Isn't she supposed to beautifying Canada by now?
sesto elemento wrote:
In reply to yupididit:
I feel a bit bad for the families. Their every move gets scrutinized because of one person's career choice.
We can pretend we're above it, but biological evolution makes us have a chemical reaction to symmetry and a hundred other features of the human body that make us happy when we see people that would make good mates. It improves the breed by driving us to procreate with the person (or people) that is (are) most likely to help us produce healthy, successful offspring. That doesn't mean for a second that there aren't other very important (even crucial to the success of our kind) attributes that one can posess.
I just enjoy the chemical reactions that I have when I see someone who would be likely to help me produce good offspring.
And you do too.
sesto elemento wrote:carguy123 wrote: People on TV need to look a certain way. People on radio need to sound a certain way. It's inherent in the medium. If you're talking about all the pics of the Trumps today, they seem to have a certain sense of style or some very good dressers. It doesn't hurt to be the first family and have designers doing everything for you.There wasn't a whole lot of meaningful content during the inauguration to keep me entertained. Call me crazy but I was glad to be looking at this woman rather than this one:
FTFY
In reply to yupididit:
Obama is somebody I think I'd enjoy sitting down and having a beer with. He seems to like a good stout, as do I.
I could see going for a bike ride with GW. While I didn't always agree with him, but I never thought ill of him.
Clinton. No real desire to meet him. Her? Maybe.
this is the most pathetic E36 M3 ever posted on this board.
some of you deserve a swift kick to the junk. berkeleying knuckle draggers
This topic is locked. No further posts are being accepted.