The new Corolla GR should have a mid engined TRD version.
Hardtop convertible 2 door hatch (one LONG folding roof) with RWD based 4WD like Nissan's in the G35x. One car to do almost all.
Peabody said:A simple 2dr hatch with a manual trans would be nice.
Sadly, even Ford UK is discontinuing the 3 door Fiesta.
How about an actual compact pickup? New Rangers and Colorados are as big as GMT400s and the F150s of the 90s.
AND BRING UTES TO NORTH AMERICA!
The 510 like Datsun already mentioned. And something like the S2000. Basically a larger, more powerful Miata that is still relatively affordable.
If Subaru can build a what seems to be a 240hp or so, 2.4 liter boxer, it would be cool to see what Honda could do with a 2.5L 4cyl.
Some sort of factory sporty version of the XP90-chassis (2005-2010) Toyota Yaris hatchback, maybe with the 1ZZ instead of the 1NZ.
I can't think of a category that has not already been tried.
Lifted 2-Door sports coupe? Yes, the X-90 was kinda in that slot, but was more CUV than lifted car. The new Ferrari pur-o-slang looks like a coupe, but is a 4-door. But Porsche recently introduced the 911 Dakar, so that slot is now filled.
Convertible SUV? the Murano Cross Cabriolet.
Electric pickups? F-150 and Rivian.
I guess that leaves high performance diesel sports car? No one wants that.
Adrian_Thompson (Forum Supporter) said:Mazda would've had much better vehicles if they had put real engines in the RX7/RX8 instead of spinning triangles of no torque, no reliability, and excessive noise in them.
After that, it just needs one more thing...
Modern Astro Van , real chassis , rear wheel drive V6 , towing package
Toyota has this size van in Asia
Curtis73 (Forum Supporter) said:How about an actual compact pickup? New Rangers and Colorados are as big as GMT400s and the F150s of the 90s.
AND BRING UTES TO NORTH AMERICA!
El Camino and Ranchero....
Yes, I miss small basic trucks too...
How a new car/truck that regular people can actually afford? Out the door for under 20k....
What happened to interoirs? Even the cheapest cars in the 70s and 80s got a padded armrest and a vynil covered door card. Didn't take much to option up to a fabric one either. Now everything is hard molded plastic unless you spent 80k..
californiamilleghia said:Modern Astro Van , real chassis , rear wheel drive V6 , towing package
Toyota has this size van in Asia
Low roof Ford Transit?
The low roof Transit is cool , I guess we could add the Transit flatbed and all the other options they have in Europe ,
But an Astro is not as wide as a full size Chevy Express van or the Transit, just makes it easier to drive around town and park but still has a lot of space inside.
californiamilleghia said:The low roof Transit is cool , I guess we could add the Transit flatbed and all the other options they have in Europe ,
But an Astro is not as wide as a full size Chevy Express van or the Transit, just makes it easier to drive around town and park but still has a lot of space inside.
The Transit is ~3 inches wider than the Astro. Not sure that you'd really notice the difference. The length would be a bigger adjustment I'd think (but longer wheelbase might be more comfortable towing).
And you can get a "cutaway" transit and put whatever bed or workbody on it that you want:
Two from the modern Ford camp:
A Ford Mustang with the GT350 suspension, GT350 carbon fiber wheels and bodywork, 2.3L EcoBoost engine, electric motors for torque vectoring on the front wheels, and an electric torque-filling motor between the engine and trans. When Ford first announced the Mustang Mach E name, this was what my mind jumped to.
A more hardcore Ford Focus ST to bridge the gap between the ST and the RS. Leave the horsepower alone and leave it FWD, but add a mechanical LSD, the bigger brakes off the RS, and some more aggressive suspension tuning.
Peabody said:A simple 2dr hatch with a manual trans would be nice.
With rear wheel drive. Something like a hatchback FRS with an inline engine or a modern version of the FB and FC RX-7 or 944.
Tom1200 said:A small car that is quiet inside; I love hot hatches but a boomy interior adds nothing to the experience.
First generation Volvo S40 or Infiniti G20. A friend had a G20, I had an S40. Not hatches, but still "executive compact".
I agree, this is a woefully underpopulated market segment. There was also thr 318ti, which was kind of a tinny E36 M3box, and the C230 Compact, and I say "the" because I think they sold one here
A minivan version of the Ford Maverick.
The Maverick is already nearly minivan exterior dimensions, just with less usable interior and cargo space. A minivan with the Ecoboost and AWD options would be sweet.
Pete. (l33t FS) said:Tom1200 said:A small car that is quiet inside; I love hot hatches but a boomy interior adds nothing to the experience.
First generation Volvo S40 or Infiniti G20. A friend had a G20, I had an S40. Not hatches, but still "executive compact".
I agree, this is a woefully underpopulated market segment. There was also thr 318ti, which was kind of a tinny E36 M3box, and the C230 Compact, and I say "the" because I think they sold one here
Those really aren't small; I'm talking Honda Fit, Mazda 2 size things.
In reply to Datsun310Guy :
If everything old becomes new again, when do rear window louvers come back?
Tom1200 said:Pete. (l33t FS) said:Tom1200 said:A small car that is quiet inside; I love hot hatches but a boomy interior adds nothing to the experience.
First generation Volvo S40 or Infiniti G20. A friend had a G20, I had an S40. Not hatches, but still "executive compact".
I agree, this is a woefully underpopulated market segment. There was also thr 318ti, which was kind of a tinny E36 M3box, and the C230 Compact, and I say "the" because I think they sold one here
Those really aren't small; I'm talking Honda Fit, Mazda 2 size things.
I do agree! But "small" is kind of relative, too. The G20 was effectively a B13 SE-R. The S40 was a Dodge Colt/Mitsubishi Mirage(LanEvo III )
The problem is that it doesn't cost much more to make a large car as a small one. So the profit margins are razor thin on small cars, if not actually negative. People might balk at a $50,000 Fit. People only spend that kind of money on a Civic if they throw a lot of wings and ugly trim and nostalgia at them.
It took SAAB-type people to spend large money on boring yet high quality smallish 4 cylinder cars, and look what that got SAAB.
You'll need to log in to post.