Antihero said:
Coddling/helping hasn't got him moving so it's time to do stick and not carrot.
I disagree with this. Because no one has yet *tried* the carrot.
Coddling is not a carrot. Coddling is keeping them in a soft room with no carrots or sticks. It is avoiding consequences (both positive and negative) for actions.
"The Carrot" is positively reinforcing desired behavior.
You first have to identify what positive behaviors you want to encourage. You need to keep this realistically small. It's easy to say, "I want to encourage getting out of the house and getting a job," but there are a LOT of behaviors that go into that. You need to break those down into their component behaviors. Things like: research an opportunity, send contacts, follow up, go in, etc. You then need to reward positive behavior changes. He needs to be able to see that proactive independent actions benefit him in the short term.
Then you demonstrate the stick so there are consequences for negative behaviors. Keeping in mind that absence of a positive behavior is *not* the same as a negative behavior. Identify what those negative behaviors are and what appropriate corrections are.
All of this needs to ALL happen. It's "carrot AND stick" not "carrot OR stick".
For an example... we're teaching our dog to play fetch. This is a much smaller challenge, but it's more complicated than it would seem. He likes chasing things, but then want to worry or chew on them, and play keep-away. So we need to teach him: return with the ball, back to our feet, pay attention to us, drop the ball, pay attention to us, stop guarding the ball, let us touch the ball, let us pick up the ball. We are using treats to encourage each of these behaviors. The "stick" is verbal correction if he growls, nips, or physically acts against us to guard the ball.
Kicking the kid out of the house is a stick, but not one that can be directly connected to a specific behavior. It also doesn't teach what behaviors are positive and rewarding.