http://seattle.craigslist.org/see/cto/4591912255.html
Ugh.
"over $37k in it....The car will put out over 300 hp"
You could've bought a 2012 v6 mustang from Hertz for less than 1/3rd of that.
calteg wrote: "over $37k in it....The car will put out over 300 hp" You could've bought a 2012 v6 mustang from Hertz for less than 1/3rd of that.
While i severely doubt both of the figures this moron has put in his ad, if running properly, this thing should have no problems blowing the doors off a Hertz V6 Mustang.
Swank Force One wrote:calteg wrote: "over $37k in it....The car will put out over 300 hp" You could've bought a 2012 v6 mustang from Hertz for less than 1/3rd of that.While i severely doubt both of the figures this moron has put in his ad, if running properly, this thing should have no problems blowing the doors off a Hertz V6 Mustang.
Have you driven a V6 Mustang recently? Remember it beat the Evo and STI in car and drivers one lap of VIR test thing.
Adrian_Thompson wrote:Swank Force One wrote:Have you driven a V6 Mustang recently? Remember it beat the Evo and STI in car and drivers one lap of VIR test thing.calteg wrote: "over $37k in it....The car will put out over 300 hp" You could've bought a 2012 v6 mustang from Hertz for less than 1/3rd of that.While i severely doubt both of the figures this moron has put in his ad, if running properly, this thing should have no problems blowing the doors off a Hertz V6 Mustang.
I'm aware. I'm still sticking by what i said. Power/weight should be in the Civic's favor, and i'll hustle a light car around any day of the week.
Also see: Andy Hollis.
Bobzilla wrote: yeah, but if you invested $37k into a V6 mustang... what would you have? Sorry... OVER $37k.
Brain damage?
Swank Force One wrote:Bobzilla wrote: yeah, but if you invested $37k into a V6 mustang... what would you have? Sorry... OVER $37k.Brain damage?
Probably had that first if you're investing "over $37k" into either of them.
Wasn't impressed with the rental Mustang I had...
Even at the absolute HEIGHT of my rotardedness, I couldn't fathom putting $37k into a single car, and still have nothing to show for it. I bet the kid could have found an NSX for about that cash.
Bobzilla wrote:Swank Force One wrote:Probably had that first if you're investing "over $37k" into either of them.Bobzilla wrote: yeah, but if you invested $37k into a V6 mustang... what would you have? Sorry... OVER $37k.Brain damage?
Luckily, the most i'd invest into that particular Civic would be about $3000. What dumbass put into it is his problem.
I can't get a whole lot of 2012 era V6 mustang for $3k.
Fueled by Caffeine wrote:Desmond wrote: Bill, that NSX is gorgeous.automatic DOH!
Exactly my thoughts lol. Also I never knew the nsx came in automatic.
You'll need to log in to post.