Curmudgeon wrote: Or the one other who I will NOT mention because Margie has super powers and would burn me to a crisp with her laser beam vision if I uttered the name.
Trying to figure out who this was... How long ago?
Curmudgeon wrote: Or the one other who I will NOT mention because Margie has super powers and would burn me to a crisp with her laser beam vision if I uttered the name.
Trying to figure out who this was... How long ago?
mtn, it was a LONG time ago. Some of the old timers on the board such as 914Driver probably know exactly who I am thinking of.
aircooled wrote:oldsaw wrote: ....Keep in mind that you're just inviting trouble when you (or anyone) takes a stance that one "side" is good/evil or is the cause of/answer to all "our" problems. Things are a lot more complicated than that.Exactly! One of the best way to approach a lot of these "arguments" is to try and help "the other side" prove their argument. Then do you best to remove the "sides". One of the basic truisms in this world, that I believe in at least, (notice how I didn't make it black and white?) is that almost all things are on a continuum and very few things lie at the extremes (e.g. ADD exists, but it is not an on or off switch, we all likely have a bit of ADD in us, its a matter of how much). There are many who will do there best to make you believe this is not the case, please do not listen to them. I think if MGuar is in anyway feeling he has slighted the board, he should start a thread with a full story and explanation of this: That will gain you HUGE points on this board!
Nope, that story thing won't work with me. He has to let me drive it in anger.
Curmudgeon wrote: mtn, it was a LONG time ago. Some of the old timers on the board such as 914Driver probably know exactly who I am thinking of.
Who?
Curmudgeon wrote: ...Or the Canadian kid, don't remember his name, who used to go on American citizen witch hunts and got smacked with the ban hammer.
Haha, I knew him (through auto-x). He was actually a really funny guy and very easy to get along with in person, but every time he got on here it was facepalm city. Some people turn just plain not normal when they go online.
Lemme tell ya, nobody here comes close to the ex-patriot Brit that used to haunt the British car forums, especially Spitfires. He would be the King of all trolls.
I remember that Canadian guy, we would've been happy to disown him. Major chip on the shoulder. Then there was that dude that seemed to be my own personal troll... left pissy comments after all my posts. Dunno what happened to him, boohoo...
spitfirebill wrote: Lemme tell ya, nobody here comes close to the ex-patriot Brit that used to haunt the British car forums, especially Spitfires. He would be the King of all trolls.
Did he publish a yellowbook?
@ZW:
I honestly can't remember his username. His real name was Josh... Geez, this would have been back in 2004 or so. I think he may have been the first high profile troll to get banhammered from here, the (old!) board was pretty new then.
Maybe its just me, but I think this may give some insight into what caused this thread. caution language
The internet is a strange beast. Most of my friends are the nicest people ever in person, but if you venture to my little corner of space, you'd find how we treat each other on the internet. Personally, I do one of two things. A- ignore the hell out of them and continue on my way, or B- troll em right back. Depends on my mood mostly.
That being said, this is DEFINITELY the most civilized board I've ever frequented.
Curmudgeon wrote: mtn, it was a LONG time ago. Some of the old timers on the board such as 914Driver probably know exactly who I am thinking of.
Ah, yes. "You-Know-Who" or "He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named." Actually admitted to being a troll once, and still stayed around another year or two before he got troll-whacked.
93EXCivic wrote:spitfirebill wrote: Lemme tell ya, nobody here comes close to the ex-patriot Brit that used to haunt the British car forums, especially Spitfires. He would be the King of all trolls.Did he publish a yellowbook?
Sure did.
This really shouldn't be an 8-page-long thread, and if I'm the voice of reason, we're ALL berkeleyed.
I like candy. John Candy. I think I'll go watch "Stripes."
In reply to poopshovel:
Oh mighty voice of reason. Guide us to harmony and enlightenment.
Do us all a favor and crack a few beers first. Better make it a case.
Wow. Great thread, glad I'm not a troll. Hey, they'll have to re cast Stripes, now there are two Canadians here.
Oh, and this thread needs more Python, with some Star Wars theme, since I know we have some fans at the magazine.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CLwxObfaNE&feature=youtube_gdata_player
In reply to Lesley:
Do you call that a post? That was a terrible post. If you don't like Canada so much, you are free to leave...
how was that?
mistanfo wrote: Oh, and this thread needs more Python, with some Star Wars theme, since I know we have some fans at the magazine. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CLwxObfaNE&feature=youtube_gdata_player
That was more entertaining that this entire thread.
I once had a 3 hour argument over whether or not Kool Aid man wore pants. This was before smartphones, so I couldn't google it and I was at work. I ended up both winning AND losing it. (he got pants sometime in the late 80's early 90's).
mndsm wrote: I once had a 3 hour argument over whether or not Kool Aid man wore pants. This was before smartphones, so I couldn't google it and I was at work. I ended up both winning AND losing it. (he got pants sometime in the late 80's early 90's).
no pants
T.J. wrote: In reply to Lesley: Do you call that a post? That was a terrible post. If you don't like Canada so much, you are free to leave... how was that?
Bite me! Oh crap... am I the troll?
This topic is locked. No further posts are being accepted.