KyAllroad wrote: Alfa, I think it has to do with the scale of the event and the pure hatred expressed by an "other" that we as a nation can rally around. A text and drive death sucks for sure but it's simple negligence and just a few lives affected (no matter how badly). 9-11 told us, as a society, that there are people out there motivated enough to commit mass murder on a monumental scale on the basis of religion and culture.
Couple of things, though.
At what scale do we remember like this? Was Sandy Hook large enough? That was against innocent kids. Or will the recent attack Orlando be large enough? How many does it take that we have anniversary events where the news reminds us in great details what happened?
Second- how long is long enough? We've fought a war, we've killed the leader, and really gutted the actual group that did this. Last time a similar attack happened was in 1941, and I kinda doubt we were reminding ourselves like this in 1956. Sure, there are movies and what not, and they keep coming back. But not the all day media event on so many channels. We've not forgotten Peal Harbor, either.
Is it really good for us to remind us of the rage? Does hating "them" make us better? And by "them"- who are they and why do they hate us so much? I can't see us ever killing all of them, so that seems pretty pointless. It's not as if radical Muslims are the only ones who have committed mass murder on a monumental scale just due to religion and culture- heck, they have millions of people to go to catch up with others.
Instead of rage, maybe we should be reminded that it's virtually impossible to fight terrorism with violence, but it's useful to fight the ideas behind the reasons. Probably save a lot of lives that way.
And never forget the people willing to lay down their lives for us, or the loved ones that we lost. And always remember the loved ones we have with us.