1 2 3
David S. Wallens
David S. Wallens Editorial Director
4/27/09 1:52 p.m.

The latest release from GM:

DETROIT -- General Motors (NYSE: GM) today presented an updated Viability Plan that will speed the reinvention of GM's U.S. operations into a leaner, more customer-focused, and more cost-competitive automaker.

The Viability Plan is included in an exchange offer whereby GM is offering certain bondholders shares of GM common stock and accrued interest in exchange for certain outstanding notes.

Revised Viability Plan goes further and faster

The Viability Plan announced today builds on the February 17 Viability Plan submitted to the U.S. Treasury. The revised Plan accelerates the timeline for a number of important actions and makes deeper cuts in several key areas of GM's operations, with the objective to make us a leaner, faster, and more customer-focused organization going forward.

Significant changes include:

A focus on four core brands in the U.S. - Chevrolet, Cadillac, Buick and GMC - with fewer nameplates and a more competitive level of marketing support per brand.

A more aggressive restructuring of GM's U.S. dealer organization to better focus dealer resources for improved sales and customer service.

Improved U.S. capacity utilization through accelerated idling and closures of powertrain, stamping, and assembly plants.

Lower structural costs, which GM North America (GMNA) projects will enable it to breakeven (on an adjusted EBIT basis) at a U.S. total industry volume of approximately 10 million vehicles, based on the pricing and share assumptions in the plan. This rate is substantially below the 15 to 17 million annual vehicle sales rates recorded from 1995 through 2007.

"We are taking tough but necessary actions that are critical to GM's long-term viability," said Fritz Henderson, GM president and CEO. "Our responsibility is clear - to secure GM's future - and we intend to succeed. At the same time, we also understand the impact these actions will have on our employees, dealers, unions, suppliers, shareholders, bondholders, and communities, and we will do whatever we can to mitigate the effects on the extended GM team."

Fewer U.S. brands, nameplates, and dealers

As part of the revised Viability Plan and the need to move faster and further, GM in the U.S. will focus its resources on four core brands, Chevrolet, Cadillac, Buick and GMC. The Pontiac brand will be phased out by the end of 2010. GM will offer a total of 34 nameplates in 2010, a reduction of 29 percent from 48 nameplates in 2008, reflecting both the reduction in brands and continued emphasis on fewer and stronger entries. This four-brand strategy will enable GM to better focus its new product development programs and provide more competitive levels of market support.

The revised plan moves up the resolution of Saab, Saturn, and Hummer to the end of 2009, at the latest. Updates on these brands will be provided as these initiatives progress.

Working with its dealers, GM anticipates reducing its U.S. dealer count from 6,246 in 2008 to 3,605 by the end of 2010, a reduction of 42 percent. This is a further reduction of 500 dealers, and four years sooner, than in the February 17 Plan. The goal is to accomplish this reduction in an orderly, cost-effective, and customer-focused way. This reduction in U.S. dealers will allow for a more competitive dealer network and higher sales effectiveness in all markets. More details on these initiatives will be provided in May.

Sales volume and market share projections

The Viability Plan anticipates improved financial results despite more conservative U.S. sales volume expectations going forward. The lower volume expectations are the result of managing the business with fewer nameplates and dealers, leaner inventories, and reduced market share. To address the inventory issue, GM on April 23 announced U.S. production schedule reductions of approximately 190,000 vehicles during the second and early third quarters of 2009.

The Viability Plan also reduces GM's market share projections to adjust for the impact of the brand and dealer consolidation, as well as for the short-term impact of speculation regarding a GM bankruptcy. The plan assumes a 19.5 percent share in 2009, with share stabilizing in the 18.4 to 18.9 percent range in subsequent years.

"We have strong new product coming for our four core brands: the Chevrolet Camaro, Equinox, Cruze and Volt; Buick LaCrosse; GMC Terrain; and Cadillac SRX and CTS Sport Wagon and Coupe," said Henderson. "A tighter focus by GM and its dealers will help give these products the capital investment, marketing and advertising support they need to be truly successful."

Lower structural costs, lower breakeven point

The Viability Plan also lowers GMNA's breakeven volume to a U.S. annual industry volume of 10 million total vehicles, based on the pricing and share assumptions in the plan. This lower breakeven point (at an adjusted EBIT level) better positions GM to generate positive cash flow and earn an adequate return on capital over the course of a normal business cycle, a requirement set forth by the U.S. Treasury in its March 30 viability plan assessment.

