racer8432955
racer8432955 New Reader
11/2/23 11:28 a.m.

Hello, 

I'm looking to tap into the brain trust here for some help with my brakes. My vehicle is a bit of an oddball, so no oem- to the vehicle parts were able to be used. The vehicle is a 1963 Ford Econoline Pickup. See it here: https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/build-projects-and-project-cars/econoline-pick-up/256677/page1/.

When designing the brake system I believe I made a mistake, and am now unsure on how to correct it. Basically, I am not generating enough stopping power. I put a brake pressure gauge on each caliper and am getting readings between 600-725 psi. This seems to add up to my (bad) design using this math: 50lbs of leg force to a 6:1 pedal ratio= 300 psi. 300psi / 2 capliers = 150psi @ each caliper. 150 x 5 (bore area of a 2.5" piston - GM Metric Caliper)= 750 psi. 

My first mistake is I read wrong somewhere that 750psi is adequate. It should be 1200psi?

So, acknowledging my mistake, the simple solution would seem to go to a smaller bore MC to generate more pressure ? Two problems with that, one I already tried it, and seat of the pants testing resulting in worse stopping power. And, I already have way too much pedal travel. 

The too much pedal travel problem could be solved with a larger bore MC, but that would give me less pressure (but more volume - moving fluid), correct ? So you can see I'm kinda stuck in the middle.

I have hours and hours into brake bleeding and see no air bubbles. I'd like to think thats not the problem. 

some of the details that might help:

- Manual brakes - 4 wheel disc

- GM MC (from a manual disc 70s Corvette)

- GM Metric calipers on front, Ford Exploder rear calipers on an 8.8 axle

- Brake Pads are close to disc and not retracting too far (visual inspection)

- Cheapskate rock auto calipers and brake pads

While it stops good enough for the drag strip and street driving, I'd like to increase the stopping ability for the potential panic situations on the street. Advance thanks for any help. 

boulder_dweeb
boulder_dweeb Reader
11/2/23 12:55 p.m.

Brake booster?

racer8432955
racer8432955 New Reader
11/2/23 1:00 p.m.

In reply to boulder_dweeb :

no brake booster. full manual. 

Driven5
Driven5 PowerDork
11/2/23 1:17 p.m.

You're overthinking the math. It's simply MCforce / MCarea. The manual C3 MC is 1" bore, which means an area of .785 inch. So back calculating, assuming the pedal ratio is right, puts you at 78-95 pounds of force at the pedal in that test.

The number of caliper pistons only affects fluid displacement, not pressure. Multiplying by the area back out at the caliper piston gives you a clamping force, not a pressure.

If a smaller MC made the brakes weaker, there may be some other problem you were encountering, like the MC running out of travel.

A larger MC plus a power booster would give both shorter travel and better stopping, but I'm guessing that there isn't enough room for that?

If you need to stay manual brakes and don't want a longer pedal travel, your main options are larger diameter rotors and/or higher friction pads.

I'm not sure what's out there for stepped-bore MC's, but that could also help with running a smaller working piston, while preventing excessive travel.

triumph7
triumph7 HalfDork
11/2/23 1:19 p.m.

First issue that jumps out at me is that you are dividing pressure readings by the number of calipers.  I can't remember which law it is but pressure throughout a closed system is the same meaning the pressure at the master cylinder is the same as EACH brake cylinder.  If it's different I would look for a leak or blockage.

AngryCorvair (Forum Supporter)
AngryCorvair (Forum Supporter) MegaDork
11/2/23 3:36 p.m.
racer8432955 said:

 https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/build-projects-and-project-cars/econoline-pick-up/256677/page1/.

When designing the brake system I believe I made a mistake, and am now unsure on how to correct it. Basically, I am not generating enough stopping power. I put a brake pressure gauge on each caliper and am getting readings between 600-725 psi. This seems to add up to my (bad) design using this math: 50lbs of leg force to a 6:1 pedal ratio= 300 psi. 300psi / 2 capliers = 150psi @ each caliper. 150 x 5 (bore area of a 2.5" piston - GM Metric Caliper)= 750 psi.

Driven and Triumph are right on the money.

also, you are missing some important steps and mixing up some units in the math:

1. Pedal Force x Pedal Ratio = MC Input Force, not a line pressure

50 lbs x 6:1 = 300 lbs input force to master

2. MC Input Force divided by MC Area = line pressure, which will be the same through the entire brake system.  it is not split between calipers.

