volt under it. Not the only option of course but it came to mind.
dean1484 wrote: Why am i thinking that i would want the powertrain from a volt under it. Not the only option of course but it came to mind.
That's the last thing that I'd have thought of.
I like it!
Kinda like a chevy shooting brake or something. I'm with oldeskewltoy in that the rear looks just a tad too long. Much better work than I could've done, so no complaints for me. I'd drive it the snot out of it.
dean1484 wrote: Why am i thinking that i would want the powertrain from a volt under it. Not the only option of course but it came to mind.
nope... it needs to be on a 4X4 Blazer chassis with Dana 60's front and rear...
To me, it has a Vista Cruiser vibe to it... which would be awesome if it were a Firebird.
Never mind.
oldeskewltoy wrote: Hmmm, can we shorten the the rear section 6"? I'm not quite sure, but for some reason the rear just looks a bit too long.... and just too be different... maybe run a 1000 hp 2JZ instead of the typical LSx
I didn't think it looked a bit too long, until you posted this. You're right, just a bit shorter and I think the proportions would be moar great.
You'll need to log in to post.