GM will lower its breakeven point by cutting its structural costs faster and deeper than had previously been planned:

Manufacturing: Consistent with the mandate to accelerate restructuring, we plan to reduce the total number of assembly, powertrain, and stamping plants in the U.S. from 47 in 2008 to 34 by the end of 2010, a reduction of 28 percent, and to 31 by 2012. This would reflect the acceleration of six plant idling/closures from the February 17 plan, and one additional plant idling. Throughout this transition, GM will continue to implement its flexible global manufacturing strategy (GMS), which allows multiple body styles and architectures to be built in one plant. This enables GM to use its capital more efficiently, increase capacity utilization, and respond more quickly to market shifts.

Employment: U.S. hourly employment levels are projected to be reduced from about 61,000 in 2008 to 40,000 in 2010, a 34 percent reduction, and level off at about 38,000 starting in 2011. This further planned reduction of an additional 7,000 to 8,000 employees from the February 17 Plan is primarily the result of the previously discussed operational efficiencies, nameplate reductions, and plant closings. GM also anticipates a further decline in salaried and executive employment as it continues to assess its structure and execute the Viability Plan. More details will be announced as soon as they are finalized with the various stakeholders.

Labor costs: The Viability Plan assumes a reduction of U.S. hourly labor costs from $7.6 billion in 2008 to $5 billion in 2010, a 34 percent reduction. GM will continue to work with its UAW partners to accomplish this through a reduction in total U.S. hourly employment as well as through modifications in the collective bargaining agreement.

As a result of these and other actions, GMNA's structural costs are projected to decline 25 percent, from $30.8 billion in 2008 to $23.2 billion in 2010, a further decline of $1.8 billion by 2010 versus the February 17 Plan.

Strengthening GM's balance sheet

Another key element of GM's restructuring will be taking the necessary actions to strengthen its balance sheet. GM today took an important step in improving its balance sheet by launching a bond exchange offer for approximately $27 billion of its unsecured public debt. If successful, the bond exchange would result in the conversion of a large majority of this debt to equity.

"A stronger balance sheet would free the company to invest in the products and technologies of the future," Henderson said. "It will also help provide stability and security to our customers, our dealers, our employees, and our suppliers."

Another important part of improving the balance sheet will be the ongoing discussions with the UAW to modify the terms of the Voluntary Employee Benefit Association (VEBA), and with the U.S. Treasury regarding possible conversion of its debt to equity. The current bond exchange offer is conditioned on the converting to equity of at least 50 percent of GM's outstanding U.S. Treasury debt at June 1, 2009, and at least 50 percent of GM's future financial obligations to the new VEBA. GM expects a debt reduction of at least $20 billion between the two actions.

In total, the U.S. Treasury debt conversion, VEBA modification and bond exchange could result in at least $44 billion in debt reduction.

Throughout the Plan, GM will continue to make significant investment in future products and new technologies, with an investment of $5.4 billion in 2009, and investments ranging from $5.3 to $6.7 billion from 2010 to 2014. Very importantly, development and testing of the Chevy Volt extended-range electric car remains on track for start of production by the end of 2010 and arrival in Chevrolet dealer showrooms soon thereafter.

"The Viability Plan reflects the direction of President Obama and the U.S. Treasury that GM should go further and faster on our restructuring," Henderson said. "We appreciate their support and direction. This stronger, leaner business model will enable GM to keep doing what it does best - provide great new cars, trucks and crossovers to our customers, and continue to develop new advanced propulsion technologies that are vital for our country's economy and environment."

#

Nashco
Nashco SuperDork
4/27/09 2:01 p.m.
David S. Wallens wrote: The revised plan moves up the resolution of Saab, Saturn, and Hummer to the end of 2009, at the latest. Updates on these brands will be provided as these initiatives progress.

As noted, this was already in the game plan...the new news is that they're moving it forward from 2011 to 2009. I'm confused as to how they could execute that in such a short time frame, time will tell.

If you wanted a (fill in domestic car model here), now is probably the time.

Edit: This is especially true for you guys that keep saying, "I'd love to buy X in five years when they've depreciated!" The cars won't exist for you to get used, but the good news is there will be plenty of used Accords and Camrys to go around.

Bryce

Strizzo
Strizzo Dork
4/27/09 2:03 p.m.
Nashco wrote:
David S. Wallens wrote: The revised plan moves up the resolution of Saab, Saturn, and Hummer to the end of 2009, at the latest. Updates on these brands will be provided as these initiatives progress.
As noted, this was already in the game plan...the new news is that they're moving it forward from 2011 to 2009. I'm confused as to how they could execute that in such a short time frame, time will tell. If you wanted a (fill in domestic car model here), now is probably the time. Bryce

i wonder if i can get half off that sky redline or solstice coupe i've been eyeing now...