300 lbs / 0.7854 sq in = 382 psi

so, if you're seeing 700 psi on your gauges, and your pedal is really 6:1, you must be pushing the pedal with more than 50 lbs.  Line pressure divided by pedal ratio = pedal force:  700 psi / 6 = 117 lbs.  That's a lot of pedal force, but let's go with these values since they match your gauge measurements.

3. Line pressure x caliper piston area = caliper clamping force.  going with the 2.5" piston diameter you stated

caliper piston area = (pi / 4) x diameter squared = 0.7854 x 2.5 x 2.5 = 4.91 square inches

then caliper clamping force = 700 psi x 4.91 in^2 = 3436 lbs of clamping force.   but that's not *braking* force, because we haven't considered the pad friction, the radius of the brake rotor, or the radius of the tire.

4.  clamping force x 2 x pad friction value = caliper friction force.  since you said "rock auto cheapskate pads", lets go with a common pad friction value of 0.3.  then:

3436 lbs clamping force x 2 x 0.3 = 2062 lbs of caliper friction force.  but that's still not braking force, because we haven't considered radius of rotor or radius of tire.

5. caliper friction force x rotor effective radius (distance from center of hub to center of piston) = brake torque.  Metric calipers are typically used on 10.5" diameter rotors, so the effective radius is about half of the rotor diameter minus half of the piston diameter, or 5.25" - 1.25" = 4"

so we are applying a friction force of 2062 lbs at a distance of 4" from hub center, which gives a brake torque of 8248 lb-in, or 687 lb-ft

6. brake torque divided by tire rolling radius = braking force on that tire.  i'll assume your tires are 26" diameter, so their radius is 13".  then

8248 lb-in / 13 in = 634 lb.  that's the brake force you're applying at ONE front tire.  since you've got 2 equal brakes on the front axle, your total front brake force is 1268 lbs for a line pressure of 700 psi, which was generated from a pedal force of around 117 lbs.

Rock Auto tells me Explorer (i chose model year 2000) rear caliper piston diameter is 48 mm = 1.89".  and the rotor diameter is 12.19".  so, if we assume the same pad friction and the same tire size, we can lump all the equations together and calculate the rear brake force as

700 psi x 0.7854 x 1.89 x 1.89 x 2 x 0.3 x (6.09 - 0.95) / 13 = 466 lb of stopping force for one rear brake = 932 lb stopping force on the rear axle.

so for the total vehicle you've got 1268 lb front plus 932 lb rear = 2200 lb brake force.  how much does the truck weigh?  if we assume none of the tires are skidding at that brake force, then your deceleration in G's is simply total brake force divided by total vehicle weight.  if the vehicle weighed 3300 lb, you'd be pulling 0.66 G deceleration.

go to a smaller bore MC to generate more pressure ? Two problems with that, one I already tried it, and seat of the pants testing resulting in worse stopping power. And, I already have way too much pedal travel. 

if seat of pants is correct, it is possible that you bottomed out your pedal travel before you generated maximum pressure.

The too much pedal travel problem could be solved with a larger bore MC, but that would give me less pressure (but more volume - moving fluid), correct ? So you can see I'm kinda stuck in the middle.

yes, a larger MC bore would take more force, but would move more volume.

I have hours and hours into brake bleeding and see no air bubbles. I'd like to think thats not the problem. 

some of the details that might help:

- Manual brakes - 4 wheel disc

- GM MC (from a manual disc 70s Corvette)

- GM Metric calipers on front, Ford Exploder rear calipers on an 8.8 axle

- Brake Pads are close to disc and not retracting too far (visual inspection)

- Cheapskate rock auto calipers and brake pads

your question is how to get more stopping power?  the easiest way is by increasing the friction of your pads.  going from a friction value of 0.3 up to a 0.36 is a 20% increase.  in our simple example, which does not account for things like whether or not friction is constant with temperature or pressure or speed (hint, it's not), going from 0.3 to 0.36 pad friction would take you from 2200 lb to 2640 lb total braking force, and your decel would go up by 20%, from 0.66 G to 0.8 G.

racer8432955
racer8432955 New Reader
11/2/23 4:23 p.m.
Driven5 said:
A larger MC plus a power booster would give both shorter travel and better stopping, but I'm guessing that there isn't enough room for that?

