NOHOME said:
Six years into the FRS ownership and more than one 1000 mile day in the saddle ( Sturgis to London Ontario non-stop) I call bullE36 M3 on the not suitable for Hwy use. In MY opinion it is exactly what I want for a long drive. Last thing I need is a mobile couch that puts me to sleep. The FRS is an engaging chassis to drive at any speed,and any road conditions; that is what makes it a good GT.
Is it the fastest car on the road? NO, but it is more than fast enough to get you arrested in any of the divided states of 'murica. If it has a problem passing, I have not run into it. When you hit the twisties, it is a pleasure to be in.
If the real need is for a Touring car, then you need to move into the vehicle weight category over 3500 lbs. You need mass for your ass if you wannabe comfy.
Pete
I've only had mine for 6 months, but I'm with Pete on this.
I commute 70 miles round trip per day in my FRS and have done a few longer trips and don't find it taxing at all. It's certainly not Lexus quiet, but I dont find the road noise obtrusive, at least on the all-seasons it came with. The ergonomics seem to work really well for me, so despite being on the smaller side it doesn't feel cramped at all. Reliability has been great so far, biggest known issues are noisy high pressure fuel pumps, condensation in the tail lights, and throwout bearing issues.
Ride/handling balance is great for a DD on stock suspension, and really a great handling chassis overall - well balanced, forgiving, and easy to drive fast. The FRS isn't my primary autocross car, but I've had it out to one event so far and turned some very respectable times (for me anyway) on all-seasons. Again, very easy to drive and it wouldn't take much at all to make a competitive D Street car.
On the downside, the short gearing does make it a bit busy above 80 or so, and also fuel economy isn't that great for what it is. I average 29 or so on my backroad commute, but can knock down 32-33 at reasonable speeds on the highway. The torque dip is also super annoying. I'm convinced that most people's complaints about lack of power are more due to how it's delivered - nothing down low, then a kind of slow building rush up top. If it all hit in a big rush, like a Honda K20 for example, or had a fatter mid range, or revved to the moon I think you would hear a lot fewer complaints. Suppossedly a tune and header really help fill in the torque dip, as well as add some power up top. And there's always FI...
I drove a new WRX back-to-back with one, and while the WRX was way faster and probably handled as well, the FRS felt better to me, a true sports car versus an (admittedly very well executed) hopped up economy car. I will admit I did like the Focus ST a lot too, but if you value good handling and a nimble chassis I think you will like the Twins.