drainoil
drainoil Dork
10/26/20 2:54 p.m.

Have a bunch of old documents and photos I'd like to scan to digital storage. Anyone have any particular scanning unit they like? 

02Pilot
02Pilot UltraDork
10/26/20 3:19 p.m.

Documents are easy - almost anything will do. What are you planning to do with the photos? If you need high quality scans for reprinting, retouching, or enlargement, you may need to look for something focused on that kind of output.

drainoil
drainoil Dork
10/26/20 3:38 p.m.

Mostly family photos to keep organized by year/decade. Have several hundred. Would like the capability to enlarge a few at some point. Obviously need a good quality unit.

j_tso
j_tso Reader
10/26/20 3:48 p.m.

There may be a photo service near you that can do that.

Depending on the cost it may be better than scanning everything and ending up with a piece of office equipment taking up space.

drainoil
drainoil Dork
10/26/20 4:13 p.m.

I just realized I didn't post this in Off-topic discussion

David S. Wallens
David S. Wallens Editorial Director
10/26/20 4:17 p.m.

In reply to drainoil :

I can move it for you. 

David S. Wallens
David S. Wallens Editorial Director
10/26/20 4:19 p.m.

Our home printer recently died and my scanner's been acting weird, so we recently bought an all-in-one. For about $140, we purchased an HP OfficeJet Pro 8025. So far, totally happy with it.

rodknock
rodknock Reader
10/26/20 4:21 p.m.

Are they film negatives or prints? If they are negatives you want something from the Epson V series. If they are just 35mm negatives, an Epson V370 will work well and it will do regular documents as well. 

FYI scanning negatives is a huge time sink. 

drainoil
drainoil Dork
10/26/20 5:01 p.m.
David S. Wallens said:

Our home printer recently died and my scanner's been acting weird, so we recently bought an all-in-one. For about $140, we purchased an HP OfficeJet Pro 8025. So far, totally happy with it.

Thank you David! And for moving this thread. 
 

rodknock, mostly prints not many negatives.

TurnerX19
TurnerX19 SuperDork
10/26/20 9:08 p.m.

I have had good results with my Epson scanners, BUT they never issue updated drivers for a new version of Windows. I keep a running Windows 95 machine just for that. Prints I scan with a Cannon all in one. Works great, and updated driver was free when Windows went from 7 to 10.

02Pilot
02Pilot UltraDork
10/27/20 6:17 a.m.

In reply to drainoil :

Negatives are whole different thing. If you only have a few it's probably best to have a service do them, as you need a specialized scanner with a backlight, and even then there are many factors in getting decent, printable scans from negatives, especially color.

For prints, you should be able to scan at ~2400dpi initially, but expect to have to do some color correction for reprints to match the originals, or if you want to adjust for fading and other degradation. I strongly suggest you avoid using scanner sharpening (beyond perhaps a very small amount if necessary - some scanners can be pretty soft, but their sharpening tends to be very aggressive) and automatic correction, and do that work manually later on with Photoshop or GIMP or whatever. You'll get much better results in the prints.

I've been using a Canon 8800 for years, but that's a film scanner, so probably overkill for your needs. I think the 9000 is the current version in that line.

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
xFHHiU5KXfN1yQsgK4bCx1brwDmCVjLWekiFO6Bl8DStTmxXE9OPtSlL4qI0sdy9