1 2
Ranger50
Ranger50 PowerDork
9/24/13 5:39 p.m.

Ok, really just a plain jane E36...

http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum/showthread.php?1941747-E36-Ford-Coyote-Swap-Build-Thread

Teh E36 M3
Teh E36 M3 Dork
9/24/13 6:03 p.m.

it's cool for the sake of "different", but I'll be the first to ask, why not LSX? That thing is pretty big! I assume we'll get into the debate about engine weights, DOHC vs pushrods, and etc.

Javelin
Javelin MegaDork
9/24/13 6:06 p.m.

In reply to Teh E36 M3:

Honestly, it looks like cost. While the $1800 he has in the engine is about on par with a similar LS variant, the $600 in the manual trans/clutch combo is significantly less than an LS-spec T56 will run. The trans is the biggest $$$$ item in an LS swap unless you go weaker (T5), older (Muncie), or auto.

stuart in mn
stuart in mn PowerDork
9/24/13 6:29 p.m.

I'm surprised it fit - maybe those Coyote engines aren't as wide as they look.

Teh E36 M3
Teh E36 M3 Dork
9/24/13 6:42 p.m.
Javelin wrote: In reply to Teh E36 M3: Honestly, it looks like cost. While the $1800 he has in the engine is about on par with a similar LS variant, the $600 in the manual trans/clutch combo is *significantly* less than an LS-spec T56 will run. The trans is the biggest $$$$ item in an LS swap unless you go weaker (T5), older (Muncie), or auto.

Good call there- those t56's are like gold. That Coyote sure is big though... look at the strut tower clearance!

z31maniac
z31maniac UltimaDork
9/24/13 7:03 p.m.
Teh E36 M3 wrote: it's cool for the sake of "different", but I'll be the first to ask, why not LSX? That thing is pretty big! I assume we'll get into the debate about engine weights, DOHC vs pushrods, and etc.

Nope, you can ignore all that.

The Coyote sounds AMAZING. The LSx does not.

That's good enough for me.

bravenrace
bravenrace UltimaDork
9/24/13 7:56 p.m.

In reply to z31maniac:

Looks better as well.

Knurled
Knurled UberDork
9/24/13 8:04 p.m.
Javelin wrote: In reply to Teh E36 M3: Honestly, it looks like cost. While the $1800 he has in the engine is about on par with a similar LS variant, the $600 in the manual trans/clutch combo is *significantly* less than an LS-spec T56 will run. The trans is the biggest $$$$ item in an LS swap unless you go weaker (T5), older (Muncie), or auto.

That's something that a lot of people seem to miss. The trans and the clutch are both ridiculously spendy items if you want a manual transmission LS swap.

The problem with Ford is that Ford manual transmissions all suck and Ford automatics suck even harder. At least for the GM, you really can't go wrong with a 4L60.

Knurled
Knurled UberDork
9/24/13 8:07 p.m.
z31maniac wrote: Nope, you can ignore all that. The Coyote sounds AMAZING. The LSx does not. That's good enough for me.

You just need more cam. A hot cam in a 6-liter sounds pretty durn sweet. They get a nice popcorn popper exhaust at idle, and if you're on the throttle, you should be accelerating hard enough that your hearing kinda shuts off due to the Ludicrous Speed Effect, so who cares?

aussiesmg
aussiesmg MegaDork
9/24/13 8:36 p.m.
z31maniac wrote:
Teh E36 M3 wrote: it's cool for the sake of "different", but I'll be the first to ask, why not LSX? That thing is pretty big! I assume we'll get into the debate about engine weights, DOHC vs pushrods, and etc.
Nope, you can ignore all that. The Coyote sounds AMAZING. The LSx does not. That's good enough for me.

Agreed what are the used Coyotes bringing now?

NOHOME
NOHOME Dork
9/24/13 8:56 p.m.

Fron the strip times in the video, not very quick either. I would want 12's for that kind of effort and dispalcement.

Knurled
Knurled UberDork
9/24/13 9:01 p.m.
NOHOME wrote: Fron the strip times in the video, not very quick either. I would want 12's for that kind of effort and dispalcement.

That's IT?

I knew the BMW rear suspension sucked for putting power down, but jeez. Aren't the Mustangs with this engine running 11s with slicks and mild massaging? Aren't the Mustangs with this engine massively heavier?

Ranger50
Ranger50 PowerDork
9/24/13 9:07 p.m.
Knurled wrote: The problem with Ford is that Ford manual transmissions all suck and Ford automatics suck even harder. At least for the GM, you really can't go wrong with a 4L60.

You can't be serious.....

Ranger50
Ranger50 PowerDork
9/24/13 9:10 p.m.
NOHOME wrote: Fron the strip times in the video, not very quick either. I would want 12's for that kind of effort and dispalcement.

His MPH shows around 12.6x potential... but granny shifting on street tires as to not BREAK it, I can live with it.

plance1
plance1 Dork
9/24/13 9:40 p.m.

I like fords, they sound better. I want a V-8 in my volvo brick and everyone says go with LS1 but I think I'd rather have a 5.0 ford with a 5 speed... I can't afford a coyote and I want a manual so from what I'm seeing on this thread I probably couldn't afford the LS since I want a manual.

