Xceler8x
Xceler8x Dork
8/21/09 10:15 a.m.

Link

Some troll bait for you guys.

z31maniac
z31maniac Dork
8/21/09 10:48 a.m.

Now go look up how much taxes are going up hen the Bush tax cuts expire, I think my bracket jumps from 28% to 34%, or around $4k a year. About $333.33 a month, not an insignificant amount of money.

aircooled
aircooled SuperDork
8/21/09 11:30 a.m.

I wonder if Hitler lowered taxes also? Probably let a tax cut made by Bismark expire too.

OK, OK, I know Bismark was in the late 1800's, but never let the facts get in the way of a perfectly good story.

Bobzilla
Bobzilla HalfDork
8/21/09 11:43 a.m.
z31maniac wrote: Now go look up how much taxes are going up hen the Bush tax cuts expire, I think my bracket jumps from 28% to 34%, or around $4k a year. About $333.33 a month, not an insignificant amount of money.

Don't go bringing in facts and reality. You know those and "Obama" don't go together.

Xceler8x
Xceler8x Dork
8/21/09 2:02 p.m.

You guys are hilarious..

I couldn't pass this flounder by.

aircooled
aircooled SuperDork
8/21/09 3:50 p.m.

That's because you are a Nazi, and Nazi's by nature are generally wacky.

Top Secret was a documentary!!!

Toyman01
Toyman01 HalfDork
8/21/09 5:43 p.m.

Ask me April 14 2010 if it did anything.

oldsaw
oldsaw Reader
8/21/09 10:09 p.m.
Toyman01 wrote: Ask me April 14 2010 if it did anything.

November 3, 2010 wil be a more accurate barometer.

Toyman01
Toyman01 HalfDork
8/21/09 10:24 p.m.
oldsaw wrote:
Toyman01 wrote: Ask me April 14 2010 if it did anything.
November 3, 2010 wil be a more accurate barometer.

Amen to that.

carguy123
carguy123 Dork
8/22/09 9:26 a.m.

And he's cut income by 46%.

2002acr
2002acr New Reader
8/22/09 10:09 a.m.
carguy123 wrote: And he's cut income by 46%.

Explain

oldsaw
oldsaw Reader
8/22/09 11:15 a.m.
2002acr wrote:
carguy123 wrote: And he's cut income by 46%.
Explain

That's a reasonable request, 2002!

But, I'd rather have the President explain why the debt level increased another two trillion dollars (yesterday), while working with 18% lesser revenue.

http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE57K4XE20090821

2002acr
2002acr New Reader
8/22/09 12:28 p.m.
oldsaw wrote:
2002acr wrote:
carguy123 wrote: And he's cut income by 46%.
Explain
That's a reasonable request, 2002! But, I'd rather have the President explain why the debt level increased another two trillion dollars (yesterday), while working with 18% lesser revenue. http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE57K4XE20090821

Me too. It helps that your post has a link attached.

iceracer
iceracer HalfDork
8/22/09 6:09 p.m.

Fact is, the President cannot raise or lower taxes, only congress can do that. Maybe we should blame Pelosi. Also, the president is not responsible for the present economic conditions, he is just stuck with it. Again ,blame congress.

SVreX
SVreX SuperDork
8/23/09 4:20 p.m.

I love this paragraph. While I understand it is not specifically referring to any actual plan, the inference of how politicians can abuse their definitions is astounding. Since when are "illegal immigrants" counted as "Americans"? How can a "non-working individual" get a tax cut? What moron would suggest that a seven year old kid had his taxes cut if his father's withholdings decrease?

Politicians are evil.

This is different than saying that 95+ percent of all Americans will receive a tax cut. Barack Obama sometimes confused his language about this on the campaign trail. He was wrong when he did so. Illegal immigrants, some non-working individuals and families, some retirees, etc. will not be assisted by any of the tax cuts. It’s also somewhat ambiguous whether, say, a 7-year-old kid is considered as having had his taxes cut if his daddy is having less withheld from his paycheck.

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
2T5Jh6LNi0xTTWGPFqtU9J9YaOna8Zal17d6w14UT0WciRoCO0otEenPE9O5CL8A