1 2
Stanger2000
Stanger2000 New Reader
1/18/18 12:00 p.m.
FIYAPOWA said:

In reply to Stanger2000 :

It is "under construction" at the moment - I have a rendering coming in the next couple weeks, will post.

It's currently a 6 cylinder automatic car, getting a 302 2-barrel (on purpose) and a 4-speed (Toploader), again, on purpose.  Sticking with stock front suspension geometry, stock leaf rear on the Ford 8" axle.  If I can get the weight to around 3100 lbs I'll be happy, since I'm not doing any massive weight-shedding in the build process.  End goal is a vintage NASCAR vibe.

Sounds like a nice project on your hands.  Pretty sure that would be the 3.3 I-6 in it and most likely a C3 or C4? auto, borrowed from the Maverick/Comet which at the time probably made somewhere under 100hp surprise.  

dropstep
dropstep SuperDork
1/18/18 12:07 p.m.
Stanger2000 said:
FIYAPOWA said:

In reply to Stanger2000 :

It is "under construction" at the moment - I have a rendering coming in the next couple weeks, will post.

It's currently a 6 cylinder automatic car, getting a 302 2-barrel (on purpose) and a 4-speed (Toploader), again, on purpose.  Sticking with stock front suspension geometry, stock leaf rear on the Ford 8" axle.  If I can get the weight to around 3100 lbs I'll be happy, since I'm not doing any massive weight-shedding in the build process.  End goal is a vintage NASCAR vibe.

Sounds like a nice project on your hands.  Pretty sure that would be the 3.3 I-6 in it and most likely a C3 or C4? auto, borrowed from the Maverick/Comet which at the time probably made somewhere under 100hp surprise.  

If its the 200(3.3l) it would be rocking 88hp. Grenada's were available with the 250 though. Radial TA's are garbage for traction in any condition.

1 2

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
zRry1jXauPwWeMN7PI2i67sXuO6Pw4F965laP4B6ydNTLj9kydDpvS4jpToSpowq