Colin Wood
Colin Wood Associate Editor
10/23/23 1:00 p.m.
feature_image

Sure, the Z3 M Coupe gets all the attention, but what about the Z3 M Roadster?

This example features some desirable factory options like a limited-slip differential, power-retractable soft top and 17-inch Style 40 wheels.

The Z3 also comes fitted with a bevy of upgrades that include a Vanos u…

Read the rest of the story

David S. Wallens
David S. Wallens Editorial Director
10/23/23 1:19 p.m.

Good color combo. (Go Dawgs, too.)

wspohn
wspohn SuperDork
10/23/23 2:18 p.m.

I've never liked the loosey goosey handling on the Z3 M - the Z4M is worlds apart in that regard.  It isn't dangerous or anything, it is just not what it could have been.

t44tq
t44tq New Reader
10/26/23 1:58 p.m.

None of the items you mentioned are optional; they're standard- LSD, power soft top, 17" Style 40 wheels.

The reason for the Coupe's existence was the 25% stiffer chassis, which is noticeable. The Z3 isn't known for structural rigidity. Compared to something like the base 1.9, the M has a lot more grip, power and weight, all of which don't help with how flexible the chassis feels.

If you're buying it as a nice weather cruiser, it's fine. Just don't mistake for some sort of hardcore sports car. The Z4M is much better as a sports car.

Pete. (l33t FS)
Pete. (l33t FS) MegaDork
10/26/23 7:05 p.m.
wspohn said:

I've never liked the loosey goosey handling on the Z3 M - the Z4M is worlds apart in that regard.  It isn't dangerous or anything, it is just not what it could have been.

It's basically an E30 M3 suspension wise, no?

Slippery
Slippery PowerDork
10/26/23 7:17 p.m.
Pete. (l33t FS) said:
wspohn said:

I've never liked the loosey goosey handling on the Z3 M - the Z4M is worlds apart in that regard.  It isn't dangerous or anything, it is just not what it could have been.

It's basically an E30 M3 suspension wise, no?

Correct. Dont lift. 

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
nkV05WYWhD24K1c9IAQtlJTPOxS1WqpApDI3Gt9OYmf5oiuxEL6OzZ5zT3SFDSKV