John Brown
John Brown SuperDork
4/27/09 2:07 p.m.

I have mentioned it before, but when the "NEW" Saturn corporation gets its freedom from GM they should offer to buy the Pontiac brand as well.

Strizzo
Strizzo Dork
4/27/09 2:08 p.m.
David S. Wallens wrote: ..., GM will offer a total of 34 nameplates in 2010, a reduction of 29 percent from 48 nameplates in 2008, reflecting both the reduction in brands and continued emphasis on fewer and stronger entries. This four-brand strategy will enable GM to better focus its new product development programs and provide more competitive levels of market support.

they're still going to be making 12 different cars, they'll just be putting fewer different badges on them. smoke and mirrors if you ask me...

the only companies that have unique cars are getting oldsmobiled, except for cadillac, but i think even they rebadge a few things

alfadriver
alfadriver Reader
4/27/09 2:48 p.m.
Strizzo wrote:
David S. Wallens wrote: ..., GM will offer a total of 34 nameplates in 2010, a reduction of 29 percent from 48 nameplates in 2008, reflecting both the reduction in brands and continued emphasis on fewer and stronger entries. This four-brand strategy will enable GM to better focus its new product development programs and provide more competitive levels of market support.
they're still going to be making 12 different cars, they'll just be putting fewer different badges on them. smoke and mirrors if you ask me... the only companies that have unique cars are getting oldsmobiled, except for cadillac, but i think even they rebadge a few things

Honestly, how is that different than what Honda/Acura does?

Or even most of Lexus/Toyota? (Nissan/Infinity, VW/Audi)

Everybody does it. Sadly, only Ford and GM normally get bashed for it. The rest we generally ignore.

Sad to see the experiment not fit into the new global structure, but I'm not even sold if the dealers could put together a plan that would make the cars so desireable that they could sell them for the required premium for profit.

Saturn was more different than most US cars, since they became Opals.

But, it does force the enthusiest crowd to really think how many (or not) of us are out there.

Eric

jstein77
jstein77 HalfDork
4/27/09 2:52 p.m.

I don't understand keeping GMC - Do they sell anything but rebadged Chevy trucks?

alfadriver
alfadriver Reader
4/27/09 3:01 p.m.
jstein77 wrote: I don't understand keeping GMC - Do they sell anything but rebadged Chevy trucks?

If it makes money, why does it matter? I think that's the point of today's annoucement- Pontiac, Saturn, and Hummer don't make money, and won't in a reasonable long term plan. OTOH, GMC does and will.

Gotta remember, the car industry isn't out to make enthusiests happy, it's out to make MONEY.

E-

ignorant
ignorant SuperDork
4/27/09 3:10 p.m.
alfadriver wrote:
jstein77 wrote: I don't understand keeping GMC - Do they sell anything but rebadged Chevy trucks?
If it makes money, why does it matter? I think that's the point of today's annoucement- Pontiac, Saturn, and Hummer don't make money, and won't in a reasonable long term plan. OTOH, GMC does and will. Gotta remember, the car industry isn't out to make enthusiests happy, it's out to make MONEY. E-

yup..

should have done this a long time ago.. poop or get off the pot.

P71
P71 Dork
4/27/09 3:16 p.m.

Pontiac made money until last year. You know, when GM saddled them with the G3 and G5...

Honestly, I wish somebody would buy Holden, Opel, Saturn, and Pontiac and make a bad-ass GM competitor out of it.

mtn
mtn Dork
4/27/09 3:37 p.m.
alfadriver wrote: Honestly, how is that different than what Honda/Acura does? Or even most of Lexus/Toyota? (Nissan/Infinity, VW/Audi) Everybody does it. Sadly, only Ford and GM normally get bashed for it. The rest we generally ignore.

Yeah, but with Toyota/Lexus, there is the Camry and the ES, the Highlander and the RX, and the SUV's. With GM, there is the Aura, Malibu, G6, and 9-3. Trailblazer, Ranier, Envoy, 9X-7. Traverse, Enclave, Acadia, Outlook.

With the foreign brands, its Model A, and Model A with luxury.

ReverendDexter
ReverendDexter HalfDork
4/27/09 4:14 p.m.
P71 wrote: Honestly, I wish somebody would buy Holden, Opel, Saturn, and Pontiac and make a bad-ass GM competitor out of it.

