SV reX said:In reply to Curtis73 (Forum Supporter) :
I'm not saying they did a bad job. I'm saying they did a bad job communicating and managing the customer's expectations.
That's still their job.
Agreed. I used to be so bluntly honest with customers, and it ended up being an under-promise, over-deliver scenario. I think too many shops undercut to get people in the door and then they look like upselling crooks when they call back with "it's actually going to cost..."
I used to give customers multiple scenarios
- we diagnosed a bad compressor. If that's the only problem it will be $xxx
- we can do a full leak test with dye to make sure it's just a bad compressor, and that costs an additional $yyy
- or you can do the whole kit and caboodle for $zzz (which is usually less than X + Y combined)
Some choose the step-by-step hoping that they'll get lucky, but I also explained to customers - even showing them the book hours - about how labor is far less if you do additional things while you're in there. If they had explained to your friend that the 1.2 hours (or whatever) for evac and recharge would be charged again for the condenser replacement on top of the 0.7 for the replacement labor, he may have chosen to just go ahead and spend the money.
Again, it would have been your friend's choice, but at least it should have been explained to them instead of randomly saying, "this will fix it."
Long story short, I basically told customers:
- We can start with $500 for a compressor and see if that does it
- Or we can do a full system for $1000
- Or we can do $500 for a compressor knowing that it might be $2000 until we keep re-doing it in pieces,
They almost always choose the $1000 option. That gives us the room to properly diagnose and fix it all, and that ALWAYS brings customers back.