Had a long conversation with the General Manager yesterday about the state of the company and what the owner and Founder-3 are doing. (She's not my boss. She's parallel to me as the person in charge of the front of house where I'm in charge of back of house.)
She made some points I'm wrestling with. I'm pretty sure I disagree, but I respect her enough to want to weigh and consider what she said.
Please note, I am NOT looking for people to agree with me. I want people to honestly evaluate this situation from all angles so I can come to the best understanding of the full of the situation.
I'd say the crux of her argument is: are things not getting better? Or are they not getting better as fast as you'd like them to?
I know many people will respond that's not my problem. That it really is on the owner to work his ass off to get his E36 M3 together before his key employees leave, not vice versa. You're not wrong. But let's set that argument aside.
She pointed out that Owner and Founder-3 are working to create an actual company structure where there will finally be procedures of how things are communicated and decisions are made with advanced planning. Which is something I've been saying we needed for a while.
However, I really don't think a company structure is enough. We also need a viable business plan that realistically maps out how this company will be profitable. I haven't seen that. The owner and Founder-3 have made noises that they're working on something like that, but they haven't shared anything.
The GM countered this observation that, well putting together a real business plan takes a lot of time - maybe 6 months - and they probably just don't want to share until they have something solid together.
I don't think I buy that. We worked on the initial business plan for this company, and from scratch, it didn't take 6 months. We went from zero to taking over a space in 9 months. Most of that time was waiting for the company in the space to realize they'd failed and crossing legal hurdles, transferring liquor licenses, and getting business loans and such. We had to have the business plan in place to *get* the loan.
The Owner and Founder-3 didn't start working yesterday. Founder-3 was supposedly brought on to start working like 8 or 10 weeks ago. Supposedly they were having a bunch of meetings to discuss plans for the company 3 or 4 weeks ago. What's come of that.
And also... I'm part of the founding team, and the only one who's been in the space taking care of things every week for the past 2 years. I'm the only one who really understands production capacity and packaging. I'm the one with information on the COGS for our primary products. That seems like I would be a critical part of developing a business plan. Or if they've decided there is too much friction between me and the owner now to include me in these discussions... that might be an even worse problem.
Finally... the owner just doesn't come in. Or rather, he comes in to watch soccer (but not work), do fun PR stuff (interviews or photos of the medals our liquors won), and for these meetings we've started having.
Yeah, owners can be silent partners. As far as I know, that really only works when they have crap tons of money they can fund someone else to go run a business for them. That when a company is barely scraping by, you show up and work. He has other requirements on his time - taking care of kids while getting divorced - but most weeks he's not in the building at all. I'm not sure if I've seen him come into the business to work 5 hours in any week over the past at least 3 months. He certainly hasn't found 10 hours in that time.
I feel like he's actually become less attentive to the business over the past several months, since he decided to bring in Founder-3. Many pertinent questions and problems that have been brough to him, his answer is, "That's a question for Founder-3." An obvious example - the sales guy saying, "Hey, last year, we talked about getting a delivery vehicle this spring. Can we do that? Doing keg deliveries in my Jeep is really messing up my car." That's a money and budget question. The owner is still the one who controls money and budget. Telling the sales guy to talk to the person who doesn't control money and budget seems like trying to avoid responsibility.
I know many will say, "Not your circus. Not your monkeys." My ideal scenario is still to see this company succeed. I know that will take time. I know some people don't work as fast as others.
I don't see signs that the owner is actually doing what is necessary for this company to be successful. Is there something anyone here can think of that I'm possibly missing? Otherwise, these company structure exercises feel like we're just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.
(Because I know people will ask. I am still talking to businesses and submitting resumes/applications. How much effort I put into that, what sort of offers I would need, and how much runway time before taking a new position will depend heavily on how serious I think the owner actually is about getting this company healthy. I mean, if Sierra Nevada says, "Hey, we want you to run the pilot brewery in Asheville," I'd jump regardless of how well this company is doing.)