jrw1621 wrote: Your wrong.
This far in to this thread, and no grammar Nazis? FOR SHAME.
Should be you're wrong.
jrw1621 wrote: Your wrong.
This far in to this thread, and no grammar Nazis? FOR SHAME.
Should be you're wrong.
mndsm wrote:jrw1621 wrote: Your wrong.This far in to this thread, and no grammar Nazis? FOR SHAME. Should be you're wrong.
Should also be "this far into"
I'm here for the passive-aggressive fest!
Can we all agree that limp weak hand shakes are the worst thing in as far as human touch goes?
ThePhranc wrote:
Also a clammy wet hand
Osterkraut wrote: I'm here for the aggressive Bob Costas-fest!
Ftfy
mndsm wrote:jrw1621 wrote: Your wrong.This far in to this thread, and no grammar Nazis? FOR SHAME. Should be you're wrong.
No, there wrong.
/irony
Reminded me of this:
I don't care who is right or wrong...I have ice cream!
Bruce
Your mom.
Did you hit him first or was it unprovoked?
Lesley wrote:mndsm wrote:Should also be "this far into"jrw1621 wrote: Your wrong.This far in to this thread, and no grammar Nazis? FOR SHAME. Should be you're wrong.
OBTW: y'all are't wrong. You are just being economical with your correctness.
Anti-stance wrote:ThePhranc wrote:Also a clammy wet hand
It's up there with the worst, that's for sure.
bravenrace wrote:Anti-stance wrote:It's up there with the worst, that's for sure.ThePhranc wrote:Also a clammy wet hand
The shop here has concluded it isn't #1. That distinction goes to sack touch in a DP.
In reply to ThePhranc:
Don't bother inviting me to one your shop picnics.
ThePhranc wrote: The shop here has concluded it isn't #1. That distinction goes to sack touch in a DP.
Dude, if you're actually involved in a DP, I think you're LONG past worrying about a little sack-to-sack contact. I'm just sayin'.
Does the "D" stand for double? I just want to make sure I am on the same page.
Duke wrote:ThePhranc wrote: The shop here has concluded it isn't #1. That distinction goes to sack touch in a DP.Dude, if you're actually involved in a DP, I think you're LONG past worrying about a little sack-to-sack contact. I'm just sayin'.
I just asked what the worst type of touching between two people would be. There was debate and thats what won out.
I was all set to tell 914driver that his ideas of what a woman would feel were noteworthy when making a diary entry were backwards....then I read the man's thoughts...CLASSIC.
Having grown up with 4 sisters and not having any brothers until I was about to leave home, I am constantly amazed how women their ideas/opinions are THE most logical, not to mention they think men fixate on the trivial (tho that "diary entry" does seem to make the case both sides do that to some extent).
What is worrying, is that in today's "climate", folks think there are only 2 sides to any argument: Mine, and the wrong side.
Duke wrote:ThePhranc wrote: The shop here has concluded it isn't #1. That distinction goes to sack touch in a DP.Dude, if you're actually involved in a DP, I think you're LONG past worrying about a little sack-to-sack contact. I'm just sayin'.
If I had a Daytona Prototype I could take an afternoon off from touching my sack.
I think birds of contact would flock away from smelly oil in order to fluff their wings on propeller blades when it's not raining.
I was wondering why the ball was getting bigger, and then it hit me.
My opinion is whatever SWMBO says it should be...
jrw1621 wrote: Your wrong.
no, YOU'RE wrong
You'll need to log in to post.
