1 2
bravenrace
bravenrace PowerDork
3/20/13 11:46 a.m.

So I don't have to see the ad anymore.

http://akroncanton.craigslist.org/cto/3651180198.html

cutter67
cutter67 HalfDork
3/20/13 11:54 a.m.

In reply to bravenrace:

that has your name wrote all over it. i could see you DD that. i bet it has a pull thottle on it to keep the engine at certain rpm for the pumps on it that could be your cruise control. the seat most likely has heavy springs for comfort and it has a V6 with a stick so i think it meets everything you were looking for in DD

The_Jed
The_Jed Dork
3/20/13 12:12 p.m.

351 V-6?

It seems like almost every day I hear about some sort of oddball automotive...thing.

bravenrace
bravenrace PowerDork
3/20/13 12:18 p.m.

In reply to cutter67:

Funny guy, UR.

bravenrace
bravenrace PowerDork
3/20/13 12:20 p.m.
The_Jed wrote: 351 V-6? It seems like almost every day I hear about some sort of oddball automotive...thing.

Okay, where do you see 351? I don't see that anywhere in the ad. I thought these had 305 V-6's.

SCARRMRCC
SCARRMRCC Reader
3/20/13 12:22 p.m.

being that is says 7500 v- six.. I would be more inclined to think 450-457 cu inches.

bravenrace
bravenrace PowerDork
3/20/13 12:23 p.m.

In reply to SCARRMRCC:

Why is that?

SCARRMRCC
SCARRMRCC Reader
3/20/13 12:36 p.m.

It was an educated guess... in a way: 7500 cc (or 7.5 liters) is 457 cubic inches, and from what I gather the huge v6's from those days were in the 400-476 cu in range. (interestingly the displacement is supposed to be on stamped on the block). and from what I remember they had 250-ish hp, but 575 ish ftlbs of torque.

the engines they put in pickups were not what was put in those monsters.

Cooter
Cooter New Reader
3/20/13 12:41 p.m.

American Automakers weren't listing their displacements on the fenders metrically(?) back in '70.

They were, however, listing the weight class of the trucks on the fender.

mazdeuce
mazdeuce Dork
3/20/13 12:45 p.m.

That would make a bitchin' car hauler. Just saying.

AngryCorvair
AngryCorvair PowerDork
3/20/13 12:50 p.m.
Cooter wrote: American Automakers weren't listing their displacements on the fenders metrically(?) back in '70. They were, however, listing the weight class of the trucks on the fender.

1964 Pontiac GTO 6.5 Litre

yamaha
yamaha UltraDork
3/20/13 1:06 p.m.

7500 is the chassis size for that truck.

JFX001
JFX001 UltraDork
3/20/13 1:07 p.m.
SCARRMRCC wrote: It was an educated guess... in a way: 7500 cc (or 7.5 liters) is 457 cubic inches, and from what I gather the huge v6's from those days were in the 400-476 cu in range. (interestingly the displacement is supposed to be on stamped on the block). and from what I remember they had 250-ish hp, but 575 ish ftlbs of torque. the engines they put in pickups were not what was put in those monsters.

It's the model designation, much like the Ford F-150 through F-750. The higher the number, the more payload/capacity.

bravenrace
bravenrace PowerDork
3/20/13 1:12 p.m.

I believe this truck could have any V-6 from 305 to 478 cu in.

Duke
Duke PowerDork
3/20/13 1:16 p.m.
Cooter wrote: American Automakers weren't listing their displacements on the fenders metrically(?) back in '70. They were, however, listing the weight class of the trucks on the fender.

While I agree with you that it's probably the weight class, my sister's '68 GTO clearly said 6.5 Liters on the fender badge, which is right around 400 ci.

Mazdax605
Mazdax605 Dork
3/20/13 1:42 p.m.

Man it seems like a lot of truck for a six banger!!!

Zomby Woof
Zomby Woof UberDork
3/20/13 1:45 p.m.

My dad had one like that and it had a 400 cubic inch V6

foxtrapper
foxtrapper PowerDork
3/20/13 1:46 p.m.

Good lord, and the lightest of those truck V6 engines weighs in at 700+ lbs!

Being a 1970 7500 series, looks like it's 401 or a 478. The 351 was the small engine of the time, and seems it went up to the 4000 series trucks.

http://www.6066gmcguy.org/gmcv6a.htm

conesare2seconds
conesare2seconds Reader
3/20/13 4:56 p.m.

That thing is neato burrito. The front bumper would really mow down the zombies FTMFW.

HappyAndy
HappyAndy Dork
3/20/13 6:36 p.m.

I used to know a guy that had a GMC ramp-back tow truck that looked a lot like that.

aussiesmg
aussiesmg UltimaDork
3/20/13 7:38 p.m.

Go check it out Bravenrace, that is all kinds of kewl

The_Jed
The_Jed Dork
3/20/13 7:53 p.m.
bravenrace wrote:
The_Jed wrote: 351 V-6? It seems like almost every day I hear about some sort of oddball automotive...thing.
Okay, where do you see 351? I don't see that anywhere in the ad. I thought these had 305 V-6's.

I did a quick google and found repeated references to a 351 V-6 for the 7500.

New to me.

Hoop
Hoop SuperDork
3/20/13 8:05 p.m.

Yeah, you need to buy that.

fast_eddie_72
fast_eddie_72 UltraDork
3/20/13 9:03 p.m.
mazdeuce wrote: That would make a bitchin' car hauler. Just saying.

Kinda what I was thinking. Might be a trick to engineer a method of getting a car up as high as it looks like the bed of that thing wants to be, though. Maybe a roll-back.

(edit) Oh, well, maybe like this....

jere
jere Reader
3/20/13 9:09 p.m.

google image search found this for an idea of a side view. Apperently the white one has a supercharged v6 old for sale ad

1 2

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
B7sxkXuf0XPEAg6d8Z7XHuK6xPV5oJecgLbFduGauDMkAwVRt4HyJc76vF35dGi2