1 2
Driven5
Driven5 PowerDork
1/24/25 2:13 p.m.

In reply to VolvoHeretic :

Roll center isn't actually a very useful term IMO. Just like we have geometric anti-squat and anti-dive, I think it makes more sense in terms of geometric anti-roll. When considered in that context, the measurements and calculations follow suit. Below ground is pro-roll and above ground is anti-roll. Much like the other anti's, it's also possible to keep raising it beyond 100% anti-roll.

eastsideTim
eastsideTim UltimaDork
1/24/25 3:01 p.m.

In reply to Asphalt_Gundam :

Thank you for all the detail.  I'll try to make sure to return to this thread when I am testing, and add a bit more data.

In reply to weedburner :

I'm going to be running a 4L60E(I know) at the challenge, but thank you for the info, it may be useful in the future.  I'm attempting to get a cheap converter that will give me a few hundred extra RPM stall speed, but there is a chance I'll have to run the stock converter.  Rear axle ratio will be 3.42 or 3.73.

 

Thank you everyone else, too.  This has been a good learning experience so far.

eastsideTim
eastsideTim UltimaDork
2/27/25 3:30 p.m.

A potential stupid thought occurred to me.  The S10 Xtreme has a horizontal hop shock running from the rear axle forward to the right frame rail.  I am wondering if that could effectively be used to add a little preload to the right side for the drag race.  I am assuming there'd be no overall advantage to it during the autocross, but it could simply be unbolted.

The main reason I thought of this was that it would only hit the challenge budget for a total of about $15 for a replacement shock, and a few inches of MIG wire to move the axle bracket to the new rear axle.  If I have the time to install it, I may do it just to see what happens during testing.

1 2

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
jcczxRaqgH8vs9I8bjogc3FnHhc5J6zeWMXSFJTxteQON0EH1ywCF0SRQyO9naAB