I like B except for the vents on the hood.
Rad_Capz wrote: A, because it'd be easier to sell off.
Don't worry, i'll put Ferd valve covers on it for you.
Though... if we were talking specifically these two cars.... Car "B" would bring about 3-4x the price of Car A, and sell in half the time.
One is a homogolation special. One isn't.
In this case, i'm only after looks, though. Personally i leaned towards Option A, but enough of my friends told me i was nuts to feel curious enough to take a poll.
B unless being used for rally or rallyx; I love the GTR look. But for rally related fun I would mount the fogs in a pod higher to avoid damage.
singleslammer wrote: A, B is too much. That Mazda isn't doing rally duty so that front end is overkill
oh really?
I believe all the people choosing option A severely lack taste and are repressing some serious psychological issues stemming from their early childhood. Likely someone stole their cookies
Nick_Comstock wrote: I believe all the people choosing option A severely lack taste and are repressing some serious psychological issues stemming from their early childhood. Likely someone stole their cookies
But is it a hatchback?
I like A. I would probably fit some subtle fog lights in there somewhere.
B is cool but only if it goes crazy fast enough to back up the exaggerated look.
I've always been a fan of scoops, vents, bulges, spats, spoilers and flares. It's what appeals to me. Trans Am>firebird, WRX>Impreza, EVO>Lancer even if they had the exact same performance, I would choose the more aggressive looking car.
BlueInGreen44 wrote: I like A. I would probably fit some subtle fog lights in there somewhere. B is cool but only if it goes crazy fast enough to back up the exaggerated look.
Target weight/power = 2000lbs even, add ballast to get up to minimum class weight, and 300whp n/a.
You'll need to log in to post.