1 2
96DXCivic
96DXCivic Dork
5/3/10 3:46 p.m.

How much power does the non-turbo Volvo B20 engine make? Is the Suzuki G10 turbo carburetored or fuel injected? Does anyone know of a transmission that could be used to make a Fiat 128 engine RWD? And what are the weights of these engines; 4AGE, 3TC, 2TC, G13B, G10T, Volvo B20, Fiat 128 engine, Ford Duratec 2.3 and 2.0?

m4ff3w
m4ff3w SuperDork
5/3/10 3:59 p.m.

I think the B20 was rated for 124hp. None were turbo though.

m4ff3w
m4ff3w SuperDork
5/3/10 4:00 p.m.

http://www.bacomatic.org/~dw/library/txt/engfyi.htm

Engine Weights

96DXCivic
96DXCivic Dork
5/3/10 4:03 p.m.
m4ff3w wrote: I think the B20 was rated for 124hp. None were turbo though.

Oh just kidding. Which is the turbo engine in the bricks?

TJ
TJ Dork
5/3/10 4:04 p.m.

Take all internet engine weights with a whole shaker of salt. For all the wonderful bits knowledge that can be gleaned from the internet, accurtate apples-to-apples engine weights are not one of them.

I wouldn't trust most of the reported weights farther than I could throw one of the engines.

96DXCivic
96DXCivic Dork
5/3/10 4:08 p.m.
m4ff3w wrote: http://www.bacomatic.org/~dw/library/txt/engfyi.htm Engine Weights

The reference says Suzuki Cultus. Is that the Swift DOHC engine?

96DXCivic
96DXCivic Dork
5/3/10 4:08 p.m.
TJ wrote: Take all internet engine weights with a whole shaker of salt. For all the wonderful bits knowledge that can be gleaned from the internet, accurtate apples-to-apples engine weights are not one of them. I wouldn't trust most of the reported weights farther than I could throw one of the engines.

Don't worry. I am not I just want a rough weight. Although I am pretty sure the Volvo engine weight is right. Someone else told me that weight.

96DXCivic
96DXCivic Dork
5/3/10 4:22 p.m.

Also is the MKIV Midget engine an O or B engine? I can never remember.

m4ff3w
m4ff3w SuperDork
5/3/10 5:16 p.m.
96DXCivic wrote:
m4ff3w wrote: I think the B20 was rated for 124hp. None were turbo though.
Oh just kidding. Which is the turbo engine in the bricks?

B21, B23, B230, and on to newer engines.

zomby woof
zomby woof HalfDork
5/3/10 5:44 p.m.

G10T is 150 lbs. without FW, or alternator.

I've shipped them.

If you're considering the G motor, the pre 89 G10 non turbo was carbed. The 98+ G13k was SOHC 16V, and much lighter than the G13 DOHC. The DOHC head is a little heavy. The k makes 80 hp stock, but can easily make 100.

96DXCivic
96DXCivic Dork
5/4/10 1:03 a.m.
zomby woof wrote: G10T is 150 lbs. without FW, or alternator. I've shipped them. If you're considering the G motor, the pre 89 G10 non turbo was carbed. The 98+ G13k was SOHC 16V, and much lighter than the G13 DOHC. The DOHC head is a little heavy. The k makes 80 hp stock, but can easily make 100.

Do you happen to know the weight of the G13 DOHC?

zomby woof
zomby woof HalfDork
5/4/10 6:05 a.m.

Not offhand, but I can find out.

96DXCivic
96DXCivic Dork
5/4/10 10:04 a.m.

Thanks. Anyone know the weight of the Duratec engines?

ArthurDent
ArthurDent New Reader
5/4/10 11:51 a.m.
96DXCivic wrote: Also is the MKIV Midget engine an O or B engine? I can never remember.

If its a 1500 then its a Triumph engine. If its a 1275 then A-series.

96DXCivic
96DXCivic Dork
5/4/10 12:21 p.m.

It is the 1500 but I know it was used in the Spitfire but I thought it was a standard BL engine.

