I don't think I've seen an LTD wagon (or sedan) on the road around here (rustbelt) in years.
Conquest_LR4 wrote: Foxboy = Zero car seatability. I've owned a couple and they shouldn't even put rear seats in a Mustang or Camaro. Baffles me why they even bother with them. ............ Who would try and ride 4 people in them anyway?
I keep posting this. Our last two family cars have been Mustang convertibles. I'm 6'0 and 230+lb's and frequently spend 30-40 mins in the back seat. The only reason we are replacing it with a cute ute is the youngest is now 5'8" and my wife wants AWD for winter driving after this last year.
my zephyr wagon is great, fox platform so the aftermarket is there and i can fit the wife and 6 year olds easily. my car was a one owner car with 106k and aside from needing the front floorpans is solid everywere. the deals are out there if you have some time to shop around.
I had a 79 Zephyr wagon and I so want that car back. The perfect "Fox" based car in my opinion. I also like the 4 headlight setup on the zephyr better than the Fairmont's two headlights. And if you squint the Zephyr looks like a 85 mustang. LOL
As cheap as both are...fox body for a toy, wagon for a winter car. Cheaper still than buying a new Accord and dealing with sales tax and depreciation.
Adrian_Thompson wrote:Conquest_LR4 wrote: Foxboy = Zero car seatability. I've owned a couple and they shouldn't even put rear seats in a Mustang or Camaro. Baffles me why they even bother with them. ............ Who would try and ride 4 people in them anyway?I keep posting this. Our last two family cars have been Mustang convertibles. I'm 6'0 and 230+lb's and frequently spend 30-40 mins in the back seat. The only reason we are replacing it with a cute ute is the youngest is now 5'8" and my wife wants AWD for winter driving after this last year.
I have been lusting mustang convertibles. I would still want one with a cut ute. 94 to 98 body style is stiffer and handles better IMHO....but I still like older fox cars.
You'll need to log in to post.