I'm in!

carguy123
carguy123 Dork
4/27/09 4:19 p.m.

GMC is an issue with Dealers and distribution. They can't get rid of GMC without having to pay off a bunch of dealers. Buick is supposed to be big in China so they want to keep it. I'd vote for keeping Pontiac and axing Buick.

gamby
gamby SuperDork
4/27/09 9:13 p.m.
mtn wrote:
alfadriver wrote: Honestly, how is that different than what Honda/Acura does? Or even most of Lexus/Toyota? (Nissan/Infinity, VW/Audi) Everybody does it. Sadly, only Ford and GM normally get bashed for it. The rest we generally ignore.
Yeah, but with Toyota/Lexus, there is the Camry and the ES, the Highlander and the RX, and the SUV's. With GM, there is the Aura, Malibu, G6, and 9-3. Trailblazer, Ranier, Envoy, 9X-7. Traverse, Enclave, Acadia, Outlook. With the foreign brands, its Model A, and Model A with luxury.

Exactly.

It'll be a real shame to see Saab go. Hummer--soon isn't soon enough. Saturn--seems like they had a fighting chance if they had a couple more interesting products.

I dunno--it's still a shame that so many jobs will be lost in this "transition".

HappyAndy
HappyAndy Reader
4/27/09 11:58 p.m.
John Brown wrote: I have mentioned it before, but when the "NEW" Saturn corporation gets its freedom from GM they should offer to buy the Pontiac brand as well.

I'd like to see it happen, but I think this image is a prophecy of the independently operated Saturn and Pontiac

alfadriver
alfadriver Reader
4/28/09 6:57 a.m.
mtn wrote:
alfadriver wrote: Honestly, how is that different than what Honda/Acura does? Or even most of Lexus/Toyota? (Nissan/Infinity, VW/Audi) Everybody does it. Sadly, only Ford and GM normally get bashed for it. The rest we generally ignore.
Yeah, but with Toyota/Lexus, there is the Camry and the ES, the Highlander and the RX, and the SUV's. With GM, there is the Aura, Malibu, G6, and 9-3. Trailblazer, Ranier, Envoy, 9X-7. Traverse, Enclave, Acadia, Outlook. With the foreign brands, its Model A, and Model A with luxury.

Uh, it's still BADGE engineering.

So becuase it's luxury, it's ok. And since they LOOK so similar, whereas the Aura, Malibu, G6, and 9-3 look different, that's even worse. GM has the gall to give you more style choices, so that's worse. Really?

It's the exact same thing, but it's ok for Toyota, Honda, Nissan, VW... but not GM. You guys kill me sometimes.

Justify it how you like, but it's still the same thing. Well, not really, since GM has more STYLE choices.

Eric

John Brown
John Brown SuperDork
4/28/09 7:08 a.m.

From the press releases last week the Saturn option is viable, the Pontiac, well not so much.

http://www.tennessean.com/article/20090416/BUSINESS01/904160344/1003/NEWS01

http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=104218

http://www.autonews.com/article/20090415/ANA02/904159991/1078

Telesto said: In a statement, the Black Oak group said it would form a new Saturn Distribution Co. that would keep a vehicle design function but will not manufacture vehicles. Designers would help other automakers tailor their products to Saturn's style and customer needs, the statement said.
alfadriver
alfadriver Reader
4/28/09 7:35 a.m.

BTW, before you mention that GM is competeing with itself, that is actually keeping a customer away from other brands. So that's really a good thing.

E-

jcanracer
jcanracer New Reader
4/28/09 7:57 a.m.

I really thought that Saturn was going to survive this carpocalypse, i've never met a dissatisfied Saturn owner, and having driven one it was a solid car for the price. And even if its a small piece of the market, i was under the impression that their market share was growing with the Sky as a halo car. I even saw a Saturn Astra (?) on the road the other day and said, hmm looks nicer than my toyota matrix (blasphemy)...