AutoXR
AutoXR Reader
5/4/10 12:28 p.m.

the answer to all of these questions is

LS1

RossD
RossD Dork
5/4/10 12:52 p.m.

Its not on your list but I weighed a '00 Zetec with auto flywheel, complete from throttle body to exhaust manifold with no belt driven accessories or starter and it came in just under 260lbs.

96DXCivic
96DXCivic Dork
5/4/10 1:47 p.m.

Can the Zetec be used in a RWD application?

AutoXR
AutoXR Reader
5/4/10 2:26 p.m.

Ztec

yes, I have seen it in Locosts, not sure how they do it , but that may be a good start.

You need to use google , the first thread that came up says the Ztec has the same bell housing pattern as a ford T5. <--- some sites say this is correct, some sites..not so much

RossD
RossD Dork
5/4/10 10:04 p.m.

I have a 4 speed transmission from '72 Pinto with the 2.0 L and five out of the six bolt holes bolt up. The last one doesnt have an "ear" on the block because on a redesign of the block, they moved the starter location from the oil pan up to the block (Looking at the flywheel, 4-5 o clock position to the 1-2 o clock position).

The crank has a cast hole for a pilot bearing that will need to be honed to the correct size.

I haven't figured out the clutch situation yet but everyone that does this over in Europe/UK seems to be able to buy Ford replacement parts to make the flywheel/clutch/pressure plate work with the crank position sensor and starter and the transmission/bellhousing spatial concerns. There are aftermarket flywheels and clutches to make it easier but all seem to be from Europe=$$$.

The oil pan bolts dont bolt up to the bellhousing at all but that doesnt bother me. An oil pan from 1.9L CVH Escort has the same oil pan to block pattern and might match the bellhousing bolts too. Not sure yet on this though...

The 4speed is a Ford Type E or Rocket and is the 4 speed version of the 5 speed Type 9 from a Merkur XR4Ti (Ford Sierra). But I believe you need the bellhousing from the Pinto. Actually any Ford from 1970-1972 with a 2.0 and 4 speed rwd will probably be a Type E. The input shaft from the Type 9 might be a different length, though, but might be swap-able from the 4 speed version.

Some links:

Locost USA topic

Burton Power (Euro Car Specs...Beware not always the same as US specs)

Quaife makes repro parts at the racing end of the spectrum. Heres a US distributor. Taylor Race Engineering

RossD
RossD Dork
5/4/10 10:07 p.m.

Oh and I spent $250 on the Zetec and only $100 on the Type E (complete from bellhousing and clutch and pressure plate and fork to shifter and yoke). Its all going in my Locost I plan on building. So cost is a concern and for a modern DOHC 4 cylinder engine and rwd transmission I thought this was pretty low cost.

NGTD
NGTD HalfDork
5/4/10 10:18 p.m.
96DXCivic wrote:
m4ff3w wrote: I think the B20 was rated for 124hp. None were turbo though.
Oh just kidding. Which is the turbo engine in the bricks?

Early 80"s - B21FT Later 80's - B230FT

Not sure if ever in North America? - B23FT

m4ff3w
m4ff3w SuperDork
5/4/10 10:24 p.m.
NGTD wrote:
96DXCivic wrote:
m4ff3w wrote: I think the B20 was rated for 124hp. None were turbo though.
Oh just kidding. Which is the turbo engine in the bricks?
Early 80"s - B21FT Later 80's - B230FT Not sure if ever in North America? - B23FT

We got it one year.

RossD
RossD Dork
5/4/10 10:25 p.m.

One more thing, almost all of the rwd Ford 2.3L 4 cylinders in the US will have the top two bolt holes on the bellhousing up higher on the block than the older Ford 2.0L. That's where all the problem is and if you dont mind hacking up a bellhousing, a Borg-Warner T5 5-speed from a 4 cylinder fox mustang can be made to work.

like this:

RossD
RossD Dork
5/4/10 10:26 p.m.
1 2

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
dT9l5uCYdBXlrrYvTIFEQN9Uq9pDCNU57T1DhFkfsz1IA4chejiKZmdksBtrubzI