Is it a sports coupe? A convertible? A utility vehicle? It’s all three.
This 1996 Suzuki X-90 offers its owners a unique and distinctive style with endless possibilities. For maschinenbau, one of our regular forum users, this compact bundle of choices gave him the perfect opportuni…
Try to find one!
Markhogue said:Try to find one!
I thought they all had big Red Bull cans on the back.
That is a vehicle that I never ever understood. Ever.
In reply to Duke :
I still don't understand it either, but I'm having fun.
In reply to maschinenbau :
Fair enough. That's the point, after all.
maschinenbau said:In reply to Duke :
I still don't understand it either, but I'm having fun.
Me when I'm trying to describe why I like cars so much.
I know where there’s one locally–and, no, not parked for good, either.
I've actually been thinking about them recently, and how one would be a near ideal car for me - I rarely have passengers or cargo, it has four wheel drive so it would be good in the winter, and I live in the city where traffic is tight and parking is at a premium so its small size would be an advantage.
In reply to stuart in mn :
I think a Tracker or Sidekick would be more reasonable; same thing with a back seat and cargo area, without being any bigger. But we are not reasonable people, we are GRM people.
maschinenbau said:In reply to stuart in mn :
I think a Tracker or Sidekick would be more reasonable; same thing with a back seat and cargo area, without being any bigger. But we are not reasonable people, we are GRM people.
They're OK too but I never have passengers so a back seat isn't necessary, and the most cargo I've carried in years has been nothing more than a couple bags of groceries. Also, they look more or less like conventional SUVs, just at 3/4 scale. The goofy shape of the X-90 kind of appeals to me.
You'll need to log in to post.
