Conquest351 wrote: It's hard when there's 30 pix of bewbs in a row.
I see what you did there. 
Conquest351 wrote: It's hard when there's 30 pix of bewbs in a row.
I see what you did there.
The good folks in NYC's city council also have a problem with this:
“They have a pattern of offending people in order to make a profit,” City Councilman Peter Vallone Jr. (D-Astoria) said Thursday. “It is disrespectful, especially for a company that puts out a 23-ounce can of diabetes. It’s a product we should all stay away from.”
The signs that proclaim “I love big cans,” feature a picture of the tall drink. But “cans” is also slang for breasts, or, in its singular form, to a person’s behind.
The company claims it never intended to convey a sexual message, but Vallone called that “laughable.” Jackie Harrigan, a spokeswoman for Arizona, said the nationwide campaign, which has been running for about one year, is based solely on the popularity of its product.
In reply to Wally:
berkeley NYC to death.
Dang. I gotta work on my reverse psychology. I'll post this.
That guy is a total boob.
Wally wrote: “They have a pattern of offending people in order to make a profit,” City Councilman Peter Vallone Jr. (D-Astoria) said Thursday. “It is disrespectful, especially for a company that puts out a 23-ounce can of diabetes. It’s a product we should all stay away from.”
Whoa! Seriously? This guy is a loon.
RealMiniDriver wrote:Conquest351 wrote: It's hard when there's 30 pix of bewbs in a row.I see what you did there.
Glad someone did...
“They have a pattern of offending people in order to make a profit,” City Councilman Peter Vallone Jr. (D-Astoria) said Thursday. “It is disrespectful, especially for a company that puts out a 23-ounce can of diabetes. It’s a product we should all stay away from.”
People like this go on my "ignore because of stupid" list and stay there.
Sorry, back to the normal griping. 
Honestly, if it rained $100 bills and Oreos, somebody would complain about it.
1988RedT2 wrote: Honestly, if it rained $100 bills and Oreos, somebody would complain about it.
Oreos make you fat you know . . .
kazoospec wrote:1988RedT2 wrote: Honestly, if it rained $100 bills and Oreos, somebody would complain about it.Oreos make you fat you know . . .
And most fast food joints won't take $100s.....
ultraclyde wrote:kazoospec wrote:And most fast food joints won't take $100s.....1988RedT2 wrote: Honestly, if it rained $100 bills and Oreos, somebody would complain about it.Oreos make you fat you know . . .
Who the berkeley uses cash these days anyways?
In reply to 92CelicaHalfTrac:
I do.
Nice rack. 
Biting my tongue 
iadr wrote: Well I like boobs, cash, AND (unlike quite a few of you)NYC's bylaw. Maybe it comes from living in Canada where we have to pay $150,000 and up hundreds of time a day, because some dumb berkeley refuses to take care of themselves.
Yes, the essence of free society, "let's start social programs... Wait, these cost money... I know, instead on trimming our ill-advised social programs, let's infringe on personal freedom..."
I don't see why there is such a fuss. Granted when I look at this thread I make sure my 7 year old daughter is not right be side me. Plus did any one make such a big fuss when those picture of men where on that thread, I don't know about you but if I don't want to look at some thing I don't look at it. Last I check the pictures where in good taste as well, none of them look obscene.
Better?
Sabrina s 
In reply to fasted58 and Karl:
What you guys did there, I saw it.
Volksrodden wrote: Plus did any one make such a big fuss when those picture of men where on that thread.
The Tom of Finland pictures were a protest of all the boob pics.
It's ok to hate moobs. It is not ok to hate boobs.
Wally wrote:
I regret that I have never owned a car with low enough mileage to properly commemorate this milestone.
You'll need to log in to post.
