1 2
Rusted_Busted_Spit
Rusted_Busted_Spit Dork
4/21/11 8:54 a.m.

Laser sparks revolution in internal combustion engines

" WASHINGTON, April 20 — For more than 150 years, spark plugs have powered internal combustion engines. Automakers are now one step closer to being able to replace this long-standing technology with laser igniters, which will enable cleaner, more efficient, and more economical vehicles.

In the past, lasers strong enough to ignite an engine’s air-fuel mixtures were too large to fit under an automobile’s hood. At this year’s Conference on Lasers and Electro Optics (CLEO: 2011), to be held in Baltimore May 1 – 6, researchers from Japan will describe the first multibeam laser system small enough to screw into an engine’s cylinder head.

Equally significant, the new laser system is made from ceramics, and could be produced inexpensively in large volumes, according to one of the presentation’s authors, Takunori Taira of Japan’s National Institutes of Natural Sciences.

According to Taira, conventional spark plugs pose a barrier to improving fuel economy and reducing emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx), a key component of smog.

Spark plugs work by sending small, high-voltage electrical sparks across a gap between two metal electrodes. The spark ignites the air-fuel mixture in the engine’s cylinder — producing a controlled explosion that forces the piston down to the bottom of the cylinder, generating the horsepower needed to move the vehicle.

Engines make NOx as a byproduct of combustion. If engines ran leaner — burnt more air and less fuel — they would produce significantly smaller NOx emissions.

Spark plugs can ignite leaner fuel mixtures, but only by increasing spark energy. Unfortunately, these high voltages erode spark plug electrodes so fast, the solution is not economical. By contrast, lasers, which ignite the air-fuel mixture with concentrated optical energy, have no electrodes and are not affected.

Lasers also improve efficiency. Conventional spark plugs sit on top of the cylinder and only ignite the air-fuel mixture close to them. The relatively cold metal of nearby electrodes and cylinder walls absorbs heat from the explosion, quenching the flame front just as it starts to expand.

Lasers, Taira explains, can focus their beams directly into the center of the mixture. Without quenching, the flame front expands more symmetrically and up to three times faster than those produced by spark plugs.

Equally important, he says, lasers inject their energy within nanoseconds, compared with milliseconds for spark plugs. “Timing — quick combustion — is very important. The more precise the timing, the more efficient the combustion and the better the fuel economy,” he says.

Lasers promise less pollution and greater fuel efficiency, but making small, powerful lasers has, until now, proven hard. To ignite combustion, a laser must focus light to approximately 100 gigawatts per square centimeter with short pulses of more than 10 millijoules each.

“In the past, lasers that could meet those requirements were limited to basic research because they were big, inefficient, and unstable,” Taira says. Nor could they be located away from the engine, because their powerful beams would destroy any optical fibers that delivered light to the cylinders.

Taira’s research team overcame this problem by making composite lasers from ceramic powders. The team heats the powders to fuse them into optically transparent solids and embeds metal ions in them to tune their properties.

Ceramics are easier to tune optically than conventional crystals. They are also much stronger, more durable, and thermally conductive, so they can dissipate the heat from an engine without breaking down.

Taira’s team built its laser from two yttrium-aluminum-gallium (YAG) segments, one doped with neodymium, the other with chromium. They bonded the two sections together to form a powerful laser only 9 millimeters in diameter and 11 millimeters long (a bit less than half an inch).

The composite generates two laser beams that can ignite fuel in two separate locations at the same time. This would produce a flame wall that grows faster and more uniformly than one lit by a single laser.

The laser is not strong enough to light the leanest fuel mixtures with a single pulse. By using several 800-picosecond-long pulses, however, they can inject enough energy to ignite the mixture completely.

A commercial automotive engine will require 60 Hz (or pulse trains per second), Taira says. He has already tested the new dual-beam laser at 100 Hz. The team is also at work on a three-beam laser that will enable even faster and more uniform combustion.

