ransom wrote: In response to HiTempguy and oldsaw: I should have said "These investors do not want to see change ahead of their own schedule". The schedule which maximizes their profits may not be the best for the rest of us.
It honestly will be, those profits pay us, the workers. My evidence I submit is the global E36 M3 show that happened in 2008. The companies are much more wise to make sure the market stays HIGH, but not volatile. While less volatility makes it harder to grow/beat out other companies, it makes life a lot more easy in the long run. I did read your full post, I just disagree with it on a fundamental level. It will not be in the best interest of business to destroy this planet, for many reasons.
