I have run both of these tires but seasons apart, and I can't definitely say that one is faster than the other. I'm now trying to decide what to buy for the upcoming local time trial season. I have not seen an A-B comparison between these two anywhere and was hoping someone would have some input.
I have a fairly quick Camaro that weighs about 2950 dry with a 525ish hp stroker. 315/35/17 square setup. So that limits my tire choices to R888R, NT01, AR1, or Hoosiers which are too expensive for me to justify.
Based on what I've read the R888R is on the bottom rung and Hoosiers are on the top. Making inferences from test results the AR1s are supposed to be faster than the NT01s. I ran the Nt01s for years but last year I ran AR1s. Unfortunately I changed a lot of other things in the car at the same time that should have made it faster in addition to the tires.
Despite this I only barely set a PR by a few tenths in one track direction but could not beat my previous PR in the other track direction. My subjective impression was that the AR1 was peaky in performance and then dropped off after a couple/few laps, whereas my memory of the NT01 was they took longer to warm up and then performance plateaued for several laps.
Is my memory deceiving me? Does this impression square with anyone else's experience? Did the other changes I made to the car make it slower and the AR1s made up for it?
My current thinking is that I could theoretically pull off a faster lap in the small performance window the AR1 provides if all the stars align but that the NT01 would give me more chances to summon my inner Ayrton Senna to actually pull it off.
Am I just wishfully thinking that the cheaper tire will do what I want (which is to set PRs)? Anxious to hear anyone's thoughts, thanks
P