The laser-ignition system, although highly promising, is not yet being installed into actual automobiles made in a factory. Taira’s team is, however, working with a large spark-plug company and with DENSO Corporation, a member of the Toyota Group.

This work is supported by the Japan Science and Technical Agency (JST). "

Interesting.

SyntheticBlinkerFluid
SyntheticBlinkerFluid Reader
4/21/11 9:01 a.m.

Oh good so instead of $20 for a set of plugs it will be $1000.

ReverendDexter
ReverendDexter SuperDork
4/21/11 9:13 a.m.
SyntheticBlinkerFluid wrote: Oh good so instead of $20 for a set of plugs it will be $1000.

Yeah, but they're laser plugs!

DILYSI Dave
DILYSI Dave SuperDork
4/21/11 9:16 a.m.

I do recall Smoky Yunick stating that the spark plug was what would be the wall in ICE development. Said that a flame started by a flame propogates MUCH better than one started by a spark.

DukeOfUndersteer
DukeOfUndersteer SuperDork
4/21/11 9:17 a.m.

...Future Auto Zone Parts Counter Employee...

tuna55
tuna55 Dork
4/21/11 9:21 a.m.

Some issues, although I am sure they can be ironed out:

Aren't lasers energy pigs?

Is the statement about accurate timing really believable? Are OEMs really sitting around going "Man, if only we could control the variability of these spark plug ignition events"? I kinda doubt it.

bluej
bluej Dork
4/21/11 9:23 a.m.

hmm,

lasers + direct injection + boost at 11 = HERE WE GO!

carguy123
carguy123 SuperDork
4/21/11 9:24 a.m.

WOW! I could get a set of ten and mount them on each finger and then make me up a cool superhero suit and go around cutting up bad guys!

I could cut my way thru steel like butter. I'd be like Wolverine only better!!!

ReverendDexter
ReverendDexter SuperDork
4/21/11 9:35 a.m.

I think the key thing here is that it'll allow engineers to control where the flame starts inside the combustion chamber. Hemis will actually make sense when the flame can start at the BOTTOM of the chamber and burn upward.

I can imagine some cool tech coming out of this:

Variable focusing ignition lasers could make for some awesome engines - ignite closer to the top for longer burns under lower rpm, ignite near the piston so the flame burns faster under higher rpm.

Or muli-focus lasers that could simultaneously ignite multiple points inside the chamber simultaneously.

Or targetable lasering systems that do something like MSD, but target the specific pockets of unburnt fuel on later firings of the same ignition stroke.

ditchdigger
ditchdigger HalfDork
4/21/11 9:41 a.m.
tuna55 wrote: Are OEMs really sitting around going "Man, if only we could control the variability of these spark plug ignition events"? I kinda doubt it.

I am betting the guys behind this are wearing these

keethrax
keethrax Reader
4/21/11 9:56 a.m.
SyntheticBlinkerFluid wrote: Oh good so instead of $20 for a set of plugs it will be $1000.

Plugs are only the last step in the ignition system, not the whole system.

fast_eddie_72
fast_eddie_72 Dork
4/21/11 9:56 a.m.
tuna55 wrote: Is the statement about accurate timing really believable? Are OEMs really sitting around going "Man, if only we could control the variability of these spark plug ignition events"? I kinda doubt it.

Just reading the article, I don't think it's the timing of the spark plug that is the issue. I think it's the speed of the flame and the variability of the quench. The lazers sound like they would provide a quicker, more predictable burn.

Scott Lear
Scott Lear Production Editor
4/21/11 10:16 a.m.

Who do you think will jump on this first? Lexus (the DENSO tie-in makes this likely)? Acura? BMW?

If it's worth a few MPG and a cleaner engine, one of the high-end manufacturers will find a way to get it on a car and brag about it.

nderwater
nderwater HalfDork
4/21/11 10:36 a.m.

forget the lasers, can't we just jump straight to warp drive?

Rusted_Busted_Spit
Rusted_Busted_Spit Dork
4/21/11 10:41 a.m.

I would guess Lexus but then again it seems like Mercedes likes to get new tech into the S class before anyone else.

