Indy-Guy
Indy-Guy SuperDork
8/8/17 2:40 p.m.

$1500

Looks to be a good survivor:

TIGMOTORSPORTS
TIGMOTORSPORTS HalfDork
8/9/17 4:52 a.m.

Nice wagon. 83 will be a carb also. All 4 hubcaps are intact. Miles of brown interior.

914Driver
914Driver MegaDork
8/9/17 7:29 a.m.

Miles of brown is better than acres and acres of that red!

drainoil
drainoil HalfDork
8/10/17 5:20 p.m.

This is pretty darn neat.

BlueInGreen44
BlueInGreen44 SuperDork
8/10/17 5:24 p.m.

My wife did say that we might have to start looking for a minivan/ family car soon.

I wonder if this is what she had in mind It would swallow multiple car seats and dogs pretty easily, I bet.

tdrrally
tdrrally Reader
8/10/17 5:31 p.m.

put the new ls based 4.3 in it with a 4l60e trans and get great mileage and still have some style

SEADave
SEADave HalfDork
8/10/17 6:00 p.m.
TIGMOTORSPORTS wrote: Nice wagon. 83 will be a carb also. All 4 hubcaps are intact. Miles of brown interior.

I thought someone said in another thread that the square B-body wagons were some of the last carbureted cars sold in the U.S. This one may also have a 307, and if so that is also one of the last of the classic BOP V-8's, the other divisions losing their own V8's sometime in the 70's or 80's.

Cotton
Cotton UberDork
8/10/17 8:37 p.m.

Pretty cool. I like it.

TIGMOTORSPORTS
TIGMOTORSPORTS HalfDork
8/11/17 4:56 a.m.

this car just keeps drawing you back in. I'd leave the outside the way it is. Interior is really in great shape.

Erich
Erich UltraDork
8/11/17 7:59 a.m.

The problem with these cars for modern family transport is GM used lap belts only for the rear passengers during this generation if I remember right.

Not super conducive to child seats.

Volvo had shoulder belts in their rear starting in the late 1960s.

SVreX
SVreX MegaDork
8/11/17 8:04 a.m.
Erich wrote: The problem with these cars for modern family transport is GM used lap belts only for the rear passengers during this generation if I remember right. Not super conducive to child seats. Volvo had shoulder belts in their rear starting in the late 1960s.

That's correct.

Patrick
Patrick MegaDork
8/11/17 11:33 a.m.

I had that exact car. It was a horrible place to spend time. It smoked heavily out the exhaust for 30 minutes every morning, so I would start it 30 minutes before leaving for work. I hate 307's. My 87 was much less of a pile of crap.

Chadeux
Chadeux Dork
8/11/17 11:57 a.m.

In reply to Patrick:

Might I suggest a solution to the 307?

If I hadn't just bought a dumber car I'd probably be planning a trip to go get this thing. And then start looking for a wrecked/rusty donor truck.

Esoteric Nixon
Esoteric Nixon UltraDork
8/11/17 3:58 p.m.
Patrick wrote: I had that exact car. It was a horrible place to spend time. It smoked heavily out the exhaust for 30 minutes every morning, so I would start it 30 minutes before leaving for work. I hate 307's. My 87 was much less of a pile of crap.

My old Caprice, or a different one? I put like 15k on it driving back and forth to Kent and never had any smoking issues.

Patrick
Patrick MegaDork
8/11/17 5:13 p.m.
Esoteric Nixon wrote:
Patrick wrote: I had that exact car. It was a horrible place to spend time. It smoked heavily out the exhaust for 30 minutes every morning, so I would start it 30 minutes before leaving for work. I hate 307's. My 87 was much less of a pile of crap.
My old Caprice, or a different one? I put like 15k on it driving back and forth to Kent and never had any smoking issues.

Yours was the good one. The 83 olds i had was this one's rusty flapping clone

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
R0sGjxW5NTU1yLaFsgQxasWkVuC00NTwlh9s5Rorc0kdHsZ5Ya15Eyb72zFzWMF8