ignorant
ignorant SuperDork
3/1/10 6:49 a.m.

http://thenextweb.com/shareables/2010/02/27/newsweek-1995-buy-books-newspapers-straight-intenet-uh/

idiot said: The Internet? Bah! Hype alert: Why cyberspace isn’t, and will never be, nirvana After two decades online, I’m perplexed. It’s not that I haven’t had a gas of a good time on the Internet. I’ve met great people and even caught a hacker or two. But today, I’m uneasy about this most trendy and oversold community. Visionaries see a future of telecommuting workers, interactive libraries and multimedia classrooms. They speak of electronic town meetings and virtual communities. Commerce and business will shift from offices and malls to networks and modems. And the freedom of digital networks will make government more democratic.Baloney. Do our computer pundits lack all common sense? The truth in no online database will replace your daily newspaper, no CD-ROM can take the place of a competent teacher and no computer network will change the way government works. Consider today’s online world. The Usenet, a worldwide bulletin board, allows anyone to post messages across the nation. Your word gets out, leapfrogging editors and publishers. Every voice can be heard cheaply and instantly. The result? Every voice is heard. The cacophany more closely resembles citizens band radio, complete with handles, harrasment, and anonymous threats. When most everyone shouts, few listen. How about electronic publishing? Try reading a book on disc. At best, it’s an unpleasant chore: the myopic glow of a clunky computer replaces the friendly pages of a book. And you can’t tote that laptop to the beach. Yet Nicholas Negroponte, director of the MIT Media Lab, predicts that we’ll soon buy books and newspapers straight over the Intenet. Uh, sure. What the Internet hucksters won’t tell you is tht the Internet is one big ocean of unedited data, without any pretense of completeness. Lacking editors, reviewers or critics, the Internet has become a wasteland of unfiltered data. You don’t know what to ignore and what’s worth reading. Logged onto the World Wide Web, I hunt for the date of the Battle of Trafalgar. Hundreds of files show up, and it takes 15 minutes to unravel them–one’s a biography written by an eighth grader, the second is a computer game that doesn’t work and the third is an image of a London monument. None answers my question, and my search is periodically interrupted by messages like, “Too many connectios, try again later.” Won’t the Internet be useful in governing? Internet addicts clamor for government reports. But when Andy Spano ran for county executive in Westchester County, N.Y., he put every press release and position paper onto a bulletin board. In that affluent county, with plenty of computer companies, how many voters logged in? Fewer than 30. Not a good omen. Point and click:Then there are those pushing computers into schools. We’re told that multimedia will make schoolwork easy and fun. Students will happily learn from animated characters while taught by expertly tailored software.Who needs teachers when you’ve got computer-aided education? Bah. These expensive toys are difficult to use in classrooms and require extensive teacher training. Sure, kids love videogames–but think of your own experience: can you recall even one educational filmstrip of decades past? I’ll bet you remember the two or three great teachers who made a difference in your life. Then there’s cyberbusiness. We’re promised instant catalog shopping–just point and click for great deals. We’ll order airline tickets over the network, make restaurant reservations and negotiate sales contracts. Stores will become obselete. So how come my local mall does more business in an afternoon than the entire Internet handles in a month? Even if there were a trustworthy way to send money over the Internet–which there isn’t–the network is missing a most essential ingredient of capitalism: salespeople. What’s missing from this electronic wonderland? Human contact. Discount the fawning techno-burble about virtual communities. Computers and networks isolate us from one another. A network chat line is a limp substitute for meeting friends over coffee. No interactive multimedia display comes close to the excitement of a live concert. And who’d prefer cybersex to the real thing? While the Internet beckons brightly, seductively flashing an icon of knowledge-as-power, this nonplace lures us to surrender our time on earth. A poor substitute it is, this virtual reality where frustration is legion and where–in the holy names of Education and Progress–important aspects of human interactions are relentlessly devalued.

whoops!

Per Schroeder
Per Schroeder Technical Editor/Advertising Director
3/1/10 7:17 a.m.

Does it make me a Luddite if I believe that the original premise of the article is still relevant and rings true?

zomby woof
zomby woof HalfDork
3/1/10 7:28 a.m.

Pretty much.

alfadriver
alfadriver Dork
3/1/10 8:01 a.m.
Per Schroeder wrote: Does it make me a Luddite if I believe that the original premise of the article is still relevant and rings true?

+1

Jensenman
Jensenman SuperDork
3/1/10 8:25 a.m.

Then put me in the Luddite corner too. Give me a real newspaper or a book any time. Yeah, I am an old fart.

While teh int3erweb has its uses and e-commerce can be a good thing, it can never beat getting out to see people. I also see a lot of people who think online role playing games (like racing games ) can somehow be as 'real' as the real thing. So we seem to be raising an entire generation who are hung up on virtual rather than real sports.

John Brown
John Brown SuperDork
3/1/10 8:30 a.m.

Luddite +1

cwh
cwh SuperDork
3/1/10 9:24 a.m.

My business runs on VOIP phones and e-mail. Lot's of personal contact via phone, but it sure is nice to get some face time. Unfortunately, for me, that's quite expensive. Without the computer, we would not have a business.

JeepinMatt
JeepinMatt HalfDork
3/1/10 1:29 p.m.

Could you see government being run online? Spam would drown out anything anyone said. Most of what anyone said would be conspiracy theories and irrelevant crap, if you could read ALL CAPS and typos that would make a kindergartener blush. Then once something meaningful gets through, it would crash.

And a CD Rom isn't a replacement for a teacher. It might help you, but it's not the same. But a good bit of that article was wrong. Particularly the bit about point-and-click online commerce. I'm still skeptical about other bits though. "Futurists" always over-estimate what we're gonna have and when it's gonna happen.

alfadriver
alfadriver Dork
3/1/10 3:13 p.m.
John Brown wrote: Luddite +1

Something for your facebook page?

mad_machine
mad_machine SuperDork
3/1/10 3:29 p.m.

put me in the luddite corner too

Wally
Wally SuperDork
3/1/10 3:30 p.m.

I would be alot madder if my puppy pooped on my computer

ignorant
ignorant SuperDork
3/1/10 5:27 p.m.
Per Schroeder wrote: Does it make me a Luddite if I believe that the original premise of the article is still relevant and rings true?

But Its not being proved out in the market today.

I bought textbooks for my online degree in PDF format. I also got a top ranked mba online that allowed me to get a pretty awesome job in the basement of the economic recepression...

Jerry From LA
Jerry From LA HalfDork
3/1/10 5:56 p.m.

Read E.M. Forster's The Machine Stops. Yes, that E.M. Forster. He wrote a futuristic short story where almost everything in it is either true today or can be seen on the horizon. Read it and be amazed that he wrote it in 1909. He completely predicted the internet and The Information Age.

If anybody's interested, PM me and I'll send you a copy.

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
24l2G6pnZa9pDlhPrinq564BfLuIstPo32XtYpnzJwyoBirqo7wWamwULqDbGiU7