Will wrote:The_Jed wrote:I'm not certain, but based on the inner pair of headlights, I think this is a 58, not a 57.
well it WAS originally posted on pager 1958 ......
If only John Diefenbaker hadn't happened along, we would had this instead of those damn Bomarc missles that the US had to take back and give us a replica, since they were leaking radioactivity into our park.
Canada might have still had a hell of an aerospace industry, if this went into production.
Javelin wrote:
Flight Service wrote: Wrong thread guys, we have been down this road.
Geez, next you'll be whining about inappropriate subjects in the jokes thread.
oldsaw wrote:Flight Service wrote: Wrong thread guys, we have been down this road.Geez, next you'll be whining about inappropriate subjects in the jokes thread.
Watch the language this is a family portion of the thread...
wbjones wrote:Will wrote:well it WAS originally posted on pager 1958 ......The_Jed wrote:I'm not certain, but based on the inner pair of headlights, I think this is a 58, not a 57.
No.
You'll need to log in to post.