Which is better? (Ignore wheels if you can.)
A)
or B)
A
To me, B looks like the result of a 17 year old who just got his bonus check for being a standout employee at McDonalds.
EDIT: Duke put it well too...it's just significantly overscaled. I like wild styling, and often really like the factory jobs that are over the top, but this just looks all wrong.
B looks nothing like a Subaru, if anything it looks like an Evo III/IV conglomeration that was left in the sun too long.
A is better in my eyes. B's front bumper is too bulgy and round to fit with the boxiness of the rest of the car. B looks slapped together, A looks clean.
I like elements of both. The huge fogs are killer, but I prefer the simple grill and openings of A, along with the rain guards of B and the hood. I'm a sucker for a vented hood, if done proper. OVERALL- I think if given the pure choice, I'd go with A and figure out a way to french in the fogs, or run an rally pod.
mad_machine wrote: if I could have B without the bulging fogs.. I would be all over it. As it sits, A
Option B without bulging fogs is Option A.
The only exterior differences on these cars is bumper, grill, and hood.
There's other bumpers available, but i think the other ones look kinda awkward. (There's a 2 hole version of Option A.)
B is a Familia GTR or clone.
I am a sucker for rally cars. That look works on an Evo VI, but not so much on the Mazda. Honestly I like the stealth look on A.
I didn't even notice the rain guards haha. This is really about the bumper/grill.
I can't run the hood vents on option "B" anyways.
You'll need to log in to post.