Under $2k.
I used to see them occasionally but not anymore.
I would really like to find an Opel Kadett or Manta but don't see those either.
Under $2k.
I used to see them occasionally but not anymore.
I would really like to find an Opel Kadett or Manta but don't see those either.
Do a rat rod truck, uncorked 13b. botched s10 chassis parts, exposed engine. lots of cab rust circa 1930s
JFX001 wrote: Evan...you remember that thing that I have in my garage???
Landcruiser? I think that may be a bit heavy.
EvanB wrote:JFX001 wrote: Evan...you remember that thing that I have in my garage???Landcruiser? I think that may be a bit heavy.
No...the other one...
...doofus.
In reply to JFX001:
Yea that would be cool...it would probably take a bit to get the rotary mated up to the stock trans.
Just did. Go forth and search for viable adaptors and let me know. No biggie either way, as it's not going anywhere until you give the word.
For maximum comedy value, I'd say a Mustang or Camaro. A Fox body Mustang could be light enough to have some decent performance with this - and a Mustang II could seriously haul.
Or - the AMC Pacer was reportedly designed for a GM rotary that never materialized. It would be a good what-if...
Or the Chevy Monza. Also a "designed for rotary" vehicle.
The real question is: What shouldn't have a rotary engine?
Rob R.
wvumtnbkr wrote: Or the Chevy Monza. Also a "designed for rotary" vehicle. The real question is: What shouldn't have a rotary engine? Rob R.
I'm coming up with a blank here......
has anybody suggested a lethal go-kart?
EvanB wrote: The fox-body mustang would be easy. There is an adapter for a rotary to T5.
It requires a bellhousing from an RX-3/4/5, though.
And then you're stuck with a trans that doesn't shift.
wvumtnbkr wrote: The real question is: What shouldn't have a rotary engine?
A mid '70s Holden Premier. Or a 26 passenger bus. That didn't stop Mazda from trying both.
You'll need to log in to post.