Streetwiseguy
Streetwiseguy Dork
2/6/11 2:32 p.m.

Two conflicting thoughts: Now there is a 15 year old with some stones, and its nice to see government sanctioned sexism is still alive and well. Read once, then change the sexes of the participants and try to belieive the outcome.

Family and supporters of a Shell Lake teacher sighed with relief in a Saskatoon courtroom Friday after a judge declared her not criminally responsible, due to mental illness, for a sexual relationship with a 15-year-old former student.

Michelle Francoeur was in an extreme "manic state" and lacked the capacity to make rational decisions when she agreed to have sex with the teen boy on several occasions between Sept. 1 and Nov. 20, 2008, Queen's Bench Justice Duane Koch found.

"The criminal law does not want to punish people who were suffering a mental disorder at the time of the act," Crown prosecutor Mitch Piche told reporters outside court.

Francoeur was charged with sexual touching, sexual exploitation and sexual assault against the teen, whose identity is protected by a publication ban, after RCMP received a complaint in December 2008.

She was suspended from her job at the Shell Lake school while the case was before the court.

According to a statement of facts agreed upon by the Crown and defence, during the summer of 2008 Francoeur was mistakenly diagnosed with major depression and prescribed an anti-depressant drug known as Ef-fexor. During the next few months, she underwent a radical change.

Francoeur actually has bipolar disorder rather than depression -and Effexor is known to escalate the "manic" phase experienced by people with bipolarism, which is characterized by extreme feelings of elation, euphoria, racing thoughts, inability to sleep and difficulty appreciating consequences, court heard.

Although she had previously been a very light drinker, Francoeur started using alcohol excessively, Piche told court. She spent money in careless ways, went days without sleep and ate irregularly, losing significant amounts of weight. She talked excessively and took uncharacteristic shortcuts in caring for her daughters, who were five and seven years old.

The changes concerned her family members, who sent a letter to Francoeur's doctor about the situation.

The boy had been in Francoeur's class the previous school year, but no longer attended the school where she taught. They had exchanged text messages once that summer and one night in October he sent her a flirtatious text that resulted in their first sexual encounter, Piche said.

Several more incidents followed, until the boy's mother discovered the situation.

Defence lawyer Aaron Fox noted Franceour would likely not have been charged with a crime if the incidents had happened six months earlier, before changes to the Criminal Code raised the legal age of consent for sexual activity from 14 to 16.

Francoeur's doctor referred her to mental health specialists in December 2008 and she was subsequently diagnosed with bipolar disorder. Her condition has improved significantly with the right medication and regular counselling, court heard.

Psychiatrists and psychologists who examined her in 2009 and 2010 all recommended she be found not criminally responsible for the incidents.

Francoeur did the right thing when she sought help for depression symptoms, but her mental health worsened through no fault of her own, Fox noted. The treatment she has received since then has been effective and her family, school principal and others have been supportive while the charges hung over her head, he added.

Francoeur, who turned 40 on Friday, declined comment when approached by reporters after court.

"She's going to move on," Fox said.

lcoolican@thestarphoenix.com

© Copyright (c) The StarPhoenix

Streetwiseguy
Streetwiseguy Dork
2/6/11 2:34 p.m.

Well, thats oddly laid out...

JFX001
JFX001 SuperDork
2/6/11 2:38 p.m.
Streetwiseguy wrote: Well, thats oddly laid out...

That's what he said....

vwcorvette
vwcorvette Reader
2/6/11 3:24 p.m.

It all starts in English class...

"You must LIE down to get LAID."

914Driver
914Driver SuperDork
2/6/11 3:47 p.m.

So if it were Michael and not Michelle, would it have ended differently?

Sure ....

SVreX
SVreX SuperDork
2/6/11 5:18 p.m.

Oh, I don't know...

I'm sure she's suffered enough pain and suffering, after all the locker room gossip he initiated!

mattmacklind
mattmacklind SuperDork
2/6/11 6:38 p.m.

Its messed up. Honestly, the law (at least where I live) oftentimes seems to take on the responsibility of protecting women from their own bad choices, but punishing males for the same things or worse, punishing the males for being involved in the bad decisions women make. Its like a weird kind of inverse sexism, where women are precluded legally from taking responsibility for bad choices.

Take for example a statutory rape case where the male is 19 and the female 16 or 17. He gets to register as a sex offender for life, is a felon, can't vote, can't buy guns, and the female is treated like a victim of some heinous, felonious crime that was really a consensual sex act between two people very capable of making the decision to engage in the activity. The victim doesn't report the "crime". Her parents do and they want blood.

Another is the criminal prosecution of the failure to pay child support. I won't even get into that.

The other problem cases like the one in the article pose is that they fail to adequately address the damage to young men from what is really predatory and abusive sexual behavior perpetrated by people in positions of trust and authority. What if not just the victim, but the perpetrator were male? That would clearly be abuse. It is incorrect to think that all 15 year old boys want to have sex with their teachers and are somehow undamaged or even minted into manhood by the experience. Young people should be allowed to develop sexually at a pace they select with partners they choose, whether male or female.

Sorry to rant, and I'm not addressing my vitriol on the subject to anyone on this board, just out into the world in general. OK, rant over.

digdug18
digdug18 HalfDork
2/7/11 1:40 p.m.

hmmm, age of consent is 16 there, damn, i think my cousin needs to take a vacation there...

16vCorey
16vCorey SuperDork
2/7/11 3:50 p.m.

I just wanted to post to see if it would be magically italicized.

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
uzOeO3BiHJ33t6OL64lbcehzARshtZhGd2wnUyLuvShC08yTH8m0tbH5QMezwhyp