I had my car in for service, and while waiting, I see a Boxter on the "DEALS DEALS DEALS!" used car lot for $9,000. I stroll over, and lo and behold, it looks pretty good. Base model, 5 speed, under 60,000 miles. Interior and exterior are in great shape. I quickly walked away before I did anything stupid (I'd get financing in a heartbeat) but I can't stop thinking about it. Stories of recent purchases on this board are not helping either. Why so cheap? What catastrophic failure awaits at the 60,000 mile mark?
Woody
MegaDork
3/27/14 10:35 a.m.
What year is it? 2.7s are better and the glass rear window is a nice bonus.
I personally prefer the 2.5, but I'm an oddball that doesn't want more than 200 horsepower in my sportscar...
9,000 is about the going rate for a 60,000 mile car, but you'll want to have the intermediate shaft bearing upgraded ASAP, and check for a recent water pump install in the records.
DO IT!
I'm hearing the siren song, as well. I'm watching all of the Boxster/Cayman threads very closely.
What year was it exactly?
They do sound fantastic.....really, really fantastic. They still scare me....but man, that SOUND!
It's a 1999 model with the 2.5. It may be underpowered and slow compared to a 911 or later Boxster S, but compared to a MK1 MR2 or a Kia Rondo, it will be tons of fun. And I looked it up, it has just over 83,000 miles. That makes a little difference.
Maroon92 wrote:
I personally prefer the 2.5, but I'm an oddball that doesn't want more than 200 horsepower in my sportscar...
I did too! I even bought a 3.2S and still preferred my original 2.5 for driving.
BradLTL wrote:
Maroon92 wrote:
I personally prefer the 2.5, but I'm an oddball that doesn't want more than 200 horsepower in my sportscar...
I did too! I even bought a 3.2S and still preferred my original 2.5 for driving.
The 3.2 is a great motor, but I think the 6-speed kills a lot of the fun of driving that car. The taller geared 5 speed is a great trans, and absolutely bulletproof.
Interestingly, my 95 Audi has the same 012 transmission, and in that car, it could really use a 6th gear...
I started the other Boxster thread, but they sold it before I got back into town. Now I've drank the Kool Aid though, so I've been actively searching for another. If you really don't want one, do not drive it! data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09242/092424d2e69cd72ee6e1c04f89beef4453d93432" alt=""
Maroon92 wrote:
Interestingly, my 95 Audi has the same 012 transmission, and in that car, it could really use a 6th gear...
So does the Passat... after I wore the syncros out, I thought about buying a Passat transmission (much cheaper because it doesn't say 'Porsche' on it) to replace.
Turned out to not matter, I had a guy buy the car with worn syncros and no real negotiation on price.