Sorry for the incoming novel.
We went through this a couple of years ago. The first step should be understanding what you want and how that aligns with what you're allowed to build. We live on 3 acres in a rural area. Still, we would've needed variances to build anything larger than half the sqft of our house. We would've needed a variance for anything over 14ft tall, and we would've needed a variance to have any part of the building closer to the main road than our house. Variances aren't a huge deal, but they do add some minimal cost, some time, and they give others a chance to object to your plans. Find out what your local government says you can/can't do and what can be done but will take more steps.
We ended up cutting a couple of feet off the porch (to meet the rule about sqft under roof), going with shorter walls/scissor trusses/low pitched roof (to give me over 12ft interior height without a monster tall building),and moving the building back a couple of feet (we just eyeballed the initial location and had to bump it back slightly) to avoid any need for variances.
Any outbuilding is going to be a balance between pure functionality, aesthetics and cost. We have a decent home in a pretty visible location. It was important to us that the shop not overpower the house in height or square footage, and we wanted it to look decent rather than like a warehouse or cheap agricultural building that might reduce the appeal of the house down the line. This required sacrificing some functionality, as well as adding some cost, but I think we ended up in a decent place.
The porch, windows, and fancier overhead doors all added some cost in the name of aesthetics. That meant less budget for other things. The shorter walls kept it from towering over the house (or needing a variance), but it means my overhead doors are only 8ft tall, so no monster trucks, big equipment or tall trailers/RVs. The multiple overhead doors give me some ability to pull through, but it's not ideal. Still, it's better than nothing and the layout of my lot and the location of the building really wouldn't have allowed anything else. Everything is a compromise.
The biggest thing that I'd change if doing it again would be extending the concrete apron from the current 2ft to about 10ft out of all of the overhead doors. As it is, tires track lots of gravel and things into the shop. I'll get more concrete poured at some point, but it would've been relatively cheap and easy to do during the initial pour.
General things to consider:
If you're on 5 acres, you probably have a well and septic rather than city utilities. That can make it difficult/impossible to do plumbing in a shop, or you have to add the shop's own well and septic which adds a ton of cost.
If you're in NY, having doors on the eave walls (like mine) will make it possible for all the snow on the roof to melt/fall off and pile up right in front of your overhead doors. This can be mitigated somewhat with gutters and proper snow guards on the roof but it should be considered. Gable end doors would prevent this, but may/may not be the right aesthetic or layout for you.
It's cheaper to build "up" than "out". Height is cheap to add, floor space is not. You'll have to weigh the benefits/drawbacks of each. 12ft height should accommodate most lifts. 12ft with scissor trusses would definitely leave plenty of room to spare. 10ft walls with scissor trusses like pictured above might be an option too, but it depends what your priorities are.
Keeping dimensions in increments of 4ft or 8ft can make things cheaper since many building materials come in those dimensions. That means less time to construct and less wasted material. I wanted a 30'x50' building. It was cheaper to build a 32'x48', and I ended up with 36 more sqft inside.
If you want the building to last, spend the extra money for decent overhangs, gutters, and proper grading/drainage including downspouts. There are even concrete forms that will prevent your posts from being below grade where they might rot.
In-floor heat gets rave reviews, but to do it right, you need to insulate under the entire slab, and also around the exposed perimeter or all of your heat leeches out where you don't want it. By the same token, the slab inside your building should be isolated from any exterior apron, porch, driveway, etc. This adds cost of course, and you have to find a contractor or concrete crew that's used to working with insulation, etc.
Pole framed construction gets you a weather tight building in a cost effective manner. That can give you time to finish the inside on your own as time/money allow (I'm still working on mine 3 years later). But, by the time you frame it out, insulate, add a bunch of electrical, wall sheeting of your choice, etc the cost benefit over traditional stick built pretty much disappears. So, if budget is tight now and you're willing/able to finish it to your desired specs over time, then a pole building has advantages. If you want it all done in one swoop, and can afford it all at once, then a stick-built with traditional footers might be the better option.