T.J.
T.J. SuperDork
4/21/11 10:45 a.m.

Mercedes and Lexus are neck and neck in my book. Both will come out in the same model year. It will add $5,000 to the MSRP of the car, produce slightly better performance and emissions. The next year Hyundai will put it on the Gensis while only charging $250 more.

16vCorey
16vCorey SuperDork
4/21/11 10:50 a.m.

Now if they'd just actuate valves with electronic actuators instead of camshafts we'd have infinitely variable valve timing and no parasitic drag of (sometimes multiple) camshafts. It seems like it would be easy enough to keep them in time with a crank sensor. Just have a fail safe that would immediately close the valves if there was a problem and you wouldn't have to worry about interference engine issues.

92CelicaHalfTrac
92CelicaHalfTrac SuperDork
4/21/11 10:53 a.m.
16vCorey wrote: Now if they'd just actuate valves with electronic actuators instead of camshafts we'd have infinitely variable valve timing and no parasitic drag of (sometimes multiple) camshafts. It seems like it would be easy enough to keep them in time with a crank sensor. Just have a fail safe that would immediately close the valves if there was a problem and you wouldn't have to worry about interference engine issues.

I'm ashamed to admit that this Toyota fanboi doesn't know this for sure, but i thought Toyota VVTL-i already did that to an extent?

SyntheticBlinkerFluid
SyntheticBlinkerFluid Reader
4/21/11 11:08 a.m.
keethrax wrote:
SyntheticBlinkerFluid wrote: Oh good so instead of $20 for a set of plugs it will be $1000.
Plugs are only the last step in the ignition system, not the whole system.

Oh, I don't even want to think how much the other ignition parts are going to be.

Donebrokeit
Donebrokeit Reader
4/21/11 11:22 a.m.

Baltimore you say....

keethrax
keethrax Reader
4/21/11 11:22 a.m.
SyntheticBlinkerFluid wrote:
keethrax wrote:
SyntheticBlinkerFluid wrote: Oh good so instead of $20 for a set of plugs it will be $1000.
Plugs are only the last step in the ignition system, not the whole system.
Oh, I don't even want to think how much the other ignition parts are going to be.

Cheaper than a single coil + a distributor? Heck no. But that's not what you'd be competing with.

Cheaper than coil on plug? Probably not, but I bet it wouldn't take much to at least be close enough if there are real gains to be had.

Lasers are getting cheap fast and have been for a while. It's not hard to imagine a laser based system being at least in the same ballpark as a current system within a very short timeframe, assuming their are actual gains to be had that make the development worthwhile.

tuna55
tuna55 Dork
4/21/11 11:23 a.m.

In reply to 16vCorey:

Add in a better valve design than a poppet - a ball for instance would work way better and not oscillate, but spin.

N Sperlo
N Sperlo Reader
4/21/11 11:25 a.m.

"For the love of God, don't point that damn thing at my eye!"

Edit: That's what she said.

N Sperlo
N Sperlo Reader
4/21/11 11:31 a.m.
nderwater wrote: forget the lasers, can't we just jump straight to warp drive?

Sure, but you have to hit 88 first.

keethrax
keethrax Reader
4/21/11 11:31 a.m.
16vCorey wrote: Now if they'd just actuate valves with electronic actuators instead of camshafts we'd have infinitely variable valve timing and no parasitic drag of (sometimes multiple) camshafts. It seems like it would be easy enough to keep them in time with a crank sensor. Just have a fail safe that would immediately close the valves if there was a problem and you wouldn't have to worry about interference engine issues.

I have a sneaking suspicion (but no solid evidence or specific knowledge) that electronic actuators with a sufficient mtbf under the conditions they'd be operating at would be too pricey to be worth it. But I'd love to be wrong on that, because if I am, there's all kinds of cool E36 M3 you could do.

1 2

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
cCYqmYE9J2sBPAtti8THumsBaC7OuOsSD9ukCZS31MkfOkxqLX4u1YScdPqAxukK