David S. Wallens
David S. Wallens Editorial Director
10/31/14 12:27 p.m.

http://sportscar365.com/imsa/jon-field-sentenced-to-prison-for-tax-evasion/

GameboyRMH
GameboyRMH MegaDork
10/31/14 12:43 p.m.

Those who are too good to pay their taxes will tell you that there are two separate terms - "tax evasion" is for stuff that's clearly illegal, and "tax avoidance" is hacking the system using legal methods which you should be able to safely get away with.

In "tax avoidance" you don't outright lie about your income, you just weave a creative story about where it came from and/or where it's going

Things you learn when your dad's an accountant...

Edit: I've heard some stories that are more like "avoidsion" though. One guy with a hilarious setup that is legal in the strictest technical sense, but is making an outright mockery of the tax system, allowing him to dump money into home improvements absolutely tax-free.

Tom_Spangler
Tom_Spangler SuperDork
10/31/14 1:02 p.m.

"I don't say 'evasion', I say 'avoision'!"

Giant Purple Snorklewacker
Giant Purple Snorklewacker MegaDork
10/31/14 1:06 p.m.

Two thumbs UP!

Curmudgeon
Curmudgeon MegaDork
10/31/14 6:37 p.m.

Just goes to show the revenooers will always win in the end no matter how slick the lawyers are.

Streetwiseguy
Streetwiseguy PowerDork
10/31/14 7:26 p.m.

A guy who shall remain nameless had a restaurant, back in the days of hand written counter checks. He had two cash registers at the store, and two identical ones at home. The counter checks were of two different numbering sequences, and he would shuffle them together, so the wait staff would use a random number of each every day. Each check would be rung through one of the tills at the store, then all would be taken home, where one of the sets of checks was discarded, and the remaining ones were run through the tills in the basement. The reports from the store were destroyed and replaced with the ones from home. The spare cash went in the safe in the basement.

I don't think the revenuers ever caught on.

oldtin
oldtin UberDork
10/31/14 7:32 p.m.

For a rich guy, 175k and a sentence under 6 months looks like like hand-slap plea bargain.

oldeskewltoy
oldeskewltoy SuperDork
10/31/14 7:41 p.m.
Curmudgeon wrote: Just goes to show the revenooers will always win in the end no matter how slick the lawyers are... for the 99%

fixed that for ya....

The 1%.... has so many lawyers, and the govt has so many cutbacks.... they just delay, and delay, and then get someone to re-write the law for them....

example... the cap gains tax... 15%? Really, while working people are paying 25%-35%

Kenny_McCormic
Kenny_McCormic PowerDork
10/31/14 8:03 p.m.

There is no government agency more aggressive than the IRS. They don't even care how you got the money(pretty sure they'll even accept "5th Amendment" as a job description), they just want their slice.

Curmudgeon
Curmudgeon MegaDork
11/1/14 6:49 a.m.
Streetwiseguy wrote: A guy who shall remain nameless had a restaurant, back in the days of hand written counter checks. He had two cash registers at the store, and two identical ones at home. The counter checks were of two different numbering sequences, and he would shuffle them together, so the wait staff would use a random number of each every day. Each check would be rung through one of the tills at the store, then all would be taken home, where one of the sets of checks was discarded, and the remaining ones were run through the tills in the basement. The reports from the store were destroyed and replaced with the ones from home. The spare cash went in the safe in the basement. I don't think the revenuers ever caught on.

Back in the 1970's it was not unusual for a business to run two sets of books: one for the IRS, one for the bank. The bank's was typically the more accurate and used to justify loans etc. That's a bit more difficult to do now, but not impossible.

Cash is ALWAYS king, practically untraceable.

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
OJDz2Cu6pV1Lx3LprNff8THXIaCRNxG6w8yMLYJG1q7CoPYSIQ8uu7bxmUsi3o0D