Trying to figure out what to do in lieu of correct-size tires for the little Kawasaki Ninja 250R track day/kart track bike.
Wheels are 17" diameter , 2.75" wide front, 3.5" wide rear.
Stock tires are 100/70 front, 130/70 rear. Nobody makes a 130-width track day tire, nor in fact a track day rear tire narrower than 140.
There are two camps of local riders on these:
- Folks on the full size track in the Ninja 250 Cup, running Bridgestone slicks in 120/600-17 at both ends (Bridgestone does F and R construction in that size)
- Folks at the kart track running 120/70-17 front, 140/70-17 rear
I don't want to deal with tire warmers and so the Real Slicks aren't for me. Trying to run 120 at both ends in a DOT Track Day tire (e.g. Pirelli Diablo Rosso Corsa or Bridgestone Battlax RS10) means running a front-construction tire on the rear.
The most trusted person I could ask locally didn't want to make a specific recommendation, but felt that 140 was mostly too wide for a 3.5" wheel. Note that Pirelli won't recommend anything to fit the Kawasaki, and Bridgestone says the ideal fit for the RS10 is 3" front, 4" rear, but the recommended range includes 2.75" front and 3.5" rear, though that's not true of the tire one notch less aggressive: their Hypersport S2 wants a minimum 3" front, 4" rear.
I'm a little confused that going up 20% in front tire width appears to be dandy, while going up 8% rear is too much tire, though I don't have enough command of normal relative wheel and tire widths to know whether 2.75" is wider relative to the 100 front than the 3.5" is relative to the 130 rear.
My tentative plan is to go RS10s 110/70 front 140/70 rear, on the grounds that that's all within Bridgestone's recommendations for rim widths, and is "one step" up both front and rear. I'd almost be tempted to stick to a 100 front, but given that both the wide-rear and skinny-rear groups have settled on a 120 front, going up one step feels safer. The case could be made for running a 120 front, too... But then the RS10 isn't available in 100, and the 110 front and 140 rear are both from their H-series and the 120 front is from the W series as is the rest of the larger rears. Probably a carcass construction mismatch?
Actually, that's a great spot to stop babbling about what I've gleaned and guessed and ask whether anybody has any opinions or related facts.