Edmunds 100 Most Beautiful Cars

Discuss.

100-97 makes me weep for this list.

Yeah, the whole list is a bunch of suck.

This is #1, should tell you how much fail there is

not saying it's ugly, but to say its the best ever is nuts.

LOL. WTF?!? That list was horrible.

All the way down at 65?

Holy berkeleyball they are blind.

Warning to anyone about to click on that list it is a terrible waste of time and just Edmunds attempting to get people to look at their site.

IDK. Shouldn't the 911 be top three? Shouldn't the e30 m3 be top 20?

2012 Audi RS5...what the? seriously? are you berklying kidding me? Thats like, an amaaaazingly epic fail

bravenrace wrote: Discuss.

Edmunds = ghey.

/thread

4cylndrfury wrote: 2012 Audi RS5...what the? seriously? are you berklying kidding me? Thats like, an amaaaazingly epic fail

I errrr... "pop a tent" every time i see an RS5 or S5, so i'm cool with that one.

Taiden wrote: IDK. Shouldn't the 911 be top three? Shouldn't the e30 m3 be top 20?

No.

Don't get me wrong I would love either one but I wouldn't put them in the top 20. I mean the 911 styling is fairly boring IMHO. The E30 M3 is too plain in base form and just has big fender flares and the like added.

Irrelevant list is irrelevant!

4cylndrfury wrote:

bravenrace wrote: Discuss.

Edmunds = ghey. /thread

I'm with this guy...

Interesting list, lots of cool cars but far from the top 100 most beautiful.

93EXCivic wrote:

Taiden wrote: IDK. Shouldn't the 911 be top three? Shouldn't the e30 m3 be top 20?

No. Don't get me wrong I would love either one but I wouldn't put them in the top 20. I mean the 911 styling is fairly boring IMHO. The E30 M3 is too plain in base form and just has big fender flares and the like added.

Maybe the edmunds list was designed so everyone could disagree, since we all would anyway no matter what the list.

The Toyota 2000GT is like 95? I didn't bother reading any further.

maybe "we" should come up with our own list!!

to begin with I'd start with most of the cars that were in the exhibit "The Allure of the Automobile" - http://www.google.com/search?q=allure+of+the+automobile&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&oe=&um=1&ie=UTF-8&hl=en&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi&ei=m0RNT9m5LOajiALn9J3LDw&biw=1340&bih=794&sei=pURNT6b8H8miiQKfye3ODw

No Talbot Lago T150C? No Ferrari 212 Inter Vignale?

All that needs to be said about this list is that the blind moronic idiots put the NISSAN 300ZX above the FD RX-7.

This list is so much trash it's not even ironically funny.

Taiden wrote:

93EXCivic wrote:

Taiden wrote: IDK. Shouldn't the 911 be top three? Shouldn't the e30 m3 be top 20?

No. Don't get me wrong I would love either one but I wouldn't put them in the top 20. I mean the 911 styling is fairly boring IMHO. The E30 M3 is too plain in base form and just has big fender flares and the like added.

Maybe the edmunds list was designed so everyone could disagree, since we all would anyway no matter what the list.

I think don't think anyone would agree with anyone else one else on the 100.

I thought that it was funny that the 911 appears in diffrent forms throughout the list

I am working on a list of the top 100 cars that randomly picked based on my ability to think of specific cars.. Please consider my list as the authoritative word on cars.

No Ferrari 275 GTB????

No 308, no 944, no Bora? Lame.