Streetwiseguy
Streetwiseguy UberDork
9/24/13 9:50 p.m.
plance1 wrote: I like fords, they sound better. I want a V-8 in my volvo brick and everyone says go with LS1 but I think I'd rather have a 5.0 ford with a 5 speed... I can't afford a coyote and I want a manual so from what I'm seeing on this thread I probably couldn't afford the LS since I want a manual.

The 5.0 swap is cake, and well documented. I think the LS is a better motor, but probably is a little tougher to swap.

I think the only place you could fit a Ford Cammer into a 240 is in the back of a wagon...

z31maniac
z31maniac UltimaDork
9/25/13 12:03 p.m.
Knurled wrote:
NOHOME wrote: Fron the strip times in the video, not very quick either. I would want 12's for that kind of effort and dispalcement.
That's IT? I knew the BMW rear suspension sucked for putting power down, but jeez. Aren't the Mustangs with this engine running 11s with slicks and mild massaging? Aren't the Mustangs with this engine massively heavier?

Stock on street tires the Coyote cars are 12.9xx with good driving. IIRC

z31maniac
z31maniac UltimaDork
9/25/13 12:07 p.m.
aussiesmg wrote:
z31maniac wrote:
Teh E36 M3 wrote: it's cool for the sake of "different", but I'll be the first to ask, why not LSX? That thing is pretty big! I assume we'll get into the debate about engine weights, DOHC vs pushrods, and etc.
Nope, you can ignore all that. The Coyote sounds AMAZING. The LSx does not. That's good enough for me.
Agreed what are the used Coyotes bringing now?

That I don't know. Probably too much unless you luck into something. New they are $8k for a crate engine

If you have the scratch you can just buy this though:

http://www.americanmuscle.com/frpp-50-aluminator-xs-engine.html

Factory built 500+hp N/A.

Swank Force One
Swank Force One MegaDork
9/25/13 12:12 p.m.

This is an F150 motor, though... not the Mustang variant. Down on power. It's doing about what i'd expect on street tires.

Bobzilla
Bobzilla UberDork
9/25/13 12:14 p.m.

that's a friggin huge engine.

bravenrace
bravenrace UltimaDork
9/25/13 12:20 p.m.
z31maniac wrote:
aussiesmg wrote:
z31maniac wrote:
Teh E36 M3 wrote: it's cool for the sake of "different", but I'll be the first to ask, why not LSX? That thing is pretty big! I assume we'll get into the debate about engine weights, DOHC vs pushrods, and etc.
Nope, you can ignore all that. The Coyote sounds AMAZING. The LSx does not. That's good enough for me.
Agreed what are the used Coyotes bringing now?
That I don't know. Probably too much unless you luck into something. New they are $8k for a crate engine If you have the scratch you can just buy this though: http://www.americanmuscle.com/frpp-50-aluminator-xs-engine.html Factory built 500+hp N/A.

Try this one for a lot less.

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/fms-m-6007-m50/overview/make/ford

Knurled
Knurled UberDork
9/25/13 4:35 p.m.
Swank Force One wrote: This is an F150 motor, though... not the Mustang variant. Down on power. It's doing about what i'd expect on street tires.

That... explains a lot.

Perhaps I was thinking of the GT500 regarding 11s.

fidelity101
fidelity101 Dork
9/25/13 4:45 p.m.
Knurled wrote:
Javelin wrote: In reply to Teh E36 M3: Honestly, it looks like cost. While the $1800 he has in the engine is about on par with a similar LS variant, the $600 in the manual trans/clutch combo is *significantly* less than an LS-spec T56 will run. The trans is the biggest $$$$ item in an LS swap unless you go weaker (T5), older (Muncie), or auto.
That's something that a lot of people seem to miss. The trans and the clutch are both ridiculously spendy items if you want a manual transmission LS swap. The problem with Ford is that Ford manual transmissions all suck and Ford automatics suck even harder. At least for the GM, you really can't go wrong with a 4L60.

TKO.

done.

if not done, faceplate it!

Knurled
Knurled UberDork
9/25/13 5:06 p.m.

Yeah, but you ever drive a TKO?

Faceplate it indeed!

Strike_Zero
Strike_Zero SuperDork
9/25/13 5:48 p.m.
Streetwiseguy wrote:
plance1 wrote: I like fords, they sound better. I want a V-8 in my volvo brick and everyone says go with LS1 but I think I'd rather have a 5.0 ford with a 5 speed... I can't afford a coyote and I want a manual so from what I'm seeing on this thread I probably couldn't afford the LS since I want a manual.
The 5.0 swap is cake, and well documented. I think the LS is a better motor, but probably is a little tougher to swap. I think the only place you could fit a Ford Cammer into a 240 is in the back of a wagon...

It does fit . . .

Fendbass' car is pretty cool. I got some of his swap parts when he had a 302 in his E36.

1 2

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
I0vqmDvgi3o86Cl4UsMBliKVx8AKSGYk4eAL0I53ZCStoZCKXHdgZxA2l5moLSpI