If you need to stay manual brakes and don't want a longer pedal travel, your main options are larger diameter rotors and/or higher friction pads.

I'm not sure what's out there for stepped-bore MC's, but that could also help with running a smaller working piston, while preventing excessive travel.

Yes, no room for  a booster. I found some EBC Yellow pads for my application. That would be an easy test.

I spent a little time looking into stepped bore MC's . It sounds like there functionality could potentially solve my problems. Though, due to my limited space the size of MC could be an issue. 

I did also see drilled and slotted rotors, not larger diameter. Not sure how much that would help?

thanks for your reply.

racer8432955
racer8432955 New Reader
11/2/23 4:26 p.m.
AngryCorvair (Forum Supporter) said:
racer8432955 said:

 https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/build-projects-and-project-cars/econoline-pick-up/256677/page1/.

When designing the brake system I believe I made a mistake, and am now unsure on how to correct it. Basically, I am not generating enough stopping power. I put a brake pressure gauge on each caliper and am getting readings between 600-725 psi. This seems to add up to my (bad) design using this math: 50lbs of leg force to a 6:1 pedal ratio= 300 psi. 300psi / 2 capliers = 150psi @ each caliper. 150 x 5 (bore area of a 2.5" piston - GM Metric Caliper)= 750 psi.

Driven and Triumph are right on the money.

also, you are missing some important steps and mixing up some units in the math:

1. Pedal Force x Pedal Ratio = MC Input Force, not a line pressure

50 lbs x 6:1 = 300 lbs input force to master

2. MC Input Force divided by MC Area = line pressure, which will be the same through the entire brake system.  it is not split between calipers.

300 lbs / 0.7854 sq in = 382 psi

so, if you're seeing 700 psi on your gauges, and your pedal is really 6:1, you must be pushing the pedal with more than 50 lbs.  Line pressure divided by pedal ratio = pedal force:  700 psi / 6 = 117 lbs.  That's a lot of pedal force, but let's go with these values since they match your gauge measurements.

3. Line pressure x caliper piston area = caliper clamping force.  going with the 2.5" piston diameter you stated

caliper piston area = (pi / 4) x diameter squared = 0.7854 x 2.5 x 2.5 = 4.91 square inches

then caliper clamping force = 700 psi x 4.91 in^2 = 3436 lbs of clamping force.   but that's not *braking* force, because we haven't considered the pad friction, the radius of the brake rotor, or the radius of the tire.

4.  clamping force x 2 x pad friction value = caliper friction force.  since you said "rock auto cheapskate pads", lets go with a common pad friction value of 0.3.  then:

3436 lbs clamping force x 2 x 0.3 = 2062 lbs of caliper friction force.  but that's still not braking force, because we haven't considered radius of rotor or radius of tire.

5. caliper friction force x rotor effective radius (distance from center of hub to center of piston) = brake torque.  Metric calipers are typically used on 10.5" diameter rotors, so the effective radius is about half of the rotor diameter minus half of the piston diameter, or 5.25" - 1.25" = 4"

so we are applying a friction force of 2062 lbs at a distance of 4" from hub center, which gives a brake torque of 8248 lb-in, or 687 lb-ft

6. brake torque divided by tire rolling radius = braking force on that tire.  i'll assume your tires are 26" diameter, so their radius is 13".  then

8248 lb-in / 13 in = 634 lb.  that's the brake force you're applying at ONE front tire.  since you've got 2 equal brakes on the front axle, your total front brake force is 1268 lbs for a line pressure of 700 psi, which was generated from a pedal force of around 117 lbs.

Rock Auto tells me Explorer (i chose model year 2000) rear caliper piston diameter is 48 mm = 1.89".  and the rotor diameter is 12.19".  so, if we assume the same pad friction and the same tire size, we can lump all the equations together and calculate the rear brake force as

700 psi x 0.7854 x 1.89 x 1.89 x 2 x 0.3 x (6.09 - 0.95) / 13 = 466 lb of stopping force for one rear brake = 932 lb stopping force on the rear axle.

so for the total vehicle you've got 1268 lb front plus 932 lb rear = 2200 lb brake force.  how much does the truck weigh?  if we assume none of the tires are skidding at that brake force, then your deceleration in G's is simply total brake force divided by total vehicle weight.  if the vehicle weighed 3300 lb, you'd be pulling 0.66 G deceleration.

go to a smaller bore MC to generate more pressure ? Two problems with that, one I already tried it, and seat of the pants testing resulting in worse stopping power. And, I already have way too much pedal travel. 

if seat of pants is correct, it is possible that you bottomed out your pedal travel before you generated maximum pressure.