93celicaGT2
93celicaGT2 Dork
4/28/09 8:20 a.m.
alfadriver wrote:
mtn wrote:
alfadriver wrote: Honestly, how is that different than what Honda/Acura does? Or even most of Lexus/Toyota? (Nissan/Infinity, VW/Audi) Everybody does it. Sadly, only Ford and GM normally get bashed for it. The rest we generally ignore.
Yeah, but with Toyota/Lexus, there is the Camry and the ES, the Highlander and the RX, and the SUV's. With GM, there is the Aura, Malibu, G6, and 9-3. Trailblazer, Ranier, Envoy, 9X-7. Traverse, Enclave, Acadia, Outlook. With the foreign brands, its Model A, and Model A with luxury.
Uh, it's still BADGE engineering. So becuase it's luxury, it's ok. And since they LOOK so similar, whereas the Aura, Malibu, G6, and 9-3 look different, that's even worse. GM has the gall to give you more style choices, so that's worse. Really? It's the exact same thing, but it's ok for Toyota, Honda, Nissan, VW... but not GM. You guys kill me sometimes. Justify it how you like, but it's still the same thing. Well, not really, since GM has more STYLE choices. Eric

But here's the thing.... really, only the Lexus ES and whatever their truck is share with Toyota.

There is no Toyota GS/IS/SC equivalent.

And drive a Camry and an ES back to back sometime. They're world's different. I realize it's the same car fundamentally, but you really can't compare the two.

Nissan is far worse, but still... Everyone seems to complain about the 350z interiors.... Well hot damn! Here's a nicer lookng 350z, with a better interior! It even looks vaguely different! You want it in sedan form? YOU GOT IT. You want in AWD? SURE!

It's not as simple as slapping another shell on the same car in the case of MOST japanese badge engineering.

With GM? More often than not, it really is.

mtn
mtn Dork
4/28/09 8:26 a.m.
alfadriver wrote: Uh, it's still BADGE engineering. So becuase it's luxury, it's ok. And since they LOOK so similar, whereas the Aura, Malibu, G6, and 9-3 look different, that's even worse. GM has the gall to give you more style choices, so that's worse. Really? It's the exact same thing, but it's ok for Toyota, Honda, Nissan, VW... but not GM. You guys kill me sometimes. Justify it how you like, but it's still the same thing. Well, not really, since GM has more STYLE choices. Eric

I know its still badge engineering. But I think that GM has overdone it. That, and Toyota has 9.5 models that stand alone (matrix... does that count as a corolla wagon? and should we count it as a Vibe?), not counting pickups, and Lexus has 4 models that stand alone out of a lineup of 8.

Not counting pickups, Chevrolet has 2 that are stand alone models, 3 if you count the camaro. Saturn has ONE. Pontiac has 1.5 (again with the vibe/matrix). Buick has ONE (although they only have 3 models, right?) Cadillac is much better; they have what is pretty clearly their own identity IMO.

We test drove an Aura, a Malibu, and a 9-3. I honestly couldn't tell you which one was which for the first two. The Saab was a lot harder to tell that it was the same thing.

Maybe I'm an idiot, but it seems kinda stupid to have so many flavors of vanilla.

mtn
mtn Dork
4/28/09 8:28 a.m.
93celicaGT2 wrote: There is no Toyota GS/IS/SC equivalent.

You forgot LS

skruffy
skruffy Dork
4/28/09 8:31 a.m.

The toyota version of the lexus IS is called the altezza, the SC was also known as the soarer, and the GS is something equally odd. Sure, none of these cars were sold in the US but they do exist.

The best recent example of blatant GM badge engineering is the Cobalt/G5. If you can name me more than 3 or 4 superficial differences I'd be surprised.

John Brown
John Brown SuperDork
4/28/09 8:37 a.m.

1: grille insert

2: tail lamps

3: rear bumper

4: trunk lid

5: hubcaps

6: wheels

7: interior

I got seven without trying

pinchvalve
pinchvalve SuperDork
4/28/09 9:24 a.m.

I look at Honda and they have a Fit, Insight, S2000, Clarity and Odyssey...none of which translate to Acura. The Civic and Accord are quite different from their Acura versions, I can't even tell you which platform becomes which car or if they even do. And Acura has three different sedans, so at least one is probably unique. The RDX from Acura, the CR-V, Ridgeline and Element from Honda are all unique. Only the MDX and Pilot seem even remotely related. So I am not sure you can lump Honda in with the Badge Engineering crowd.

That said, there is some historical bias involved in bashing GM. Years ago there was a Chevy, Pontiac, Buick and Olds version of every sedan they made. That is no longer the case; Olds is dead, Buick and Saturn don't have a version of the Cobalt, and the G5 will be dead soon when Pontiac dies. I am guilty for remembering GMs sins of the 80's and 90's but they are working on it.

1 2 3

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
sJ6EAPaYp4BXlRucbtUu27pRQ0ptoaM8xGhWAYt9chRuOCS5txPgmjdzcS7BW0sn