xfactoraeg
xfactoraeg New Reader
1/12/11 3:26 p.m.

http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f11/96-jeep-cherokee-need-opinions-1149721/

Giant Purple Snorklewacker
Giant Purple Snorklewacker SuperDork
1/12/11 3:28 p.m.

Duke
Duke SuperDork
1/12/11 3:29 p.m.

We found it full of repoast.

914Driver
914Driver SuperDork
1/12/11 3:32 p.m.

Please don't shoot the dog.

Please spell check.

aircooled
aircooled SuperDork
1/12/11 4:25 p.m.

Well in defense of the "repoaster", unless you religiously (praise GRM) read the forums and go through all the threads it can be very difficult to tell what was posted based on the thread titles.

fast_eddie_72
fast_eddie_72 HalfDork
1/12/11 4:27 p.m.

You get one poast, plus another! Poast plus!

Marty!
Marty! Dork
1/12/11 7:39 p.m.

Poast?

Holy crap it's actually a word! Well sort of......

Looks like Duke wins.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Poast

T.J.
T.J. SuperDork
1/12/11 7:57 p.m.

This is getting to Ken Block proportions.

I agree a thread titled EPIC thread! or full of funny or whatever the other one was called do not jump out at you and let you know that somewhere on the internet is a grump dude with a chip on his shoulder hiding behind a veil of anonymity tossing insults at strangers.

Do you think the dudes at DARPA had any idea that's what their creation would lead to?

ultraclyde
ultraclyde Reader
1/13/11 10:39 a.m.
Marty! wrote: Poast? Holy crap it's actually a word! Well sort of...... Looks like Duke wins. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Poast

Marty, you may call me oldfashioned but I refuse to accept definitions written by "gayskunk" and "snoopdoggiedoo." I prefer the definitions written by "Merriam Webster" or "Oxford."

Woody
Woody SuperDork
1/13/11 2:05 p.m.

Ruger GP100.

Giant Purple Snorklewacker wrote:
chuckles
chuckles Reader
1/13/11 4:15 p.m.

Looks like a Smith to me.

TRoglodyte
TRoglodyte Reader
1/13/11 4:29 p.m.
Giant Purple Snorklewacker wrote:

Any old dogs remember this magazine cover?

DoctorBlade
DoctorBlade HalfDork
1/13/11 4:33 p.m.

Ugh. I also recall lots of people found it funny, too. At least I knew who to avoid in the future.

TRoglodyte
TRoglodyte Reader
1/13/11 4:42 p.m.

Marketing ploy,I bought the magazine.

JohnGalt
JohnGalt Reader
1/13/11 5:02 p.m.
Woody wrote: Ruger GP100.
Giant Purple Snorklewacker wrote:

I have one in my hand and can confirm it is not a GP100

Keith
Keith SuperDork
1/13/11 5:18 p.m.

Why are you surfing the internet with a gun in your hand? This cannot end well.

chuckles
chuckles Reader
1/14/11 7:28 a.m.

"...magazine cover." National Lampoon, early '70's. I guess it made an impression on me and the Snorkelwacker.

TRoglodyte
TRoglodyte Reader
1/14/11 7:31 a.m.
chuckles wrote: "...magazine cover." National Lampoon, early '70's. I guess it made an impression on me and the Snorkelwacker.

Winner, caption said Buy this magazine or we'll shoot this dog, bonus points if you can name the editor.

chuckles
chuckles Reader
1/14/11 7:33 a.m.

Oh, gee...P. J. O'Rourke? Christopher Guest? I dunno.

Duke
Duke SuperDork
1/14/11 7:54 a.m.

Yeah, that's PJ's handiwork. I wouldn't be surprised if it's PJ's hand and piece, too.

Giant Purple Snorklewacker
Giant Purple Snorklewacker SuperDork
1/14/11 8:02 a.m.
Duke wrote: Yeah, that's PJ's handiwork. I wouldn't be surprised if it's PJ's hand and piece, too.

You are correct sir. I don't have a cookie to give you. Sorry.

On PJ: He is funny as hell as a writer but I tuned in to Bill Mahr's show to see him once or twice and he is HORRIBLE in person. Methinks he needs time to think before opening the yapper... much better author than actor.

xfactoraeg
xfactoraeg New Reader
1/14/11 11:28 a.m.

In reply to Duke:

Ahhh, apologies for the repost and committing the same faux pas of not adequately/appropriately titling and summarizing. Got trigger happy, I suppose.

chuckles
chuckles Reader
1/14/11 11:42 a.m.
xfactoraeg wrote: In reply to Duke: Got trigger happy, I suppose.

Well done.

Duke
Duke SuperDork
1/14/11 8:53 p.m.
xfactoraeg wrote: In reply to Duke: Ahhh, apologies for the repost and committing the same faux pas of not adequately/appropriately titling and summarizing. Got trigger happy, I suppose.

It's not like the original thread was particularly obvious from ITS title... hence the wink

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
I2sPJBe2scyb3a3OxypLSjcTtXYK9uQkaiUH7z8MOe1eH0nIyVex7hcvBh2rgmVK