The too much pedal travel problem could be solved with a larger bore MC, but that would give me less pressure (but more volume - moving fluid), correct ? So you can see I'm kinda stuck in the middle.

yes, a larger MC bore would take more force, but would move more volume.

I have hours and hours into brake bleeding and see no air bubbles. I'd like to think thats not the problem. 

some of the details that might help:

- Manual brakes - 4 wheel disc

- GM MC (from a manual disc 70s Corvette)

- GM Metric calipers on front, Ford Exploder rear calipers on an 8.8 axle

- Brake Pads are close to disc and not retracting too far (visual inspection)

- Cheapskate rock auto calipers and brake pads

your question is how to get more stopping power?  the easiest way is by increasing the friction of your pads.  going from a friction value of 0.3 up to a 0.36 is a 20% increase.  in our simple example, which does not account for things like whether or not friction is constant with temperature or pressure or speed (hint, it's not), going from 0.3 to 0.36 pad friction would take you from 2200 lb to 2640 lb total braking force, and your decel would go up by 20%, from 0.66 G to 0.8 G.

Geez-loueezz, where do I send my payment for education in brake design? Incredible info. thank you very much!

AngryCorvair (Forum Supporter)
AngryCorvair (Forum Supporter) MegaDork
11/2/23 4:28 p.m.

In reply to racer8432955 :

June 2008 issue of GRM has an article with all these equations, so the cost of your education could be one back issue of the magazine or a library card.  ;-)

racer8432955
racer8432955 New Reader
11/2/23 4:41 p.m.

Going down the rabbit hole of stepped bore MC's led me to what a message board post on the hamb that describes my situation very closely. https://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/threads/gm-metric-low-drag-calipers-fixed.1202460/

Here and other places I read about my GM Metric Caliper being "low-drag" from the factory starting in 1980. Well, mine are from a 89 S10. The low drag calipers allowed the piston to retract further. One person sited info that these calipers require " a stepped-bore quick take-up master cylinder".  My MC (70s Vette) is not this type of MC.  I did find that a 1985 S10 with manual disc fronts is this type of MC. A couple others spoke of the same issue and fixing it with made for racing calipers, not low drag. Anyone familiar with this?

At this point, I'm a little out over my skis on this one. I don't mind trying a couple different parts as they are in the 100s not 1000s. I'd like keep from re-fabbing the caliper brackets and mc mount (under the dash, welded to cage). 

Thanks again to everyone who helped out so far!

AngryCorvair (Forum Supporter)
AngryCorvair (Forum Supporter) MegaDork
11/2/23 5:10 p.m.

I'd be willing to bet that the master cylinder mounting pattern is the same between the mid-70's corvette and the S10 quick take-up.  That will be your best bet for improving (ie shortening) pedal travel without digging too deep.  I'd try that first.  Even without changing the output of your brake system, the shorter pedal travel will make it feel a lot better.

Driven5
Driven5 PowerDork
11/2/23 5:16 p.m.
racer8432955 said:

I did also see drilled and slotted rotors, not larger diameter. Not sure how much that would help?

None.

The S10 manual MC looks to have a .938" piston, plus the 1.25" 'quick take up' bore step. With .691 area, that should give a ~13% increase in pressure for the same pedal force. Not huge, but certainly an improvement.

I'm not sure what diameter the 'smaller' master you tried was, but used in conjunction with the 'racing' Metric calipers that might give an even bigger improvement, albeit at a bigger cost and still some potential for excess pedal travel or MC bottoming.

Another thought is that since there is reason to believe that you ran out of MC travel on the smaller MC, that your current MC may be running out of travel too... Just not as early. That would mean you still might not be getting all the stopping power that you otherwise should be. I agree that the S10 MC sounds likely to be a smart move if you can mate it up.

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
dfHu0d0ZBqGZlayyL2hXeivPcw8pfBPMY4N9c03W6lAvyX7NBr1BQtoZB5ItLuIN