G_Body_Man wrote: In reply to captdownshift: Yeah. Here's hoping Stef is feeling more or less back to normal soon. Did you read the article about what happened to her after the Nash incident?
Details for those of us without social media?
G_Body_Man wrote: In reply to captdownshift: Yeah. Here's hoping Stef is feeling more or less back to normal soon. Did you read the article about what happened to her after the Nash incident?
Details for those of us without social media?
You know with Stef's reporting on motoraports including a nice mix of amateur and even crapcan coverage (and participation) and professional series coverage that focuses on series that that hardcore gearhead appreciates, devoting as much attention to IMSA and WEC as she does to open wheel and things going counter clockwise, maybe if jalopnik vaporizes a home near and dear to our hearts could be found.
Will wrote: Maybe if a billionaire was bankrolling a lawsuit against an orphanage or something I might be upset. But bankrolling a lawsuit against a sleazeball clickbait content aggregator company (allegedly) worth over $100 million? Nope, don't have any berkeleys to give.
Just so happens I was about to link to this article on precisely why you should give a berkeley:
http://www.wired.com/2016/06/gawkers-bankruptcy-free-press-dies-one-vc-time/
The end result of this could be even more vapid gossip rags instead of less, as "sudden financial ruin" is added to the risks of doing real investigative journalism (if it embarrasses or inconveniences anyone with money).
You'll need to log in to post.