Otto Maddox wrote: In reply to poopshovel: I am not clear. Did you care a lot about Clinton's weenie suckage? Thus you care a lot about Newt's?
Clinton's gay? Does Hillary know? 
Otto Maddox wrote: In reply to poopshovel: I am not clear. Did you care a lot about Clinton's weenie suckage? Thus you care a lot about Newt's?
Clinton's gay? Does Hillary know?
Snowdoggie wrote: Did anybody else think it was creepy when Romney put his hand on Rick Perry's shoulder in the last debate. He reminds me of a slick used car salesman.
Just a little morsal--Romney's father was the first CEO of AMC (after the merger of Nash & Hudson).
ST_ZX2 wrote:Snowdoggie wrote: Did anybody else think it was creepy when Romney put his hand on Rick Perry's shoulder in the last debate. He reminds me of a slick used car salesman.Just a little morsal--Romney's father was the first CEO of AMC (after the merger of Nash & Hudson).
I guess you would have to be slick to sell those.
In reply to Snowdoggie:
In other unrelated but interesting news, Kurt Vonnegut had a Saab dealership decades ago.
Snowdoggie wrote:Otto Maddox wrote: In reply to poopshovel: I am not clear. Did you care a lot about Clinton's weenie suckage? Thus you care a lot about Newt's?Clinton's gay? Does Hillary know?
I don't know. Ask Poopie. He has a lot of interest in the subject.
Otto Maddox wrote:Snowdoggie wrote:I don't know. Ask Poopie. He has a lot of interest in the subject.Otto Maddox wrote: In reply to poopshovel: I am not clear. Did you care a lot about Clinton's weenie suckage? Thus you care a lot about Newt's?Clinton's gay? Does Hillary know?
What IS it with this thread. We started talking about Herman Cain. Now it's all about woman's holes and weenies.
Snowdoggie wrote: Now it's all about woman's holes
Wait, what were we having a conversation about? I seem to be distracted... 
Otto Maddox wrote:Snowdoggie wrote:I don't know. Ask Poopie. He has a lot of interest in the subject.Otto Maddox wrote: In reply to poopshovel: I am not clear. Did you care a lot about Clinton's weenie suckage? Thus you care a lot about Newt's?Clinton's gay? Does Hillary know?
You brought it up, berkeley stick.
In reply to poopshovel:
You seem unable to write a sentence without a weenie reference.
But I did laugh when I read berkeley stick.
Otto Maddox wrote: In reply to poopshovel: You seem unable to write a sentence without a weenie reference. But I did laugh when I read berkeley stick.
Its a political thread. Politics is all about putting your weenie everywhere, just ask Bill Clinton, Newt Gingrich, John Edwards, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Rudy Giuliani, Larry Craig, John F. Kennedy, Teddy Kennedy, Bobby Kennedy, every other bloody politician named Kennedy, John Ensign, Mark Foley, Gary Condit, Barney Frank, Robert ummm...Packwood, Anthony...uhh urrrr.....WIENER.....
Do I need to go on?
This thread is awesome
....Warren G. Harding, Grover Cleveland, Thomas Jefferson (but I think it was with a slave that he owned, so that's ok), Benjamin Franklin...
Just checked into this thread, fearing what I'd find, and have been pleasantly surprised to see it's developed into one of the most intelligent political discussions I've seen in a long time.
Margie
Marjorie Suddard wrote: Just checked into this thread, fearing what I'd find, and have been pleasantly surprised to see it's developed into one of the most intelligent political discussions I've seen in a long time. Margie
Hasn't the past page focused on the distribution of political penises?
Come to think of it, I guess you're right.
Salanis wrote:Marjorie Suddard wrote: Just checked into this thread, fearing what I'd find, and have been pleasantly surprised to see it's developed into one of the most intelligent political discussions I've seen in a long time. MargieHasn't the past page focused on the distribution of political penises? Come to think of it, I guess you're right.
I don't get it. We went from tax reform to weenies in twelve pages.
Salanis wrote:Marjorie Suddard wrote: Just checked into this thread, fearing what I'd find, and have been pleasantly surprised to see it's developed into one of the most intelligent political discussions I've seen in a long time. MargieHasn't the past page focused on the distribution of political penises? Come to think of it, I guess you're right.
Isn't that the definition of an election.
Marjorie Suddard wrote: Just checked into this thread, fearing what I'd find, and have been pleasantly surprised to see it's developed into one of the most intelligent political discussions I've seen in a long time. Margie
We're gettin' kinda good at this. Before long, we'll respect each other's opinions and treat one another with mutual respect! Gee, imagine if any politicians tried that.
In reply to fast_eddie_72:
Politicians only respect each other behind closed doors (maybe).
We do it out in the open.
THAT'S not what they do behind closed doors!
Oh wait, politicians do THAT out in the open! 
Speaking of politicians respecting each other, I think Cain and Paul don't have much for each other. I think Cain has as much said it.
Salanis wrote:Marjorie Suddard wrote: Just checked into this thread, fearing what I'd find, and have been pleasantly surprised to see it's developed into one of the most intelligent political discussions I've seen in a long time. MargieHasn't the past page focused on the distribution of political penises? Come to think of it, I guess you're right.
What happens when you give a politician Viagra?
He gets taller!
Snowdoggie wrote:Salanis wrote:I don't get it. We went from tax reform to weenies in twelve pages.Marjorie Suddard wrote: Just checked into this thread, fearing what I'd find, and have been pleasantly surprised to see it's developed into one of the most intelligent political discussions I've seen in a long time. MargieHasn't the past page focused on the distribution of political penises? Come to think of it, I guess you're right.
I can't believe it took so long either.
This sounds fair to some of you guys?
Under Herman Cain's 9-9-9 tax plan, the managers of private equity funds--one of the most lucrative financial structures on Wall Street--would pay, on average, an income tax rate of just around 6 percent.
An accountant with the American Institute of CPAs prepared an analysis on Friday, at the request of Yahoo News, that found that Warren Buffett would likely pay no income taxes under Cain's 9-9-9 plan.
My biggest problem is that if you turn it over it becomes the 6-6-6 plan
Otto Maddox wrote: This sounds fair to some of you guys? Under Herman Cain's 9-9-9 tax plan, the managers of private equity funds--one of the most lucrative financial structures on Wall Street--would pay, on average, an income tax rate of just around 6 percent. An accountant with the American Institute of CPAs prepared an analysis on Friday, at the request of Yahoo News, that found that Warren Buffett would likely pay no income taxes under Cain's 9-9-9 plan.
That is the part of the plan I don't agree with. To me, income is income, it doesn't matter where it comes from. If you acquire money during the course of the year from anything, you just got an income. It should all be taxed. That is where Herman's plan falls short with me.
You'll need to log in to post.
